Boston Massacre Dbq

Paul Revere was a Bostonian silversmith, an industrialist and a patriot in the American Revolution. He is a notable example of an ordinary man who became politically involved and risked everything to save his world. Revere contributed the famous depiction of the Boston “Bloody” Massacre, he aided in the Boston Tea Party, and finally led the Midnight Ride to warn the Patriots that the Red Coats were coming. While we’ve learned quite a bit of history pertaining to Mr. Revere, we have also noted that some of his major contributions may have been fabricated a little bit. (NEEDS MORE UMPH)

The author of this book through historical primary record such as diary entries, letters, poems, autobiographies and many other historical items has shared the true heroism of Paul Revere as well as others who defended and even died for the Rebel cause. Revere is documented doing such things as riding all over New England to share the movement of Gage’s men for months, burying a trunk full of documents during the Lexington Attack, and being fearless during his capture by Regulars from the Kings Own. Fisher leaves the reader with a better understanding of the patriotic man that Revere was willing to sacrifice everything for the rebel cause, not just lack of sleep on a cold New England night but he could not return home to his wife and children after this exhausting night warning all of the towns that Lexington and Concord were to be invaded and informing and convincing Handcock and Adams that they needed to go into hiding to keep the cause

(Revere) Learning about Paul, Paul takes many occasions in Boston, like the tea party. Boston is a scene

Three persons were killed immediately and two died later of their wounds; among the victims was Crispus Attucks, a man of black or Indian parentage. The British officer in charge, Capt. Thomas Preston, was arrested for manslaughter, along with eight of his men; all were later acquitted. The Boston Massacre is remembered as a key event in helping to galvanize the colonial public to the Patriot

Although they wielded the guns that killed five civilians, the trials of the British soldiers shows how they retained innocence in the murder of the Bostonians. If not for the violent assaults dealt by the Bostonians, the soldiers never would have needed to fire upon the rioters in order to defend themselves. However it went down, the Boston Massacre is one of the most overlooked events in world history. The spark of the Boston Massacre grew into the Revolutionary War. The anger of the outcome of the trial led colonists to events such as the Boston Tea Party, the First Continental Congress, and eventually the American Revolution.

The Boston Massacre was a very important event that happened in American history. It took place on the evening of March 5,1770. The Boston Massacre led to the American Revolution. My Monument will represent the musket that shot a black man named Crispus Attucks. Crispus Attucks was a symbol for abolitionists.

Hancock described the way the colonists felt as a result of the attacks on that “dismal night” and explains that they felt surreal amounts of “rage” and “astonishment” as they were left to “grie[ve]” the deaths of their fellow colonists. The emotions felt by the colonies are expressed through the description by John Hancock during his speech. He conveys the anger and shock that the colonists felt because of the Boston Massacre on the four-year commemoration of the attack on the colonist’s rights. Hancock encourages the colonists to take action to get justice for those Americans killed as he explains that they must “sacrifice [them]selves for the salvation of [their] country” without being afraid because “death is a creature of a poltroon’s brain.” John Hancock attempts to persuade his fellow colonists to protect their liberties and colonies by fighting back and getting justice for their colonies and the colonists who were killed in 1770.

The Boston Massacre was not called ‘The Boston Massacre’ at first. The original name, was in fact the ‘State Street Massacre’. Another name they had called it was the ‘Bloody Massacre on King Street,’ and Paul Revere was the one who had originally called it the ‘Bloody Massacre on King Street.’ Paul Revere, William Dawes, and Samuel Prescott all played a major role in The Boston Massacre. Paul Revere went down in History as the one to ride his horse around the Boston and warn people the British were coming.

The Boston Massacre was an accident in the beginning, but it continued to go on until it reached an extent where it could be an accident no longer. The real question is when did this accident start, and when did it get too far? Some say it should have never happened. others say it was the start of the revolution. Captain Thomas Preston was a British officer stationed in Massachusetts staying in a home with other soldiers under the Quartering Act.

The Boston massacre Although many historian believe the the Boston Massacre was a murder it is clear that it is an act of self-defense. First, the situation was self-defense because Preston was trying to get the sentry to safety when they got surrounded by armed and drunken citizens. The soldiers were defending themselves because they were unable to escape with their backs against the custom house and faced an angry mob. Secondly, the solders’ fire was eight to six seconds between them. this shows that the solders fired on there own accord because usually they all fire at the same time when following orders.

In Paul Revere’s Ride by Mr. David Hackett Fischer in 1994 discusses one of the very important events of American history that is always stays in the darkness of misunderstandings. In this book Fischer demonstrates not only the famous ride of Paul Revere but also successfully describes the action and the adventure packed night of April 18, 1775. In the midway of the book Fischer reveals how the alarm passed by Revere and the circle was completed back to Boston. This book is adventurous, a competition between two men, Revere and chief commander of the British forces, and General Thomas Gage whose characteristics is well explore and represents him as an historical individual. Fischer explores in this book how this single event is influenced by these two men.

Was the Boston Massacre an accident, people say it was, people say it wasn't. Till what I´ve heard the Boston Massacre is not an accident because according to the articles many witnesses were there to experience it such as Benjamin Burdick he had a testimony of the Boston massacre that he said in court. Another guy that was there to witness the horrible traject was Nutent Prince both of them saw what happened. Nutent Prince supports either side because it says in source D that he saw snow balls, clubs, buckets, that the colonist had to defend themselves. Also the testimony of Thomas Preston who was the captain of the british soldiers, said i source B that many of the civilians were yelling saying ¨Come on rascals, your bloody backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare...dam you…

he infamous street fight that took place in Boston, Massachusetts is referred to as The Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre occurred on March 5, 1770. The riot started when a few young boys began to throw stones and rocks at British soldiers who were guarding the Customs House. The crowd around the boys started to grow larger and larger, and then people from the crowd begun to join the boys, throwing ice at the soldiers and taunting them. The soldiers then fired, killing five colonists.

The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops

The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.