A Rhetorical Analysis Of Cepeda's Strategies

This helps the reader recover from the challenging statement introduced in the beginning. As a result, this encourages the doubtful reader to continue and hear out the rest of the argument. Another smart strategy within listing this survey is establishing credibility. The information comes from a trustworthy Democratic and Republican source, which can help appeal to readers and help them relate. This helps the argument by establishing ethos and implying logos, while also showing the reader a sense of non-bias.

As an English professor in the University of Maryland, Jeanne Fahnestock is one of the modern rhetoricians with several master pieces. She mostly focuses on scientific rhetorical analysis in argument, especially in word choice and figures of speech. Her notable works are Rhetorical Gigures in Science(2002), A Rhetoric or Argument(2003) with Marie Secor, Rhetorical Style: The Uses of Language in Persuasion(2011). The book A Rhetoric of Argument with Marie Secor discusses about arguments in four aspects: definition arguments, causal arguments, evaluation arguments and proposal arguments. These four aspects, now become standard in many argument texts, give readers a constructive, engaging way to analyze arguments by other writers and to construct their own arguments.

Susan Griffin is a fascinating activist whose unique utilization of rhetorical concepts both deeply emotionally engages and politically activates her audience. Born during the height of World War II, 1943, Griffin’s work has been dramatically molded by her experiences growing up in Los Angeles, California post-war. Griffin has written numerous books as well as plays, poems, and screenplays; all demonstrating and voicing her passion for ecology, gender, feminism, religion, racism, trauma, war, climate change, colonialism, history. Through her text, Griffin is able to manipulate rhetorical tools to her liking, engaging the audience in an immersive narrative that blends the personal, political, and historical. The story being told and the devices

Although Rick Perlstein and Liz Addison both wrote their article with the same purpose of appealing to the readers’ sense of emotion, credibility

    Throughout the essay Silko provides anecdotal evidence and facts to support her

Due to the readers being able relate, a connection of trust and persuasion is created between the author and the audience. Therefore, Thompson's arguments and claims are very convincing and provide enough evidence to the extent where the reader is comfortable reading and trusting

In an effort to persuade her audience that there are benefits to early exposure to technology, Eliana Dockterman builds her argument in her article, “The Digital Parent Trap”. Dockterman begins building her credibility with reputable sources, using logos appeal by statistics, and successfully employing opposing views to counter argue to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of her argument. By citing reputable sources such as school principals and an anthropologist from University of California at Irvine, Dockterman effective use of ethos strengthens the credibility of her article. Arguing that early exposure to technology is beneficial, it is only logical that Dockterman include a quote from “Shawn Jackson, principal of Spencer Tech”.

Furthermore, the type of examples Kluger, Aciman, and Steinmetz utilize involve strong data and facts to support their piece and make it more convincing. To illustrate, they describe, “ Just since 2004, the share of Americans who identify themselves as optimists has plummeted from 79% to 50%, according to a new Time poll. Meanwhile, more than 20% of us will suffer from a mood disorder at some point in our lifetimes and more than 30% from an anxiety disorder. By the time we 're 18 years old, 11% of us have been diagnosed with depression” (Kluger, Aciman, and Steinmetz 2). Given that their audience consists of more educated, well-read people, this evidence is particularly useful due to the fact it contains numbers and data that prove the writer 's’ main point and persuade their readers.

Stephanie Malinowski wrote an op-ed article questioning Thomas L. Friedman’s Optimism in “30 Little Turtles”. In addition, Malinowski criticizes Friedman when he generalized the Indians and how he based most of his article on his personal experience. Not to mention that Malinowski used quotes to support her evidence and make the reader question Friedman’s credibility. Malinowski is effective when she summarizes by telling the reader what she is criticizing, her use of paraphrasing to help the reader understand her point of view, and her use of quotes to support the evidence she gives. Summaries are used when someone uses the main points to explain something in a quick manner.

Scott Simon, the host of Weekend Edition Saturday and one of the hosts for NPR’s morning news podcast Up First, writes opinionated articles to share his take on events large and small. Through the choices Simon uses, he is able to grasp the attention of the citizens of America, his readers, and the followers of NPR. Simon uses a form of writing called epideictic rhetoric and supports it by establishing common ground by providing credible authors, facts, and personal experiences. He keeps a uniform look in his articles with certain types of appeal and diction to persuade his audience to accept his view on events. The type of writing Simon mainly uses is called epideictic rhetoric.

She did not offense the audience, but still make the point she is trying to approach. To conclude, the author uses persuasive writing styles, evidence and fact to persuade her audience that teenage texting is not as frequent as once believed. Throughout the passage, not only the features in the previous paragraphs are being used, she also gives many examples based on her own experiences to strengthen her logic and the persuasiveness of her essay. The author has distinctly presenting the point that texting is not as widespread as many people

Eliana uses a wide variety of persuasive techniques in her essay to craft an extremely well thought-out argument for why early exposure to technology can beneficial. As seen through out her article, Eliana considers possible facts to support her argument. She involves dozens of facts, statistics, and cause and effect to persuade her audience that technology (if used properly) can be a great tool toward success. So, by using these persuasive techniques she build her argument by using solid,strong proofs. Eliana is mindfully persuasive from the very beginning, introducing the topic by laying down the bridge of her argument by using well stated facts and statistics.

Eliana Dockterman builds her argument with evidence about ” Technology is good for kids “. She uses evidence about 12% of kids do better in SRI scores by playing video games than the people who don 't. Another evidence about technology is good for kids,” actively browsing pages on a computer or tablet is way more brain-stimulating than vegging out in front of the TV.” Kids can browse anything they want, those searches allows the kids brain learn more by surfing the web. Finally, Eliana Dockterman uses evidence to support her argument about technology is good for kids.

There has been a negative effect that teenager’s brain goes through and it does not let them think creatively and miss their brains up. Technology can go into positive and negative effect, but one thing that teenagers and parents cannot do is to stop using it for a long time. They get obsessed with it and you cannot get rid of these devices. Technology negatively affects brain development in children because usage affects their learning, and therefore technology use should be

It is a very clear argument for how the internet and technologies are harming us through many ways. Firstly, some of them said tablet devices led to some problems in our societies. Such as, isolation and turning inward and not to engage in the society around them and reduce physical activity, that leading to serious diseases such as obesity. (Mares & Woodward, 2005). The second argument is led to a lack of social skills.