The Bill of Rights protects the innocent and even the guilty from the horrors of anarchy. “When unlimited and unrestricted by individual rights, a government is man 's deadliest enemy. As much as government would affect the people, it 's own residents would endanger the weak and innocent. It is protection against private actions, but also against governmental actions that the Bill of Rights was written”(Rand). The anarchy would be the downfall of the United States of America as we know it. Murderers and savages would walk the same streets your children would. Would you like the roads to be painted red with your children 's crimson blood? The government would be in ruins and other countries would try to conquer the bits and pieces of the
After the Declaration of Independence in 1787, the Federal Government turned to the creation of the Constitution in which delegates from 13 states convened to make compromises on their beliefs for the betterment of a nation. Although the Bill of Rights was initially not a part of the Constitution, the Federalists thought that it was crucial to ensure ratification of the Constitution. This ratification was one of the main reasons why the Bill of Rights needed to be added. Federalists feared a strong, central government, and created a Bill of Rights in order to prevent government abuse. Others believed that a dominating Government could prohibit rights in the future, which would not necessarily be expressed in the Bill of Rights.
Many people would die and new people
The Bill of Rights, the document that gives us our rights, and helped formed today’s society. But it wasn’t always as spread out and fundamental as it is today. Over the years, the Supreme Court has extended our rights in many ways. The Miranda vs. Arizona and Gideon vs. Wainright are just a few examples of the Bill of Rights’ extension. First and foremost, the Amendments addressing rights related to court weren’t always fundamental, but were only in use for federal hearings.
Some of these rights are still debated to this day, but they are key to establishing a dependable relationship between our government and its people. They establish a sense of security for our people, and gives them the confidence to express their opinions with the government. On the contrary, if we didn’t have the Bill of Rights within our Constitution, the fundamental principles that we all share as US citizens would not exist. Many of the immigrants traveling to our country would not come, because many of the immigrants who travel here are trying to gain more freedom. Our government would be more Communistic, and the freedom we all have taken for granted since birth would not
After the Revolutionary War, the 13 colonies found themselves in a bind. With a weak national government and no way to impose taxes under the Articles of Confederation, the burden of war debt seemed insurmountable. For the four years between the end of the war and the ratification of the Constitution in 1788, debate raged on between the Anti-Federalists, who supported the Articles of Confederation, and the Federalists, who desired to create a stronger federal government under the Constitution. Many subjects were hotly debated between the two groups, but two of the most important issues debated were the rights of the national and state governments and the Bill of Rights. While compromise on these issues eventually led to the ratification of
The Founding Fathers wanted to protect the rights of the people and tell the government what they can do. I believe that the Bill of Rights protects the citizens the way the Founding Fathers intended. Throughout history we see them in action.
Thomas Jefferson once wrote to James Madison: "A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth" seeing that some Federalist was skeptical of the idea of listing rights. James Madison called it "parchment barrier" but regardless of his skepticism the declaration of rights was added to the US Constitution13. Initially, some amendments proposed by Madison were rejected including his "proposal to extend free speech protections to the States. " What followed were debates over spelling out what constituted the Bill of Rights, especially the "due process of law" preserved under the 14th Amendment. However, it was not until in 1925, in Gitlow vs. New York, 268 U.S. 652, did the US Supreme Court found
John C. Calhoun was born on March 18th, 1872 in Abbeville, South Carolina. He went to school at Yale University. After graduating from Yale in 1804 and having spent a brief amount of time studying law in a South Carolina law firm, Calhoun returned to Connecticut to study at Litchfield Law School. Once he went back to South Carolina, he was admitted to the bar in 1808 and began to try and win over his cousin Floride 's heart. John and Floride had nine children, and only seven of those survived to adulthood.
The Constitution, which was written in 1787, was not fully supported by the citizens of the United States (Buescher). Citizens of the United States felt that their natural rights regarding life and property were not being upheld or protected by the United States Constitution. From a response to these complaints came the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights, written by James Madison in 1789, holds the first 10 amendments, or alterations, to the United States Constitution. Madison, a member of the United States House of Representatives, proposed the Bill of Rights in response to requests from states and citizens who believed that the Constitution did not protect basic human individual liberties (Bobb).
The first 10 amendments to the Constitution make up the Bill of Rights which was written by James Madison. He wrote The Bill Of Rights in response of calls from several states for greater constitutional protection of individual liberties. The people who signed the declaration made a promise to protect the people from the government. The colonist wanted to keep their rights because they had a fear of a tyrannical government. People believed and were taught that The Bill Of Rights came from the desire to protect the liberties won in the American Revolution.
The Bill of Rights gave Americans basic rights as a citizen of the United States and showed them that the government can’t take away these natural rights. Without the Bill of Rights, the government could do whatever they wanted to the citizens because the Constitution did not state the rights of the American people. To conclude, the new Constitution created more flaws than benefits for Americans. Although it did help America unite as one nation, it also could’ve fixed simple errors that we have today. The new Constitution made the national government too strong, it gave the President too much power, and it didn’t include a Bill of
We’re able to express our political beliefs without being fearful that we might get sent to jail. Without this amendment, we wouldn 't be able to speak up for ourselves against the government whenever we
Civil Rights Amendments: The 13th (1865), 14th (1868), and 15th Amendments (1870) were the initial amendments came in to the U.S during in 60 years. Known collectively as the Civil War Amendments, they were made to ensure the nondiscrimination for recently emancipated slaves. However the Emancipation Proclamation (1863) officially completed slavery within the U.S., many peoples were concerned that the right granted by war-time legislation would be capsize. The Republican Party controlled congress and thrust for constitutional amendments that would be more permanent and binding. The three most amendments prohibited slavery, granted residence rights to all population born or naturalized in the U.S. regardless of race, and prohibited
The Second Amendment essay If you were walking on the streets and some body came up and tried to hurt you, how would you react? The second Amendment allows us to keep and bare our arms to ourselves. This Amendment guarantees that We can that we could defend ourselves just like what a twelve year old girl in Bryan County did.
The First Amendment states many of the freedoms a US citizen posses, banning/censorship of books however has violated this idea of freedom. Some authors dislike the idea of censorship of books, such as Ellen Hopkins. Hopkins is a successful writer who wrote a bestselling book called, Crank. She also wrote the poem Manifesto which was adopted as the official manifesto of the American Library Association banned books week back in 2009. Crank was a book that was banned and censored, which Hopkins disliked.