Plato: According to the philosophy of Plato, he divided the view of total reality into two realms. One that is visible world, where we are living and experienced everyday life. According to Plato this not permanent and will change by time or collapse one day. In his word “Everything Is Becoming, Nothing Is.” And there is another world which is inside our own, permanent and in perfect order. This is real reality. Plato believes that the ultimate aim of an intelligent person should be take out the reality in outer surface. To achieve this a person need to see through the both sense and realms. Plato sees the human individual made up of three conflicting elements: passion, intellect and will. It is necessary intellect to in control, governing …show more content…
What-Actually-Does-Or-Makes-It? 3. What-Gives-It-Shape-By-Which-It-Is-Identified? 4. What-Ultimate-Reason-For-It-All-Cause? Aristotle’s four causes, then, are as follows: material cause, efficient cause, formal cause and final cause. Aristotle develops his famous doctrine of “the golden mean’’, according to which a morality is the midway point between two abstracts, each of which an immorality thus kindness is the mean between profligacy and selfishness; courage between careless and spiritlessness; self-respect between self-regard and self-humility; modesty between shamelessness and shyness. Aim should be always an average personality. And it is the way to achieve happiness in life. Comparison: According to Plato there are two worlds, in one there can be no such things which are reliable in this changing world. And the other world, where true knowledge is inhabit and only accessible to intellectual people. But Aristotle totally disagree with this, according to Aristotle there is only one world and that is this where we live in and experience. Both Plato and Aristotle philosophy believes that thought are the superior sense and should be in control. However Plato thinks that sense could fool an individual but Aristotle stated that sense is needed to determine the
To do this I must first explain several concepts of Aristotle which are: (1) how he concludes that the human function is reason, (2) what he means by happiness and how it is the human good, and (3) why he believes that the activity of the soul must be virtuous to become
Plato writes, “And suppose someone tells him that what he’s been seeing all this time has no substance, and that he’s now closer to reality and is seeing more accurately, because of the greater reality of the things in front of his eyes -- what do you imagine his
Plato breaks the justification of knowledge down into two types of realms that show what can be known by reason and what can be known by the five senses. These realms, then divided into two other unequal parts based on their clarity and truthfulness, make up what is known as The Divided Line. By understanding The Divided Line we can fully grasp the differences between the perceptual, also known as becoming, realm and the conceptual, also known as being, realm. The perceptual realm is the opinions and beliefs of people or it can be known as the visible realm.
Plato’s and Peter Weir’s main concept is that people see reality as the visible world when reality is more than just the visible world. In both stories, they only knew what they were being tricked into believing. They would throw hardships at them whenever they were about to find out the truth. For Plato, education is a turning around of the soul (Plato, 248). As the master creator Chrystoff says, "We accept the reality of world with which we are presented" (Niccol 1998).
This message entails people's outlook on reality and the perception that is presented to them. Overall I believe that Plato’s allegory has proved to exemplify a more effective transition from illusion to reality due to its relatability to Socrates message depicting human perception and
He believes that everyone has an unchangeable, eternal spirit that lives on even after their bodies die and perish. Socrates promotes dualism, the view that reality is divided into spiritual and physical realms. The spiritual realm, according to Socrates, is perfect, everlasting, immortal, and unchanging, whereas the physical realm is mortal, imperfect, and always changing. Socrates also believes that our souls pursue true wisdom and perfection. Although our souls yearn for knowledge and perfection, they are unable to reach their full potential because they are bound to imperfect and mortal human bodies.
When left alone it operates according to its natural ends, it is only with interference from external forces that a natural phenomenon is altered. So in this way Aristotle attributed the same four causes to natural as well as artificial or induced causes. (1) What is it?------------------------------ The formal
In other words they only know about that false reality that they are living in and to them there is nothing else. Plato then goes on to describe of how those people are enlightened when one is taken out of the cave and brought into the outside world they are shown the real reality and “enlightened”. If one of the people is enlightened he or she will be motivated to help those in the cave
The Curse of Knowledge Knowledge is power. Important people, People in power, are viewed as being intelligent. The more intelligent someone is, the better a leader they will be. Unfortunately, knowledge can make decisions hard to make. There are too many options presented.
I believe that Aristotle’s ideas are more significant as they closer to western beliefs than Plato’s. Similarities can be found in religion, art, government, and evolution. Unlike Plato, Aristotle believed in the idea of a god, much like many people today. He believed that God was the First thing to exist, separate from all matter and is the ultimate form. As well as is a pure minded being.
This paper discusses the life and accomplishments of Aristotle, a philosopher in Ancient Greece. It will discuss where and when he was born. Another thing it will discuss is where and how he was educated. It will also discuss some major things he accomplished. Finally, it will discuss his death and legacy.
The world we are living in is changeable and unreliable. Nothing is permanent such as human body, buildings, plants and others. Even our senses of sight, touch and taste can decline. Plato believed that behind this unreliable world of appearances, there is a world of permanence and reliability. Plato calls it world of ‘Forms’ or ‘Ideas’.
Mary Richardson October 19th, 2014 Philosophy 220g Damnjanovic Paper: Throughout this paper I will demonstrate how Plato’s belief that there are two realms influences his conception of objects, knowledge, properties, and change, and how Aristotle’s belief in only one realm contrasts directly with that of Plato. Throughout Plato’s main works, he argues for the existence of two realms: one that we interact with on a daily basis in a tangible sense, known as the physical realm, and one that represents the ideal form of everything in our universe and which we think about in only an abstract sense, known as the realm of the forms. I will first explain how Plato’s philosophy affects his views of major defining elements, such as knowledge, properties,
Socrates and Aristotle, despite being related through Plato, are in fact very different people and have many differing theories. Socrates outlook on life was that we 're all inherently good, but we will do bad things on accident. For example, when talking about ignorance, Socrates believes that we do not willingly do anything wrong. We instead have two branches of ignorance: not knowing something and knowing that you don 't know, or not knowing but you think that you do know (Plato, P.561). Aristotle on the other hand, claims that there is a different outlook on the model of ignorance.
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, the notion of the ‘mean’ refers to an “intermediate,” between the two extremes of “excess” and “deficiency.” Aristotle described a virtue as “a kind of mean,” and subsequently, defined virtues as “states of character,” that are “concerned with choice.” As virtues are connected to our actions, they can only be achieved by practical knowledge. Moral virtues come through habits, so in order to avoid extremes, we must learn through repetition. Aristotle stated that a virtue is more than a feeling, so a person who feels courageous, but does not act on it, is not courageous.