Objection 1. When looking to understand theology, one should not use concepts of philosophy in order to explain its meanings. An example of this reasoning is when Tertullian writes about how, “. . . philosophical reasoning might persuade some who do not accept the authority of purported divine revelation of the claims contained in religious texts” . He wants to say that if one were to rely on concepts that are about theology that have only been explained through philosophical meanings, then they are not really learning about theology. They are, instead, relying on reason, rather than faith, to explain their beliefs. Thus, leading philosophy and theology to not be compatible.
Objection 2. Moreover, the Bible warns its readers not to fall victim
…show more content…
Furthermore, in theology people will not be able to learn everything because we are not worthy. Instead, God will reveal himself to us using divine revelation, and only then will we understand his teachings. Saint Thomas Aquinas says, “hence it was necessary for the salvation of man that certain truths which exceed human reason should be made known to him by divine revelation” . The use of philosophy tries to explain these teachings that we are not prone to knowing. By trying to use philosophy to compare ideas to theology, people will still not fully understand theological teachings, because God has not granted them divine …show more content…
Theology can be difficult to understand due to its complex nature. By using thoughts and ideas that are stemmed from philosophy, people can interpret them to fit theological teachings. Clement of Alexandria discusses how “philosophy acted as a ‘schoolmaster’ to bring the Greeks to Christ, just as the law brought the Jews” . The Greeks were able to have a greater understanding of concepts due to the use of philosophy. They used theology to explain philosophy and vice versa. Meaning, that they would have to be intertwined and compatible. Plato even uses God as a way to explain his idea of The Form of Good. Shaun Doyle comments, “Plato’s theory of the forms, and especially his notion of the Form of the Good, were ‘rolled together’ into the mind of the God of Scripture” . Again, this demonstrates that the use of philosophy can be used to incorporate and expand on ideas unified in theology.
Reply to Objection 1. One needs to utilize both reason and faith in order to expand in the understanding of both philosophy and theology. One cannot simply choose one over the other while reading the Bible. St. Augustine writes about how he, at first, only focused on the literal sense of the text, or reason . In order to fully understand its meanings, he realized he needed to have faith in the teachings and use ideas from philosophy in order to comprehend what the messages were
The only compliance we have is to the Will of God, mission and commission that Christ has put us under. We have been commissioned to go tell it”-Pastor Jimmy J. Wilson 1. What should our church be known for in this community? 2. What services do your church offer?
The debate was immense for several reasons, one of utmost importance is that it meets the assertion that Christianity can be reasoned logically and rationally. In this debate, Thomas Warren uses the same tools of logic and rationality employed by atheists and agnostics to respond to and defeat Anthony Flew
After thoroughly reading Deuteronomy 32:45-47, Romans 10:17, Matthew 4:4, and Jeremiah 15:16, I have a better understanding of spiritual food. I noticed that in all four of the passages, it talks about the words of Christ. The words of Christ are found within the Bible in Scripture. In order for us to be spiritually alive, we have to take the words of the Lord, whether it be straight from our Bible or second hand from someone else, and break them down as they are our food. You break them apart by digging deeper into the meaning behind the verses not just focusing on what they are saying.
In the non-fiction philosophical book, Sam Harris, publisher of Letter to a Christian Nation, demonstrates his views of the flaws of Christianity. He contends the many contradictions he finds with the beliefs Christians hold to with their own lives and interactions with others. His goal in the book is to expose these errors to Christians themselves and present the question to them in a challenging tone. Harris does this by painting a vivid picture of the controversies surrounding Christians opposed to non Christians. He goes into great detail about his beliefs against Christianity and covers a broad scope, along with many topics.
Faith while important may not necessarily help one understand things. In the beginning, Eli talks about wanting to study things about his faith. He eventually receives help from a man named “Moishe The Beadle” who says this to him:” Man asks and God replies. But we
This structure gives ease to understanding the meaning of things, and reinforce a world order that is designed after what the gods have done. This is like that natural law of philosophers that come later and provides rationale for ancient western
The objection addressed the validity of the argument which had the premise 1, nothing is the efficient cause of itself except God and premise 2, a chain of causes cannot be infinite. The argument thus concludes there must be a first cause. This conclusion agrees with my thesis that Saint Thomas Aquinas’s argument formulated in the second way leads to a valid argument, which concludes that there must be a first cause and that God
Chapter 1 discusses that theological questions surround us no matter who we are. As Christians, we should show genuine care and interest in theology. Due to the fall, sin continues to follow our lives. Theological reflection is a way to examine all aspects of our lives and to see if they align with God’s word. It is a way to probe and minimize potential dangers of the idols of this world that give us momentary comfort; e.g., online shopping.
With the idea of “scripture principal” being the foundation of a certain faith, one could think that
"Men and women can accomplish no more important act in their lives than the act of faith; it is here that freedom reaches the certainty of truth and chooses to live in that truth" (n. 13). The combination of faith and reason is the base upon which many Christian teachings are built. Separating faith from reason would cause faith to be seen as a slight short story or myth. The two must work together in synchronization in order for the human spirit to rise to the thought of truth as proposed
The Bible is a filter for our belief system. 2 Timothy 3:16 (NIV) reads “All Scripture is God-Breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness. ” We may not always agree with one’s opinions but asking the right questions respectfully sets a firm foundation for
Two Authors, Two Books, Two Religions Nowadays, Greek and Roman mythology are considered fiction, but once upon a time they were known as very serious religions. Despite the similarities between the two, such as their gods, origins, and beliefs, they were known as enemies. They often fought over these similarities to argue which side was better. Not only was their conflict because of the resemblance to one another, they also clashed over differences such as their heroes and the characteristics of their gods. Knowing what makes them alike or what makes them different is a good way to understand the religion and also the way of life during the Greece and Roman times.
Question #1: What would you say is the main theme of the Bible? Answer #1: Jesus Christ is the main message of the Bible, God’s plan for mankind and the Universe, as Bickel and Jantz wrote on pg. 61. The good news of salvation in Jesus Christ.
As stated, God has created all of nature and thus His truth should be able to be found through it. Because of this, Christians should also understand that knowledge gained from nature can be true even if it is not outlined in the Bible. As a sinful people discerning God’s truth from nature, it is necessary for there to be a lot of wisdom and self-reflection on the Christian’s part. In understanding psychology and theology, we as Christians must first understand intellectual humility. Entwistle said this about intellectual humility, “Humility as an intellectual virtue involves our recognition of our intellectual abilities and liabilities.
In this essay I will argue against the previously mentioned statement using the following arguments: The inconsistency between theists, the dependence of morality on religion and finally, Euthyphro’s dilemma. One problem with the Divine Command Theory is that it assumes that all its followers agree on what