Comparison Of Letter From Birmingham Jail And The Perils Of Indifference

We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied to a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly”. King addresses the fact that even though at the time blacks are the ones being segregated upon, it still affects the white community, not just blacks. This quote is relevant to the entirety of the paper because the whole letter is focused on injustices and how they have affected

Civil rights leader and social activist Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a world renown correspondence, Letter From Birmingham Jail, in April of 1963, during a time when segregation was at it’s peak in the South. When King was making his mark in American history, the United States was experiencing great social unrest due to the injustice towards their colored citizens, which would lead to social rights rallies and unnecessary violence. In response to King’s peaceful protesting, the white community viewed “[his] nonviolent efforts as those of an extremist,” and subsequently imprisoned the pastor (para 27). King specifically wrote to the white clergymen who had earlier addressed a letter to him as to why he was apprehended, in which they argued that his actions were untimely and unconstitutional. In response, King emphasized that justice is never timely, and the refusal to acknowledge equal rights was inhumane and regressive.

In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Dr. King professes his disappointment with the white moderates for calling him an extremist for his schemes. At first, in paragraph 27, King does not deny the fact-by using anaphora- that there are some Negros who “advocate violence”, but he also asserts that there are even more for “nonviolent protest”(King 28). In making this comment, King urges for people to look at his acts of nonviolent protesting . Indeed the insignificant amount of violence will be more looked upon than the nonviolence; however, there are numerous acts nonvilence that should surpass this. Additionally, in paragraph 31, King states how at first he despised the label but then “gained [...] satisfaction” from it.

In the essay “Letters from Birmingham Jail” written by Martin Luther King, there were several values that he expounded on. Martin Luther King were willing to give his life for what he believe in. Two values were justice and freedom of rights. Martin Luther King provides a moral reason why he went to Birmingham. He went to battle and fight “injustice.”

Graded Assignment Unit Test, Part 2: Social Commentary Answer each question, using complete sentences. Total score: ____ of 60 points (Score for Question 1: ___ of 20 points) 1. What is the difference between the type of equality presented in “Harrison Bergeron” and that presented in “Letter from Birmingham Jail”? Answer this question in at least a paragraph and make sure to cite examples from the text.

One April 16th, 1963, Martin Luther King Jr., pastor and civil rights activist, in his speech entitled “Letter form Birmingham City Jail”, addresses social justice for all people. He supports his claims by first stating there is heritage and Americans will fight for what they deserve, then explaining we are doing the wrong thing to get the correct outcome, which is protesting for equality, and finally everyday people disobey the law to get the outcome they want. Through use of tone, rhetorical appeals, and rhetorical tools he effectively persuades the United States citizens to bring social justice to everyone across the United States of America King’s optimistic and encouraging tone promotes and livens the United States citizens. King’s speech

King states “I would agree with St. Augustine that ‘An unjust law is no law at all. ’”(King). As human beings it is our natural instinct to rebel against laws that are detrimental and unfair, this is what King refers to as unjust laws. Just laws would be those laws for the common good of society, which are unbiased. King’s whole argument is based around God.

Overall, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. annotates his advanced perception of injustice with many significant

You can’t break an unjust law and not make it known to everyone, you want people to know that you think it is unjust. King describes this as “difference made legal.” An unjust law is one which the majority makes a law in which minority has no say. Also, when that law is made it is expected of the minority to follow it but the majority does not abide by the same standards in obeying it. King uses the example of African Americans being

Civil Disobedience Martin Luther King once stated in "The Letter from Birmingham Jail", "Any individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust and willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment to arouse the conscience of the community over it injustice is in reality, expressing the highest respect for the law" (King 411). King meant that, if anyone feels a law is unjust and needed to expose its injustice, should willingly accept any penalty that comes in their way to help arouse people 's conscience in changing that law. In “The Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King explains the four powerful steps of the nonviolent campaign he used to protest against racial injustice for African-Americans

In paragraph 9 King states “there are two types of laws: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws (6),” and then continues with King stating “Now, what is the difference between the two? (7)” What is the difference between an unjust law and a just law? King goes on to explain that a just law is one that “squares with the moral

James Nuci Mr. Ottman English 11 AP 23 August 2017 Essay 21: Innovative author and presence on the Internet, Steven Johnson, in his excerpt from everything that is good for you; how today's popular culture is actually making us smarter (2005), publicizes that the general population would have dramatically different viewpoints if presented with different chronological circumstances. He supports his claim by first offering statistics that summarize pleasure readers' positive impact on society, then having readers visualize the world with certain circumstances, then breaking down two opposing sides of an argument, and then finally clarifying his own point of view on the topic. Johnson's purpose is to shine light on the controversial standpoint of many people on a certain topic, in order to allow readers to understand both sides of the argument along with their pros and cons. He creates a professional tone for people associated with pleasure reading or playing video games.

(Paragraph 4). This drew the clergymen’s attention to King’s beliefs and possibly made them realize the flaws in the system. King also states, “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law…” (Paragraph 5).

Now that king established the theory of Just and Unjust laws he then explains the difference between a just and unjust law, King says just laws “square with moral law” meaning the law agrees with the law of god. An unjust law is the opposite; the

King distinguishes between just and unjust laws by explaining the difference between them; he explains the moral affect each one has, the unfair way the majority used unjust laws, and the reason breaking unjust laws is okay. Now then, King uses morality to help explain the difference between just and unjust laws. King says “A just law is a man-made law that squares with the moral law or the law of God.” (356) He goes on to say “Unjust…….