Sandy's teacher gave her a low grade for many reasons. First of all, she did not form a hypothesis. Also, Sandy did not form questions to be answered after the experiment was over. However, there was one main flaw that highly contributed to her poor grade, which was the fact that Sandy did not have any variables and factors that she could compare her results to. For a well coordinated experiment, Sandy would have formed a hypothesis. For example, if rap music is played to a pea plant then the pea plant will grow exceptionally. Then, Sandy should have used identical pea plant seeds in the same soil, watered the same amount, and given the same amount of sunlight. The only varying factor in her experiment should have been the rap music being played
The Catawba was a group of indians that lived on the border of North Carolina near Rock Hill, South Carolina. They called themselves the “river people” because they knew how to live around the water and how to use it to make their lives easier. They also used palisades for protection and traded to get more advanced weapons. Their homes were built out of saplings, grass and reed mats, and bark. They elected a official to make rules for their villages.
Which of the following is a characteristic of a good hypothesis? A.Original idea not based observation B.Raises further questions C.Should be testable D.Contains more than two variables. 43. Which of the following gland regulate the function of other glands in the endocrine
Barry also gives a couple of examples to show that although the science fair is created with educational intentions, it usually does not turn out that way. For example, hypotheses are a large part of the scientific process, but usually end up being very vague facts and statements like: “‘There is a lot of gravity on the ground’”. The title of the essay, “Science: It’s Just not Fair”, also displays the writer’s use of wordplay, and it shows the pointlessness of the science fairs as they don’t teach much to students as they rush the
The experimenter is there to encourage the teacher to continue. The learner gave wrong answers purposely to see how far an ordinary American citizen would go just because a legitimate authority figure told them to. The experimenter had four prods to make the teacher continue. Despite hearing the screams of the learner, the teacher or participants would continue because they were given orders by an authority figure. The experiment resulted in 65% of the participants going to the maximum voltage of 450 volts, which would kill the learner.
S104 Exploring science Tutor-marked assignment
Our class went to the Conodoguinet creek and we tested the creek for signs of acid rain pollution, phosphates and nitrates, and dissolved oxygen levels. My hypothesis is that the creek would end up being polluted. But after the testing we did our results showed that the creek was not polluted. some of the tests we completed were water alkalinity tests, critter count tests and rocks that neutralized the acidity of acid rain. We also calculated the velocity of the water.
How I feel and what I think about the work Zimbardo did in this experiment. First of all, let me make sure we are on the same conscious level as I begin to answer these questions in regards to Professor Zimbardo, and his master craft being a psychologist. Surely you agree his results are sketched primarily in his experiences in social psychology. Establishing human relations and the grounds of united we stand, one of the most important significant developments is the influence of behavioral science. Behavioral science focuses on the why in human behavior and sometimes the answers could be hard to believe.
Giving the audience a deeper understanding, Barry uses examples of what questions might arise in an experiment. Taken from the text, “A shovel can dig up dirt but cannot penetrate rock. Would a pick be best, or would dynamite be better—or would dynamite be too indiscriminately destructive?” (Barry). Throughout this passage Barry uses vivid images of a rock to display the effectiveness of questions a scientist might face.
She found that the person, who was defiant for the experiment, was a soldier who murdered Japs, and didn’t feel ashamed for it. He also kept Milgram’s cover and never told a soul about his experiment, even though it was an atrocious experiment. She also found out, that the person who was obedient in the experiment lived a great, normal life. After being in this type of observation, this subject felt that it helped him with life. He found how easily he was manipulated in such a test, that he began to become stern with himself and learned to deal with such expectations.
Question4: CATWOE is a checklist for thinking. It is A technique that Corporate Experts use to classify what is the corporate is attempting to accomplish, what are the difficulty parts and how is the resolution going to influence the business and individuals concerned in it. There are six components of CATWOE: 1. Clients Clients are the stakeholders using the system. The first stage in a CATWOE analysis is to spot such patrons and comprehend how the procedure or system involves them.
The hypothesis for this project was “If a soccer ball has less regulation air pressure, then the distance the ball travels when kicked will be less.” It was therefore rejected. The soccer ball with less air traveled farther than the soccer ball with more air. The average distance of the soccer ball with less air traveled 29 yards, and the soccer ball wind or that I was tired.with more air traveled at an average distance of 19 yards. could’ve been caused by the It Everything went according to plan except that the hypothesis was rejected.
High Skates Reflection Many issues addressed in the High Skates video are still problems that schools in the United States are dealing with today. As a future coach and teach I feel that it is important for myself to realize that there is always going to be problems when it comes to the education system. However, I need to realize that it is my job to fix those problems to the best of my ability. One problem that the video addressed was teachers getting payed on the performance of their students.
In this science fair project, I tested if the difference in gender or age has a strong effect on the stroop test in order to understand the stroop effect more in depth. The results shown that adults understood the stroop effect better than other groups of people. I hypothesised that the difference in gender and age had a strong effect on the stroop test and that Kids would understand the stroop test better than adults. The difference in age and gender did affect the outcome of this experiment, however it was the adults that understood the stroop effect the best because of sharp eyesight. In this activity, the amount of time it took for each person to complete the stroop test was in relation to the people I chose to participate in the stroop
The Red Book Project was a simple, but insightful investigation, allowing students to apply statistics, organizing and summarizing data and then drawing conclusions based on the data. An investigation focuses on a well-defined collection of objects constituting a population of interest. In this study, the students were investigating the number of red books that were in the Walsh Library at Seton Hall University in about fifteen minutes. My group approached this by each member taking a floor at the library, counting how many red books are on a shelf, then multiplying the amount of books by the number of shelves on the floor, and lastly the total books on each floor from each member were added together for a final record of the amount of red
Schwartz discuss their experiment that measure the biological effects of music, pink noise, and healing energy. There were 3 experimental groups, healing energy, musical sound, and pink noise, and one control, an untreated set of plants. The researchers measured the effects by counting the number of seeds sprouted out of groups of twenty five. The number of seeds sprouted was counted at 12 hour intervals over a growing period of 72 hours. The researchers found that musical sound had a “significant effect” compared to the control group.