In the book, “A lesson before dying”, by Ernest J. Gaines tells a story that is set during late 1940’s. The story is focused on the interaction between Jefferson, a young and barley literate African American man, who is sentenced to death for an unjust crime, and Grant Wiggins, a teacher that wants to help Jefferson, but doesn’t know how. The story is told through the eyes of Wiggins. The main focus in this book was Grant and Jefferson’s relationship to transform each man throughout the story and teach each a lesson about human dignity. The most important character is Jefferson’s defense attorney, he was the reason that let Jefferson lose his dignity and self respect. Jefferson’s attorney is the symbol of society’s racism due to him defending …show more content…
Not only did the attorney use no real evidence to support his case towards Jefferson but the attorney also was not confident in his case. In one part of the court scenes Jefferson’s attorney states “He is innocent from all charges against him. But let’s just say he was not. Let us for a moment say he was not. What justice would there be to take this life?” ( Gaines pg: 8) This is a perfect example on how the attorney believes Jefferson is guilty in his case because in the end he gave the jury a mental image for a moment to vision Jefferson being guilty and then comparing the relationship on whether it matters to keep this man alive or not. All the evidence the attorney had to present Jefferson’s defense showed how much of a difference it is to be black rather then white in the …show more content…
The lawyer was assigned to “protect” Jefferson yet the attorney showed a clear image throughout the court scene that he does not care about the man one way or the other. For example, when the attorney describes Jefferson as “A thing to hold the handle of a plow, a thing to load your bales of cotton, a thing to dig your ditches, to chop your wood, to pull your corn,” (Gaines pg: 7) proves that the attorney does not have a desire to really help
•“She was not even listening. She had gotten tired of listening. She knew, as we all knew, what the outcome would be. A white man had been killed during a robbery, and thought two of the robbers had been killed on the spot, one had been captured, and he, too, would have to die” (4). This quote is important because it allows me to understand that Jefferson has to die because he was the only person in the liquor store and was a black man.
As Ellis states, his foremost difference of opinion concerned individuals who would be disciplined by the Assumption Bill. It was metropolis 's political theory that most worried him; he was concerned that urban speculators over the plebeian had fought the modification. As Ellis reveals, Jefferson was tormented by his inactiveness. His fortunes had been negotiated by his departure from Virginia. Nonetheless, Ellis ' write ups introduce what is Jefferson 's superlative political endowment, his cognition to work
Over the years, Jefferson had slowly grown to dislike Burr and he saw this trial as a way to deal with that. Even with the Constitution strict definition of slavery, Jefferson that Burr’s “guilt was beyond question, despite the fact that he had not committed any “Overt Acts” of treason. No matter which of the reasons historians have assumed for why men and boats had met on Blennerhassett Island, Burr did not “levy war” against the United States either. These acts show how Jefferson had let his distaste for Burr poison the way he perceived him.
Court Case Essay 16-21 By: Taylar Stueven Atticus put up a fight during the Tom Robinson case. Giving great arguments and counter arguments to prove that Tom Robinson isn’t guilty, also Atticus had a really well thought out closing argument. If I were Atticus during the trial I would have changed up his closing statement, otherwise everything else I would have kept the same and if I were a juror I wouldn’t have decided that Tom was guilty. Atticus had a really well thought out closing argument. He puts Tom Robinson’s life in their hands and lets them know that you are the one making the decision.
With the opening line, “I was not there, yet I was there. No, I did not go to the trial, I did not hear the verdict, because I know all the time what it would be,” Grant openly expresses his exasperation at the justice system of his society; he doesn’t need to attend court as he is aware that the outcome was already predetermined simply based on the color of Jefferson’s skin and there’s nothing anyone can do to change it. This system of racism is alluded to throughout the novel, particularly when Miss Emma, Tante Lou, and Grant pay a visit to the plantation of their former employer, the wealthy (and white) Henri Pichot. As the two women enter the house, Grant begrudgingly follows “them into the inner yard, up the stairs to the back door” (Gaines 18). The back door is symbolic of the centuries-long suffering of black people: that they will never be seen as equal to those with light skin.
All the jurors except Juror 3 had been convinced he was no longer guilty, even though the evidence displays it as such. After much debate juror number three says,”All right. ‘Not guilty’ ”(72). All the testimonies and evidence given by the court had been proven wrong by the jury. This shows major flaws in the justice system and it shows how reasonable doubt is found.
Towards the end of the story, although Jefferson has come a long way, he still does not fully understand who he is. So Grant states,“ The white people are out there are saying that you don’t have it- that you’re a hog, not a man.
The society a person grows up in and the actions of that society mold the destiny of a person. Ernest J. Gaines, the author of A Lesson Before Dying is a prime example of this perception. Gaines uses two of the preeminent characters in his book to display this idea, Grant Wiggins and Jefferson. Jefferson is convicted of murder and sentenced to death, albeit he was innocent and was just at the crime scene at the wrong time. A majority of the other characters visit Jefferson while he’s in jail, with one of those characters being Grant Wiggins.
Miss Emma and Tante Lou want Jefferson to die not like a hog but like a man. They persuade Grant, a teacher, to use his influence to convince Jefferson that he is indeed a man, and his life is more valuable than that of a hog. During an exchange with Grant in the kitchen, Miss Emma and Tante Lou confront Grant about what they want. The author illustrates the blunt approach the two women take as they discuss the matter with Grant:
“What justice would there be to take this life? Justice, gentleman? Why, I would just as soon put a hog in the electric chair as this.” (Gaines 8). In the novel, A Lesson Before Dying, Jefferson’s attorney focuses his entire defense on the basis that Jefferson was too stupid to plan a robbery or murder.
In his closing statement, Atticus attempts to persuade the audience to come out with an innocent verdict for the defendant, Tom Robinson. Atticus opens his argument by simply stating that the verdict for the case should not be hard to come up with. He follows this by confidently telling the court that the testimonies of the prosecuting side have not produced quality evidence that would indicate that Tom is guilty. Finally, he closes his argument by criticizing the testimonies of both Mayella and Bob Ewell. Overall Atticus, tells the jury the verdict should not be difficult to come up with, says that there is insufficient evidence to prove Tom’s guilt, and criticizes the testimonies of Mayella and Tom Ewell.
In the 1930s, if a black man was on trial there was a ample chance he would be convicted even if evidence proved he was innocent. Throughout history humans being prejudice and bias have affected the lives of thousands of people; some ending with favorable outcomes while others weren’t so fortunate. Within the book To Kill a Mockingbird the readers learn that prejudice and bias people outnumber the understanding and kind. One decision or in this case twelve decisions decide the fate for an unfortunate man. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee reveals that people often follow their biases and prejudices rather than the truth.
Immediately after hearing Jefferson’s execution date, he instantly thought, “ How do people come up with a date and a time to take life from another man? Who made them God” ( Gaines 157)? In disbelief, Grant feels infuriated on how these people are capable of doing this. Therefore, he questions the justice system by pondering to himself, “ Twelve white men say a black man must die, and another white man sets the date and time without consulting one black person. Justice” ( Gaines 157)?
Rotting in a cell. Counting down the days. Trying to learn how to be a man before the big day. In the book “A Lesson Before Dying” by Ernest J. Gaines: Grant Wiggins a school teacher tries to help a falsely convicted black man named Jefferson. During this time Grant release what can do to not only change Jefferson but change himself as well and he achieves redemption.
He was telling the jury… “Gentlemen, I remind you that this is a simple case. If you convict Tom Robinson, you must be sure beyond all reasonable doubt that he is