California Proposition 36 Analysis

Ewing had been convicted of both burglary and robbery approximately seven years before the crime that gave rise to this appeal. When he stole the golf clubs, he was still on parole following his release from prison related to those two felony convictions. Following his conviction in this case, the trial judge declined to exercise discretion and convict Ewing of a misdemeanor only, as he was allowed but not required to do under California law. After determining that Ewing should be punished for a felony offense, the trial judge applied California’s “three strikes" law, where a criminal defendant must be sentenced indeterminate life sentence, which in this case was twenty-five years to life. Ewing claimed that the sentence was disproportionate

Assignment 4.1: California Government in Crisis There are many obstacles of California politics, which contribute to our inability to live the California Dream. For example, California debts continues to escalate, due to our taxation system hasn’t changed over the past years. Hence, during 2012 there was a budget gap of 16 billion dollars, which was more than the total revenues receive for general funds. Since, our taxation system depends highly on the income taxes paid by capital gain, the stock market must increase, so it can create a surplus. If that doesn’t happen, the government must find another way to finance their budget.

I will discuss the historical significates of the Davis-Bacon Act as well as the present day implications of the Construction Wage Rate requirements Statue. During the great depression the lack of representation and enormous discrimination of minorities provided an unfair advantage to white unionized workers. The Davis-Bacon Act was a direct reflection of this ideology, according to Institute for Justice, “with the specific intent of preventing non-unionized black and immigrant laborers from competing with unionized white workers for scarce jobs…” (Bullock). The Davis–Bacon Act of 1931 is named after, James J. Davis, a Senator from Pennsylvania and Representative Robert L. Bacon of Long Island, New York and was passed by Congress and signed

In 1978 a group of California residents and businesses decided to pass a proposition that would reduce the overall tax rate for all local governments. The Ambivalent Legacy had California citizens and legislatures took a vote which lead to the passing of Proposition 13. Proposition 13 increased all states and local tax it also reduced property tax rates on homes, businesses and farms by 57% this was a great impact on not only California but as well as the United States. California passing proposition 13 socially impacted America by being named the “People’s initiative to limit property taxation”. It was called this because proposition 13 was an Amendment of the constitution of California.

The article “California Leads a Quiet Revolution” by Beth Gardiner discusses about the California’s goal of increasing the utilization of renewable energy sources. With its modern technologies, politics, and its abundant sunshine, California has managed to overcome their energy crisis problems by utilizing renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power. While the achievement is remarkable, difficulties have also appeared. The influx of solar and wind power has changed the pattern of electricity production, resulting in a mismatch between the said influx and the demand, while the storage devices that would solve said problem are deemed to be too expensive. Even though there are several problems, the addition of clean energy hasn’t resulted

This article it states the number of innocent people who have been killed by the system due to the laws similarity written like prop 66. They also have three reasons why proposition 66 will be bad and they have a story of a man who was wrongly convicted and killed. This website is credible because this is a campaign with more than five organizations who fund and support them. It helps me on paper because I also need to look at the opposing sides reasons in why they think it 's bad in which theirs was that they are afraid that innocent people would get killed. But now I have to look for evidence to prove them wrong and to bring insight that wrong convictions will not happen due to the thorough

Id. With the exception of a prior conviction, “any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” Id at 490. MISSING SENTENCE HERE Id at

In California there are 6 million students that attend run-down, crumbling schools. However, this can all be changed with prop 51, prop 51 is a helping hand to all the public schools in California that are outdated. Prop 51 can ensure the wellbeing of our students, and help them get a great education. Prop 51 helps them out by repairing the schools, and constructing new buildings so that the students won’t be overcrowded in just one room.

Proposition 54 was a measure that Californians were asked to vote on in 2003 that sought to prohibit state and local governments from classifying any individual by race, ethnicity, color, or national origin. An excerpt of an argument in favor of this proposition states that California is the most racially and ethnically diverse state, and that it is the wrong for the government to put a label on Californians based on their ethnic background. The thesis of the argument is that the government should stop categorizing its citizens by color and ancestry. The argument's t main premise is that being asked to state one's race is a means for the government to classify, categorize, and divide the people. The article continues on and states that

Thousands of bills pass in the California legislature every year. Just later is responsible for tackling the state 's problems big and small. The legislature does not act in policymaking vacuum rather him a share power with the other branches of government. 40% approved with the legislate tiff branch and 44% disapprove of the legislative branch in a survey taken in 2013. Structurally numerically much for today 's state legislature parallels its original design intent.

Proposition 58 was designed by legislators to repeal the English-only immersion requirement and waiver provisions required by Proposition 227 of 1998. In English-only programs, students learn subjects from teachers who speak only in English. Proposition 227 required English learners to take one year of intensive English instruction before transitioning to English-only classes. As a legislative referral, Proposition 58 was voted on in the California Legislature. In the General Assembly, 53 legislators voted to place the measure on the ballot and 26 voted against doing so.

The court rejected that allegation and said that the test for determining whether or not the law violates substantive due process involves when “it bears a reasonable relationship to a permissive legislative objective and is not discriminatory, arbitrary, or oppressive.” Consequently, the court supports that the Act was created in order to avoid further Acts of crime enacted by reoffenders by making sure that they will receive and serve the maximum and the entire sentence under the law. Therefore, the court concluded that the argument fails due to the responsibilities of the trial courts to just adjudge a minimum mandatory

Under Proposition 47, early releases are predicated on a specified class of crimes. The incarcerated person does not have to "do" anything to qualify for early release. Either he or she is not eligible to file a petition for early release. Eligibility depends on the nature of the crime. Under Proposition 57, the inmate has certain responsibilities in order to qualify for early parole.

Good evening! This is Bryce Seyler with WFREE News reporting live from the United States Supreme Court. Today, the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Mapp v. Ohio making it one of the most famous Supreme Court cases to take place in this century. Supreme Court Justices had to decide whether evidence discovered during a search and seizure conducted in violation of the 4th Amendment of the Constitution was admissible in a state court. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Dollree Mapp in a 6-3 vote.

In 1998, the growing resentment of the immigrants led to the approval of California Proposition 227, known as English Language in Public Schools Statue. Proposition 227 gave Californians the opportunities to choose whether students should or should not be taught primarily in English in public schools. When the Proposition 227 was approved, it was supported by the idea that it would be the “best way to integrate the state’s booming immigrant population