Can The Law Make Us Be Decent Summary

Saving someone other than yourself in a terrible situation is not something everyone thinks about doing, but in this case Stefania Podgorska not only saved herself but 13 others, and they all lived. Podgorska didn’t plan to save all those people it was more a spur of the moment thing, and not only did she help them by getting them food she saved every last one of them; and they all lived to see more days. In life, good deeds go unnoticed, the courage and unselfishness of her mind at that time should not be something someone just forgets about it’s a wonderful thing she did and everyone should know about her. By examining Podgorska and her moral courage it is clear that she deserves all the attention given, and or all the respect others show. Stefania came from a well known Catholic family that served the community, and so, when it came to do what she did i’m sure it wasn’t in her mind out of the ordinary/or heroism.

Not only was he caring and moral, he was also

In particular, a benefit that would result from the law is that it will encourage citizens to take action and help the individuals that are in desperate need. When people begin to make better choices and become involved, many innocent lives will be saved. In addition to this, the article “If Decency Doesn’t, Law Should Make Us Samaritans” by Gloria Allred and Lisa Bloom, the authors assert that “The real reason individuals do not reach out is because they feel disconnected from strangers in need... If each of us recognized a moral responsibility to come to the aid of others, we would all gain the benefits of a stronger and safer community” (Allred and Bloom 2). This quote says that people do not help others in need because they are not close to each other but if a federal law was created that said they were obligated to give assistance to those in imminent danger, everyone would benefit from it and communities would be much safer. Despite the fact that someone who is in a crisis and is in need of help might be a stranger, that should be no excuse for one to not lend a hand.

I agreed with, because I witness it. Residents (society) do the bare minimal to help the victim. A man called down,” Leave that girl alone” (Gansberg 680).The man does not do anything after that. This suggests that the man has done his part and is finished with this. One time I got in a fight with my friend and a car stopped.

(Wiesel XIX) Bystanders cannot understand the pain the victims went through, so they choose to ignore the problem. They showed a preference to the comfort of blindness and

The way of knowing about the Law leaves out important aspects of the society, “legal language flattens and confines in absolutes the complexity of meaning inherent in any given problem […] a paradigm of larger social perceptions that divide public from private, black from white, dispossessed from legitimate” (Williams, 1991, pp. 6-7). The quote explains the way in law many aspects of the social life, of reality, as left out. This division in Law leaves out important aspects that should be taken into consideration. Legal language can disguise important cultural, social, historical aspects that may affect the interpretation and the consequences of a legal decision or a law, by its way of “flattening” important topics. Therefore, the Law is not written in stone and aspects of reality should be taken into consideration.

Starting off, Silver mentions a factoid about a specific law instituted in many states on how “Good Samaritans are protected from liability if their well-intentioned efforts inadvertently result in harm,” however there is a flaw on how, “the callous bystander who refuses to render even minimal help in a dire emergency — goes unpunished” (Silver 1). By introducing the contrast between the law and its effects, it clearly points out that Silver wants different results for the virtuous and the wrong. Also, for what is asked for from Silver clearly presents his defense towards the good samaritans, about how they should be defended no matter what they could have done to the victim. Additionally towards the bad samaritans or the bystanders, Silver does not call for those people and he does that by requesting a law to “simply require warning someone of imminent danger or calling 911” (Silver 1). This openly demonstrates what Silver would want to merely have the society do in case of an emergency, through the law.

Rosenblatt wrote the article to convey that selflessness can be perhaps the best act of charity and power a person can give, and that it can really show a person’s true character. The man must’ve known that if he stayed in the water that he would perish, but he put the needs and lives of the other passengers before his, a true act of courage and kindness that the survivors surely remember each day they continue to live. The passenger showed the he had power over nature, even though in the end, he himself succumbed to nature. He showed that even the greatest acts of compassion can be given in the face of death. The overall theme of Roger Rosenblatt’s article, the overall inherent message, is that selflessness is perhaps the most valuable gift to be given, even when the cost itself may be

With the growth of society and the fast pace of everyday life, people had slowly forgotten their sympathy and ethical responsibility. In the “Can The Law Make Us Be Decent?” contributed by Jay Sterling Silver, he expresses his feeling of irritation how people goes unpunished even though they stood by to watch people dying. People should be punished for ignoring others in need of help because it’s inhumane. People should be penalized for overlooked the troubled one because they didn’t support those in need even though they have the ability to help. In the article, “If Decency Doesn’t, Law Should Make Us Samaritans” written by Gloria Allred and Lisa Bloom is about the car crash of Princess Diana.

There are many other instances where his generosity shows. He also becomes joyful, before he had absolutely no joy he was unhappy and his actions would either make people pity him or feel awful as well. He changes and becomes a ball of sunshine. To everyone on the street he greets them and is so pleasant to everyone that it is rubbed off on the bystanders. Something new happened and in some of the conversations he was to come to their homes, which warmed his heart even more.

He is saying that sometimes what the government does will result in occasional injustice. However, if a particular circumstance would require that you impart harm on another person, he's advising you to break the

Responding to Singer: On Individualism and Pragmatics Michael Anderson Soh Sheng Rong Matriculation number: U1731581B 22 September 2017 Words: 1917 This paper is written as a response to Singer’s “Famine, Affluence and Morality”. Singer poses what he deems a moral obligation to mankind. That is, we are not just responsible for our personal good and are instead obligated to intervene to rescue others from suffering if we possess the capability to do so.

Bystander effect indicates that the larger amount of bystanders the less likely any one bystander offer help, while people help others more when they are alone. The failure of the bystanders’ helping has lead more tragic events happen today. Several things are correlated with the bystander effect. Some example included the diffusion of responsibility, the majority of bystanders’responces, the ability of helping and the public self-awareness, etc (Darley & Latané, 1968a; Latané & Darley, 1968b; Rutkowski, Cruder and Romer, 1983; van Bommel, van Prooijen, Elffers and van Langea, 2012). The following four literature reviews attempt to demonstrate about the bystander effect.

The reason is the Bystander Effect is a theory that in an emergency people don’t get involved due to various reasons. For example, people like the witnesses don't jump in or get involved because they will stay in shock or be scared to help out an innocent person that has been murdered or being in a situation of a murder. In my opinion one of the witnesses could of at least called 911 or jump in to help out the innocent person. Consequently, people around the world believe that there should be a law to force this behavior among citizens called, The Good Samaritan Law. In a short brief way, this law would and could punish or fine people who failed to aid a person in need of help.

A popular slogan of today “You’re a fool if you obey the rules”(A Red Light for Scofflaws). In this excerpt from Frank Trippett’s “A Red Light for Scofflaws”, the author argues that citizens who break ‘minor’ laws should be reprimanded. Trippett goes on by stating that when it comes to these laws an increasing number of citizens are breaking them. Trippett provides observational evidence on why people breaking these laws are in the wrong doing. This excerpt contains a informational tone for the general public that may be ignorant to these ‘minor’ laws.