For Julius Caesar, traveling to the capitol to meet with the Conspirators was a decision that sealed his fate. Before he left, his wife Calpurnia had tried to convince him to stay home after having a morbid dream that had shaken her. However, Decius came and convinced Caesar to rethink his decision and come to the capitol where he would be assassinated. Throughout the discussion on whether Caesar should go to the capitol, it’s shown that both Calpurnia and Decius use pathos to persuade Caesar; difference being that Decius was able to persuade Caesar more due to him using effective word choice and his fatal flaw against him. Calpurnia uses pathos and appeals to the fear and pride of Caesar, though she does not do so to the extent of Decius.“Which drizzled blood upon the Capitol. The noise of battle hurtled in the air. Horses did neigh, and dying men did groan, And ghosts did shriek and squeal about the streets. O Caesar! These things are beyond all use, And I do fear them.” (Act II Scene ii, lines 21-26) Calpurnia describes the scenes …show more content…
Due to this flaw, it was fate that Caesar would succumb to this and die because his judgement was clouded. Calpurnia uses foreshadowing in her argument, for she talks of omens, but neither Calpurnia nor Caesar knew that her dream was a telling of his fate. This made Decius’ argument seem more realistic, for Calpurnia’s foreshadowing is more abstract while Decius’ claims that the council would look down upon him would seem more sensible. It’s easy to believe that someone is cowardly if they do not show up to an important event due to the possibility of danger, but it’s hard to grasp something that is not set in stone. The dramatic irony would be that Decius is a conspirator and is plotting Caesar's assassination, that was known to the audience yet unknown to the all characters except Decius
Both Calphurnia and Decius use fear as a part of their arguments but, while Calphurnia taps into her own fear for her husband, Decius exposes Caesar’s fears about his reputation. Calphurnia tells Caesar of a dream in which blood was spouting from his body and as a result she argues that he should not go to the Senate House. Caesar, however, is not convinced by this omen because he feels that all events are “purposed by the mighty gods” (Line 16). Here he is claiming that the great, powerful gods would have more important matters to sort out than the life of Caesar. Of course, because Caesar’s true nature is egotistical his contention that he is not important enough to be of concern to the gods reveals his tendency to say things that are inconsistent
Pathos uses emotions to lure an audience into an angry or sympathetic state so that they will feel the same emotion the speaker feels. Antony makes use of pathos by mourning, “Bear with me; My heart is in the coffin there with Caesar, And I must pause till it come back to me” (3.2.102-104). This is showing Antony’s emotion, which will then let the people of Rome sympathize with him, causing them to change their thoughts on the situation to Antony’s favor. “What cause withholds you then, to mourn for him?” (3.2.100).
Most times, when one thing is said, two things can be heard. The intent of the speech can be genuine and straightforward, or hidden in double-think and entendre. In Julius Caesar, this is the case with the dichotomy between Brutus and Marc Antony's speeches. the speeches both are given to sway the crowd to one side, and both use the tools of pathos, ethos, and antithesis to lead the country to their rallying cry.
On the way to the capital there is the soothsayer and artimidorus that try to stop him but he ignores them when he arrives Decius I think start to ask Caesar to let his brother or cousin come back to Rome and then after that Casca is the first to stab him and Brutus is last. Caesars last words are "Et tu, Brute- Then fall Caesar!"(III.i.78). This is when he realizes wow even Brutus stabbed me my closes friend I must fall. A realization maybe I did something terrible or something to make my friend do this to
People may think that Decius was in the right for letting Caesar die since they might have thought Caesar did a ton of terrible
Cassius is so envious of Julius Caesar and all of his power, that he plans an assassination and gains the help of Brutus and some other statesmen. Because of this, Julius Caesar by Shakespeare is a perfect example of the deadly sin of envy. Cassius is jealous of Caesar because they were once equals and now Cassius feels threatened by him. Envy leads many of the characters in this play to do arrogant, foolish, and selfish acts. All of the conspirators feel threatened by Caesar’s power and, Cassius especially, thinks Rome and their own positions would be much safer with Caesar gone.
Persuasive Precision In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Ethos, Logos, and Pathos play an essential role in transforming a shocked, confused crowd of mourners, into an angry mob of rioters. Antony’s persuasive speech proves to be influential on the crowd, especially in Act III, Scene II. Antony utilizes Ethos, Logos and Pathos to completely change the mood of the crowd.
Decius convinces Brutus to go to the senate house through the use of pathos, ethos, and logos. Through the use of pathos, Decius appeals to Caesar’s emotions and ultimately convinces him to go to senate. First, Decius refers to him as “Mighty Caesar (2.2.69)” to appeal to Caesar’s desire to be mighty and powerful. Decius convinces Caesar that a mighty man would not go into reclusion over a dream. Next, Decius appeals to Caesar’s insecurity that people view him as timid and weak.
In the art of persuasion, there are many tactics that people use to convey or persuade people into getting what they want. There are several tactics used to achieve this, but the main ones that we see being used today are classical appeals like pathos (emotional), ethos (authority), and logos (logical). These appeals have shown up in many types of literature for a character to get their point across, but one of the best examples is in William Shakespeare's “Julius Caesar”. These appeals are used in two great speeches that are told by Brutus and Antony. Brutus’s speech uses ethos and pathos to get the crowd to agree to his killing of Caesar, while Antony uses the power of pathos and logos to refute what Brutus said to convince the crowd to follow him in his
Decius knows Caesar's weakness and uses it to its fullest, “ But when i tell him he hates flatterers, / He says he does, being the most flattered, / Let me work” (II.i.210-212). Boosting Caesar's confidence and using his emotions against him go hand in hand. Many people in positions of power become arrogant, Caesar is no different; which will play right into the conspirators hands. Not only does Decius begin almost every sentence with worthy or mighty Caesar, Decius worries Caesar by suggesting:
Leaders derive their power from a range of sources – military force, wealth, rank. However, leaders that we most admire win followers through the skill of persuasion. The ability of a speaker to persuade his listeners to agree with him signals that he is a powerful and astute figure. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the character of Cassius attempts to convince Brutus that Caesar should be assassinated. Brutus, however, cares deeply for Caesar and is hesitant to kill the beloved hero of Rome.
In William Shakespeares, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, oOf all the characters, the character that uses their credibility and persuasion in the most malice manner is Decius Brutus; Shakespeare develops this through his use of Pathos, Ethos, Imagery, and Rhetorical question. Calphurnia, Caesar's wife, explains a vision she had bared witness to in her dreams. This vision included Caesar meeting his untimely death as blood pours out of a sculpture of him and the citizens of Rome smile as they dip their hands into the blood. Caesar, listening to his wife's vision, decides to call off his arrival at the Senate House. When Decius hears of Caesar's planned absence, he decides to help persuade him by telling Caesar,; “Your statue spouting blood in
The portrayals of the characters were mostly accurate but I greatly dislike the portrayal of Calpurnia. I understand that her character had no purpose besides warning Caesar about his inevitable
Caesar’s scornful behavior towards the soothsayer illustrates his arrogance. Later, in Act 2, Calpurnia pleads Caesar to stay home because she realizes that all the omens are pointing to Caesar’s death. Despite her plea, Caesar insists “Caesar shall forth: the things that threaten’d me ne’er look’d but on my back; when they shall see the face of Caesar, they are vanished” (2.2.15-17). These incidents show that Caesar’s pride blinds his ability to see his tragic end. Moreover, Caesar ignores his own feeling of uneasiness towards Cassius for the sake of his pride.
Back in the times of ancient Rome, prophecy was a belief that the vast majority of people had. Gods and goddesses were thought to have controlled everything in the people’s lives from their money to children to weather. Prophecy itself is the act of predicting future events that eventually come true. The main use of prophecy in this play was the deaths of the play’s main characters. In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, prophecy plays a major role in cryptically laying out the deaths of the play right in front of its audience STORM