In the article “Known by God: C. S. Lewis and Dietrich Bonhoeffer,” Brian S. Rosner opens by acknowledging that God knows everything, but then he asserts that being known by God is different. He asserts that being known by God is to be in relation with God or to belong to God. He uses the writings of Lewis and Bonhoeffer to make his claims, and the Bible to substantiate them. He uses what Lewis wrote to explain that we God knows us better than we could know him and what Bonhoeffer wrote to explain that God knows us better than we know ourselves. Rosner uses a piece of dialog from Lewis’s The Chronicles of Narnia, The Voyage of the Dawntreader to make his claim. This dialog is between the characters Edmund and Eustace. “‘But who is Aslan? …show more content…
He uses the passages of Galatians 4:8-9, 1 Corinthians 13:12, Hosea 13:4-5, and 1 Corinthians 8:1-3 as examples of this. Rosner explains that in Galatians 4:8-9, Paul is putting emphasis on God’s knowledge of them, not their knowledge of God and that Edmund is putting emphasis on Aslan’s knowledge of him. In 1 Corinthians 13:12, Rosner comments on how Paul compares our knowledge to God’s knowledge. In Hosea 13:4-5, he explains the prophet is using the knowledge of God in a subjective form. In 1 Corinthians 8:1-3, he explains that loving God does not give knowledge of God. Instead, it lets us be known by God. He concludes this section by stating “Gods knows us better we than we know him” …show more content…
He does this using Bonhoeffer’s poem “Who am I?” Bonhoeffer writes this poem from prison, and the poem reflects this. Rosner comments on the structure and each section of the poem. The first three stanzas are of Bonhoeffer from the guards’ perspective, the fourth stanza is how Bonhoeffer views himself, and the fifth is him questioning himself, but ends with him answering his question. Rosner notes that Bonhoeffer had raised questions of self in his other works, and in his letters, Bonhoeffer had written, “One must completely abandon any attempt to make something of oneself . . . [instead] we throw ourselves completely into the arms of God” (qtd. in Rosner 349). Rosner explains how that being known by God can be comforting. He quotes Nahum 1:7, “The LORD is good, a stronghold, in the day of trouble; he knows (yada) those who take refuge in him” (qtd. in Rosner 350), as an example of the comfort of being known by God. Rosner claims that Bonhoeffer asserts that being known by God is to belong to God. He gathers this assertion from the ending of Bonhoeffer’s poem: “you know me, I am yours” (qtd. in Rosner 349). He uses the 2 Timothy to help in his assertion that God knowing you means you belong to him. He reasons using Psalms 139, which is about God searching us and knowing us, that to be known by God is a relational knowing. He then explains that when God looks upon us, he knows we are Christians,
Secondly, Stetzer reaches the audience using pathos. He states we should learn to love, worship, represent, and celebrate our God who deserves all loyalty (Stetzer, 2017). By using pathos, the author uses strong words that clearly appeal to emotion and Christians know how important love for God is. This is effective because the targeted audience includes people who know about God and how worship is supposed to be. Another example is when Stetzer expresses “Well, I am deeply offended too-by this statistic.
This ties back to him constantly being judged by the male figures in his life. To tie it all together, Bonner places small quotes saying “If they looked deeper they might have seen God.” The point that she is trying to prove is that if we look into each other we will realize that we are all the same, no judgement at all. She also says “People seldom look that deep, though. They do not always understand how to do things”.
It is 1741. The Enlightenment is spreading worldwide. The puritan people are leaving God. Johnathan Edwards gives a sermon on July 8th , 1741, trying to convince his fellow Puritan people to come back to God. He is going to try and accomplish this by giving his famous sermon, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God '.
Impression means the first and immediate effect of an experience or perception upon the mind; sensation. There are impressionistic paintings and impressionistic music. As for orators their ideas are their canvases, their language is their paint brush and their wordings are their colors that orators combine them together to paint elaborate paintings, the painting of speaking. Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God (1741) is a topical sermon which was wrote by Jonathan Edwards in the Great Awakening. Edwards wants to use the sermon to awaken his audience that they should dedicate their lives to God.
Rhetorical Analysis: Sinners A Puritan pastor in the early 1700s and philosopher, Jonathan Edwards, in his sermon, “Sinners in the Hand of an Angry God”, describes how angry God is towards sinners. Edward’s purpose was to scare sinners and unconverted men with the realities of hell so that they would seek a relationship with God. He adopts an aggravated tone to express to the sinners in his congregation that they should seek redemption because God can send them down to hell at any moment, but instead He gives them another chance. The metaphors and imagery that Edwards use in his sermon for the Great Awakening helps him to describe God’s wrath against sinners to make unsaved people convert back to the original ways of Puritans.
In the novel “A Prayer for Owen Meany”, John Wheelright undergoes a spiritual awakening when Owen Meany is killed. Owen Meany, John’s lifelong best friend, has faith in God and believes himself to be an instrument of God, a belief which John does not share until after Owen’s death. However, from the very beginning of the novel, it is clear that Owen was instrumental in the development of John’s faith. In fact, John says, “he is the reason I believe in God; I am a Christian because of Owen Meany” (Irving, 1).
The decision by the crusaders to continue on and capture Jerusalem was almost certainly religiously motivated. However the decision to capture Jerusalem without capturing any of the surrounding territory first wasn 't motivated by religious zeal but was motivated mainly by desperation and possibly a small amount of impatience. The reason the crusaders moved on Jerusalem without taking the surrounding area first was that "al-Afdal had seized Jerusalem from the Turks." Al Afdal was the vizier of Egypt. Given time he would be able to raise an army to reinforce the city.
“The most basic human desire is to feel like you belong. Fitting in is important.” This quotation by Simon Sinek, British/American best-selling author and motivational Ted Talk speaker, embodies the rhetorical appeal that marketers across the world so widely attack. Marketing campaigns target people’s wants and needs to persuade the consumer that they are buying a product that gives them more than any other product. In recent years, car companies have been particularly pushy in utilizing this tactic to convince customers that their car is the highest in quality, most reliable, and most beneficial in building relationships with friends and family.
In “Oedipus the king” translated by David Grene, a dialogue between different characters in which the idea of tone, attitude, and diction is amplified throughout this text using many rhetorical strategies and shifts supporting more emphasis to the text which brings it to life, as it also provides the tools for the audience to live through the text, and live through it’s reality. In the beginning as Oedipus mentions “I pity you, children” in a way it conveys not the the idea of sympathy, but the idea of sharing pain or close emotional feeling; providing the idea that words are often very good vehicles of communication. Oedipus uses children as a hook to grab people’s attention providing a patronizing yet audacious tone. As the text goes on Oedipus questions the priest “Why do you sit here with suppliant crowns?”
Abstract Within Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity, Entwistle inquires if psychology and theology can be unified. Entwistle suggest a sufficient technique of integration albeit the Allies model, and this paper will outline the strengths and restraints of this model as well as how Methods of Knowing and the Two Book Concept further discover the effectiveness of the model. The justification of this paper is to instruct its reader on different subjects of the Allies model concerning the integration of theology and psychology. In line with this, the advantages and drawbacks are shown as well as how this model deals with diverse concepts, and how it considers the relationship between Christianity and psychology.
The story Abraham and Isaac conveys a moral lesson about devotion and loyalty within religion. Genesis 22 revolves around God asking Abraham to sacrifice his son, Isaac. Abraham listens to God and takes his son to a mountaintop where he plans to slay his son for the burnt offering. Just before committing the act, an angel of the Lord stops him. Because he did not withhold his son from God, Abraham is promised the same covenant that is talked about in earlier chapters of Genesis.
“The deep truth is that our human suffering need not be an obstacle to the joy and peace we so desire, but can become, instead, the means to it. The great secret of the spiritual life, the life of the Beloved Sons and daughters of God, is that everything we live, be it gladness or sadness, joy or pain, health or illness, can all be part of the journey toward the full realization of our humanity” Henri
I feel that this passage can be relatable to our own God, a Christian God, or any God for that matter that one may believe in. It speaks as our own God has spoken, if we listen to the word we will be rewarded in Heaven or whatever religion you might be. It seems in most religions someone is promised something after you fulfill your duty to them. Whatever request that maybe, we hear it, we do it, we are rewarded. If we do not, we have to suffer whatever fate is brought to
Epistemology – Prof Caitlin Gilson Q – ‘’Outline the three major theories of knowledge in the Theatatus’’ The three types of knowledge discussed in the Theatatus are: knowledge is perception, knowledge is true judgement, and knowledge is true judgement with an account. Knowledge is perception - Plato's strategy tries to portray that knowledge is derived from the perceptible or sensible world. Plato explains that this ‘’perception only’’ knowledge is not the whole truth because the sensible world does not constitute the whole world.
When you hear presumption (guessing) is gone V21 “assuming that you have heard about him and were taught in him, as the truth is in Jesus,” - Paul has been talking throughout this letter as if the Ephesians are actually believers/ Christians o I have been doing the same But there is an IF here isn’t there • You are a Christian if o You heard Him, have been taught in Him, believed in Him, and resolved to follow him Paul warns believers to "test yourselves to see if you are in the faith; examine yourselves! Or do you not recognize this about yourselves that Jesus Christ is in you - unless indeed you fail the test" (2 Corinthians