Arguments Against Euthanasia In The United States

447 Words2 Pages

Euthanasia is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering from a terminal condition usually by means of a lethal injection or high doses of certain medications. Euthanasia is nothing short of legalized killing only excused by having the permission of the dying person. Euthanasia demeans life, even more so than the very troublesome issue of abortion. With the efforts of research and new medical treatments coming out who is to say that a “terminal illness” will not be something that can be cured in the future. Euthanasia is morally and ethically wrong and should be banned in the United States. By allowing doctors to be part of euthanasia signifies a rejection of the importance and value of human life. Supporters of euthanasia claim that it is already determined permissible to take human life under certain circumstances such as self-defense - but they miss the point that when someone kills in self-defense they are saving the life of an innocent person - either their own or someone else's. When euthanasia is performed there is no one being saved – there is only life that is being taken. Many who believe in euthanasia say that it is a means to avoid pain and suffering, but we have to remind …show more content…

Through the time of suffering we should consider this a way to strengthen our faith. In order to recover from any illness it requires that we fight it. If we rely on the knowledge that there is an easy way out, such as euthanasia, then the human mind instinctively tries to take that as a way out. Other problematic issues with euthanasia are that an individual with a non-terminal disease may thoughtlessly select euthanasia without a firm desire to die. It is also possible that an individual who elects euthanasia may change his or her mind at the last moment and then it is clearly too

Open Document