Bill C-24, the Strengthening Canadian Citizenship Act is an enactment that amends Canada’s Citizenship Act. It was introduced in February 2014 and became law on June 20th, 2014. This new law changes the core aspects of Canadian citizenship as Chris Alexander, the current Minister of Citizenship and Immigration Canada, announced that citizenship is not a right but a privilege. Bill C-24 redefines the meaning of a Canadian and introduces negative impact to Canadians and applicants. In this paper, I will compare and contrast the former Citizenship Act with the current. Drawing on course readings and outside sources, I argue that Bill C-24 serves to control the immigrant population by introducing the knowledge and language requirements and citizenship …show more content…
Bill C-24 introduces reforms that undermine the fundamental rights of many Canadians and presents more difficult requirements for applicants. Under the former Act, citizenship applicants only needed to reside in Canada for three out of four years which is a minimum of 1,095 days. The current Act introduces a more lengthy residency requirement by requiring applicants to be physically present in Canada for four out of six years, and applicants must also provide an “intent to reside” statement (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2014, February 6). The former Act barred applicants who had domestic criminal charges and convictions. The current Act expands the bar to applicants with foreign criminal charges and convictions (Citizenship and Immigration Canada, 2014, February 6). The former Act established no authority to …show more content…
According to Paquet (2012), the citizenship test is both an instrument for citizenship promotion as well as a potential way to control citizenship acquisition. Citizenship tests can be the instruments of a multiplicity of policies beside civic integration (Paquet, 2012). Access to the test is limited only to those who meet the basic requirements for citizenship, therefore access to it is highly controlled by Citizenship and Immigration Canada. Paquet (2012) also argues that the nature of citizenship tests is to act as a means of selection or a decision-making tool to deal with citizenship applications. The language test is a test in addition to the citizenship test. Applicants must take the language test before they submit their application and provide proof that they have passed it. The test serves as an active instrument at the start of the citizenship process, and acts as a way to reject those who do not qualify. The language test serves as a gatekeeper for citizenship acquisition as applicants are required to have adequate knowledge of one of Canada’s two official
My issue with Canada's government is bill c-51, this bill is the worst bill that could ever be passed for a person like me. I have grandparents who want to visit my family and me, in their old age, before they pass away, but the immigration office won't grant them visit visa either. This is the biggest reason why I am against bill c-51 (anti-terrorism act).Bill c-51 states that if an officer has a doubt of you being a terrorist he can stop you and revoke your citizenship and also send you back from where you came from, even if your about to land they will make you stay on the plane and send you back, they won't even allow to get off how cruel is that, even if you are not a terrorist. The worst part about this bill is that if they have a doubt
Throughout its history, Canada has pride itself on its ability to facilitate multiculturalism. It is a place where people of diverse origins, cultures and languages can work collectively and be successful. However, in Quebec, some minority groups may feel neglected in comparison to another; hence discrimination. As a result, one of the most essential factors to reduce racial tensions is to provide equality for all. Therefore, this paper will examine the adoption, justification and criticisms of Bill 62 by the current Quebec Liberal Government.
In the article “Canada’s Immigration System Is No Kinder than America’s”, Adnan Khan speaks to the refocusing of Canada’s immigration system on short-term economic needs, rather than investing in high-skilled workers or ethical immigration policy. Khan documents ethical changes in immigration pathways such as Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker program, Refugee programs, and family reunification efforts which indicate the changing discourse around migrants from developing countries, Canada’s obligation to protect these migrants, and the sharing of resources and nationhood. This essay will critically analyze the examples and arguments presented in “Canada’s Immigration System Is No Kinder Than America’s” in order explore concepts of “worthiness”,
This article discusses how we are able to analyze recent policy changes from the development of Canada’s immigration policy. The main goal was to understand the objectives of the current policy, how it relates to the economy, and who the policy affects. According to the article, the country’s immigration policy has a history of wanting to use immigration for long and short term goals like economic growth and adjusting to current labor market conditions. Canada’s immigration has drastically changed from what it used to be after abandoning and adopting different concepts. An example would be the “absorptive capacity” concept that was abandoned after realizing it doesn’t truly help the long-term goals it originally was thought to be.
Top immigration lawyers in Hamilton, Ontario Canada is a good place to study, live and work. There are several opportunities available to develop oneself and the family. There has been an increase in the number of people seeking Canadian citizenship in the recent years. Unfortunately, Canadian immigration law is quite rigid and strict. Most people get their citizenship applications denied due to simple mistakes of omissions and commissions.
Migration is not a new concept in terms of Canadian history. In fact, Canada is primarily a nation of migrants. Canada as a country has a greater percentage of foreign born citizens in it’s population than both the United States of America and a majority of European countries (Reitz, 2014). The proportion of foreign born citizens in Canada is 0.8 of the total Canadian population (Reitz, Lecture 1). This is almost a full 1% of Canada’s total population.
Very few, if any, immigrants have the chance to learn English before traveling to the U.S. Because of this barrier, it is nearly impossible for organizations such as the Border Patrol to warn, aid, and communicate with them as they travel to the U.S. Although there are helpful signs along the border, they are written in English and are therefore indecipherable. Furthermore, the language border hinders an immigrant’s ability to survive in American society once they arrive. English is the written and spoken language in almost every city, thwarting immigrants’ opportunity to find jobs and interact with others. As they struggle to communicate, they become ostracized and do not fit in.
Trudeau’s multiculturalism concept became the hallmark of his government’s domestic policy and, arguably, the one with the greatest lasting impact on Canadian society. Trudeau’s multiculturalism mentality for a Canadian citizenry was a radical departure from the two-founding nation myth mentality that previous Canadian Prime Ministers had reinforced as a policy, primarily as a means to placate Quebec. This concept, that immigrants could come to Canada and become Canadian citizens while keeping their cultural heritage and traditions, was a stark departure from the previous policies, emphasizing either French-Canadian or, to a greater extent, British-Canadian heritage. In addition, prior to Trudeau’s multiculturalism concept, the Canadian government emphasized that immigrants were to abandon their cultural heritage and traditions, in order to obtain full citizenship. This even applied to the French-English conflict.
Annotated Bibliography Beadle, Amanda Peterson. " Top 10 Reasons Why The U.S. Needs Comprehensive Immigration Reform." ThinkProgress. © 2016 - Center for American Progress, 10 Dec. 2012.
n the twentieth century the Government of Canada decided to increase the number of immigrants coming into Canada, this step was taken to include individuals from countries where English was not the first language. The immigration policy led to an inflow of immigrants from all over the world. Now Canada welcomes between 240,000 to 265,000 people each year (Government of Canada, n.d.). An immigrant is a person who moves from their home country to another country for permanent residency (Merriam Webster, n.d.). The highest number of immigrants come from the Philippines (Government of Canada, n.d.).
In the past, Canada 's immigration policy had been discriminatory. Throughout the 20th century, the exclusivity of immigration in our country has evolved positively from the Chinese Exclusion Act, to the Changing Immigration Policy and lastly, the Immigration Act. To begin, the exclusivity of immigration in Canada has changed positively due to the Chinese Exclusion Act. This act is also known as the Chinese Immigration Act was passed in 1923. This act banned all people of Chinese nationality from immigrating to Canada.
The Charter further ensures a democratic society as it guarantees the fundamental rights such as voting rights, mobility rights and equality rights, which contain the protection against discrimination (Margaret, web). The laws successfully develop to balance the rights of the new immigrants and the interests of the Canadian society. On 2001, November 1st, Immigration and Refugee Protection Act was announced as a symbol of forming the Canadian multicultural society. It mainly improved the laws towards refugee determination, family reunification and gained the control over the country borders(Dwight L. Gibson eta·85). As the globalization has become the main stream of the world, Canada has advantages to move towards this goal as an immigration
Canada’s diversity is what makes it so welcoming. However, when immigrants arrive, they realize that the diversity was more of a mask that covered how unequally newcomers were treated. First of all, immigrants can continue to promote
Immigration Report Canada is a very diverse country. Meaning there is are people from all over the world. Immigration is a huge part of Canada, and Canada wouldn’t be the same without it. There are a lot of people who immigrate to Canada from all over the world for many different reasons. A lot of the people who are here now, were not originally from Canada.
Immigration has been and will continue to happen all around the world. There are so many reasons for people who come from different countries and ethnicities to move from country to country. The reasons why these people immigrate is either they are simply forced to, due to violence and hostility or that they are in search of a better life for them, and or their family etc. Canada being rated number one in quality of life has been a goal for people wanting to immigrate. The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act ( IRPA) was established by the Canadian government in the year 2002.