Assignment 5: Anita Hill VS Clarence Thomas
Introduction
In 1991, Thurgood Marshall, the first African American to serve on the nation’s highest court retired. However, before Thurgood Marshall could retire, someone would have to take his place. In 1991, President George H. W. Bush nominated Clarence Thomas as an Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court where he would eventually be sworn in on October 23, 1991 (EEOC); But before Clarence Thomas was sworn into the U.S. Supreme Court, a scandal involving a college law professor arose. As soon as President Bush announced that he had nominated Clarence Thomas as the next Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, a law professor named Anita Hill submitted a confidential statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee alleging that Thomas had sexually harassed her a decade ago and two days
…show more content…
Her parents were farmers and she was the youngest of 13 children. Ever since Anita was a child, she earned straight As and eventually graduated as valedictorian of her class back in high school (Bio., 2015). After high school, Anita Hill attended Oklahoma State University where she graduated with honors and a B.A. in psychology. After finishing an internship, Anita Hill became interested in law and eventually applied and was accepted to Yale Law School. Anita Hill eventually obtained her J.D. from Yale Law School in 1980 (Bio., 2015). After school, Anita found work as an associate with a private law firm named Ward, Harkrader & Ross and in 1981, Anita Hill accepted a position as a legal adviser for Clarence Thomas (Bio., 2015). After working for Clarence Thomas for three years, Anita Hill became a professor at the University of Oklahoma’s College of Law. At this University, Anita taught contract and commercial law. Eventually in September of 1991, Anita Hill was approached by the Senate Judiciary Committee and questioned about the allegations against Clarence
Later O’Connor went to Stanford University and graduated with a bachelor’s degree, but it was hard to find a law job for a woman (“Sandra Day O’Connor”). O’Connor’s early
Justice Sonia Sotomayor was born on June 25th 1954 in the South Bronx area of New York to parents Juan and Celina Baez Sotomayor. Her parents who were of Puerto Rican descent moved their family to New York for a better opportunity for their children. Her parents worked hard to make a living her mother was a nurse a methadone clinic and her father worked with his hands and the family lived modestly within their means. Justice Sotomayor was diagnosed with type one diabetes at the age of seven and began taking insulin shot’s, shortly after her father died in 1963 when she was nine, leaving her mother as a single parent, during her upbringing her mother Celina placed a huge emphasis on the importance of education, pushing her children to become
Throughout history, civil rights have been a persistent issue, as far back as enslavement in the First Civilizations, such as Mesopotamia. With the issues however, a great many people have stood up for the rights of themselves and others. None of these people have been more prominent than Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Dr. King was the person who most impacted civil right because of the sheer number of people he captivated, as well as his calls for change being carried out in a nonviolent manner. Not many people have the power of persuasion, and even fewer possess it to the degree held by Dr. King. "
Sonia Sotomayor, the first Latina nominated for the Supreme Court, gave a speech to the Senate Judiciary Committee about her work experience as a judge and her outlook on education. Sotomayor speaks about her experinces as a judge, along with the hard work she put into her education that earned her scholarships into two Ivy League schools. Sotomayor’s purpose is to seek the support from the Senate Judiciary Committee by giving an image to show she is eligible to be in the Supreme Court. Sotomayor supports her purpose with her background story about her education and her occupations as a judge. Sotomayor uses rhetorical appeals and a grateful tone to persuade the committee she is an applicable candidate to be in the Supreme Court.
The film, Eyes on the Prize: Fighting Back, Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas is put to the test. During the Supreme Court case of Brown Vs The Board of Education, many people fought for schools to end segregation of the students. This means that black and white students would attend the same schools together. The Supreme Court case made its final decision and made it illegal to segregate students. Central High School was the school that let black students in first.
Her parents were divorced and she just wanted to get away from all of that. She received a full-ride scholarship to Iowa State University, the home of the Cyclones. She decided her path there would lead her to major in political science and later on she would go to law school. She was an
The events of history impact our daily lives in a dramatic way. As a result of the people who stood out and fought for our rights, society is able to voice its opinion and live freely. For example, Sojourner Truth fought for women’s rights and wanted society to look at individuals for who they were, not what their gender was. The minds of many were changed by these powerful advocates and our lives are affected by their actions.
In June 21, 1973, Miller was convicted on the ground of advertising the sale of what was considered by the court as adult material. He was found guilty as he broke the California Statute. The California Statute forbids citizens from spreading what is considered offensive in societal standards. The question that was being asked was that if the action of Miller was Constitution thus is protected under the law. However, he lost the case due to a vote of 5 - 4.
Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.
The Right to Abortion On January 22, 1973, in a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down it’s landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade, which recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians (Planned Parenthood). There are many moments in history when Roe v. Wade has been so close to being overturned, yet it is still in place. Abortion should stay legal, or not overturned, for the health of women everywhere. First, this important case took place at the time of abortion being illegal in most states, including Texas, where Roe v. Wade began.
I read A Piece of Cake: A Memoir. It was written by Cupcake Brown. This book was very inspiring and emotional. The story begins with a memory as to why her mother named her Cupcake. Cupcake 's mother died when she was 11.After that she got taken away from the family she knew.
Sonia Sotomayor, a US Supreme Court Justice, gave a lecture titled “A Latina Judge’s Voice”; in this lecture she argues that social identities matter for knowledge of the social world. In the context of the lecture she is referring to the judicial system, and she insists that one’s heritage, upbringing, and many other things that make up one’s social identity absolutely influence not only the decisions one makes but also the facts of a case that he or she chooses, or is even able, to see. In this paper I will assess Sotomayor’s arguments alongside Linda Martín Alcoff’s essay on Sotomayor’s lecture and an idea from other feminist writers to show that Sotomayor’s argument about social identities influencing social knowledge is not only convincing,
The university therefore conducted a second hearing under its “Abusive Conduct Policy”, which before was dissemination of the “Sexual Assault Policy”. The result of the second hearing, the Judicial Committee again found Morrison guilty and sentenced him to an alike 2-semester suspension. Morrison appealed his second conviction through the university’s administrative community. In 1995, Virginia Tech’s senior vice president set aside Morrison’s punishment. Virginia Tech believed that the ruling and punishment for Morrison was to “excessive” for the little information they had (CORNELL
Hill pursued his dream by graduating Howard University School of Law in 1933. Hill graduated with a friend, Thurgood Marshall, who would later help Hill with cases that dealt with segregation. Marshall graduated first in the
Justice Thurgood Marshall Response Justice Thurgood Marshall said in his “Reflections on the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution”, “I do not believe the meaning of the Constitution was forever ‘fixed’ at the Philadelphia Convention. Nor do I find the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice exhibited by the framers particularly profound. To the contrary, the government they devised was defective from the start, requiring several amendments, a civil war, and momentous social transformation to attain the system of constitutional government and its respect for the individual freedoms and human rights, that we hold as fundamental as today” (Marshall). In this passage of his essay, Judge Marshall is critical of the government that is