Confederation Vs Constitution

600 Words3 Pages

The common definition we use of justice is just behavior or treatment. In relation to our United States government, this particular word means righteousness, equitableness or moral rightness. The Constitution aimed to better their original governing document called the Articles of Confederation and I do believe that the framers who shaped this made an immense amount of progress for our country, though do not stand for some of the policies they had to add.
Our first paper involved learning three important men in America’s history voicing their personal opinions on the Constitution and how to possibly fix some flaws. George Washington was very determined to have a strong central government so the country would act as one state in any decision, stating that “we should confederate as a nation”, meaning he believed that the United States would become weak if we did not agree. John Jay wanted all of the framers to have a sit-down and discuss how to create a better government and make it successful so nobody began to regret …show more content…

Starting with our Legislative that creates our laws, the Executive carries out these certain rules if passed, and the Judicial evaluates these regulations. Each of those branches individually are crucial to how America functions, but a prime example to show how they all collaborate together is the vetoing process. First seen inside the United States Constitution, the veto procedure “begins with the President if a bill gets passed from the Senate and the House of Representatives.” Those two groups mentioned are apart of Congress in the Legislative branch. Presuming with the entire process, “the Executive branch has to look at the document before making it into a law. He can either approve or reject it. If the House or Senate considers on overriding the President, two-thirds have to approve in order for the bill to become a

Open Document