Compare And Contrast Civil War

Democratic-Republicans (anti-federalists) supported state and individual rights, along with a fear or tyranny. The two groups opposed each other but the Federalists tried to fix the issues which were mentioned by the Anti-Federalists. The two groups may have clashed and had many differences, though both came together and tried to compromise for the greater good of creating a new government that will last hundreds of years. The Democratic-Republicans feared a tyranny.

James Madison is probably the most well-known Federalist of his time. The Democratic-Republicans supported to have states have their own power, and was led pretty much by Thomas Jefferson.

Apart from this, they also contradicted leadership. The leader of the Federalist party believed that the government should be run by an educated aristocracy based on their birth, wealth, and position in society. Meanwhile, the leader of the Democratic-Republican party believed the government should be run by an educated aristocracy based on their talents and

Alexander Hamilton was a man who strongly believed in a powerful central government. This means he wanted the government to rule and have all the say. Thomas Jefferson was a man who strongly believed in the union of the states with government as a humble leader. The two opposing views caused two political parties to be born, The Federalists, and The Democratic-Republican Party. The Federalists would eventually cease in 1828 and The Democratic-Republican Party would spilt and become the two political parties of today.

In his Farewell Address, George Washington warned everyone of the dangers of political parties. However, the Federalists and Republicans had very different views. Alexander Hamilton and his fellow Federalists believed in a strong national government and that the best people should govern. On the other hand, Thomas Jefferson and Republicans believed that the national governmentś power should be limited and that power lies with the common men. These two men were completely different, and their completely different views sparked the political party rivalry.

Civil War Fighting Styles During the Civil War, The Union and Confederacy got into a war. The Union adapted the fighting style used by the Teutonics, while the Confederacy adapted to the fighting style used by the Celtic tribe. The fighting styles were very different and unique. It even shifted the tides of the war!

Hamilton favored the wealthy and those who had some kind of noble status. Those who were a Federalist believed, or somewhat believed, that they needed a strong central government. Thinking that needing a better reading of the constitution was unnecessary and was just a waste because they worried about who had more at stake to lose. The Democratic-Republicans was a political party that was led by Thomas Jefferson.

The Civil War marked a moment in American history with the metamorphosis of the meaning of the concept of liberty into one of freedom of opportunity. By examining the war between the Union and the Confederacy, James McPherson, in his book, Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution, he illustrates the issues present in antebellum and postwar America. The author defends the belief that the Civil War was a second revolution through a detailed look at key issues during the time period treating employment, land ownership, and education, among others. The extension of power of the national government that resulted from the war and Abraham Lincoln’s persuasive efforts to end the divide between the North and the South, led to an expansion

Comparison Essay In this essay I will be telling you about some of the biggest wars in American history. Those two wars are the Revolutionary War and the Civil war. They have some similarities, but they also have some differences. They were fought for two completely different reasons.

In the early Republic, there were two major parties: the Democratic Republicans and the Federalists. The Democratic Republicans were the strongest in the South, weakest in the Northeast but they still had a strong following. They believed that the country should have a weak central regime, they advocated for the rule of the people, and they strongly believed that national debt was a burden to the people. The Federalists in the same time were beginning to fade, but they still were minute.

“Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves.” - Abraham Lincoln. The two bloodiest wars on American soil were the Civil War and the Revolutionary War. Both affected America greatly. One formed America, the other reunited it.

In February 1861, a new government was on the horizon in the United States, known as the Confederate States of America. Composed of seven states from the South, this new government looked to separate from a union that they felt was tipping in power towards those who wanted to threaten the rights of the South, especially slavery. Similarly, in early 1775, colonists were preparing for revolution against a power that they felt oppressed their rights and wanted to take away their liberties. However, the Civil War was a not a complete representation of a second American Revolution. The Civil War was more than an unsatisfied party rebelling against a larger power, but a clash between two vastly different ways of life.

There were many differences between the North and the South. For instance, the South were very agricultural as opposed to the North which were industrial. The South used cheap labor in the form of slaves, whereas the North had workers do their jobs in factories at a faster pace. Because of sectionalism, competition between the north and the south began to increase.

In the North slavery wasn't practiced. The economy of the North was mainly dependent on industry. The North depended on the South for

There is little peace in a world characterized by painful differences between the rich and the poor, between the haves and the have-nots. Poverty is certainly not conducive to peace. Inequality in resources and opportunities is a direct burden on the poor themselves i.e. poor people as well as poor countries. When poverty is persistent, degrading, miserable, life-shortening, life-threatening, and life denying, it is an affront to human dignity. According to the orthodox Marxist thinking, wars are caused by class struggles, including conflicts within societies as well as those between the upper classes of different societies for control over other countries.