Dictatorship In Texas

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott wants aborted babies to be buried or cremated instead of being treated like medical waste, according to his spokeswoman Ciara Matthews. The Health and Human Service Commission in Texas has proposed new rules that would require abortion service providers to either bury or cremate fetal remains as part of an effort to regulate these institutions. Health commissioner spokesman Bryan Black said the rules seek to maintain “the highest standards of human dignity,” the Texas Tribune relays.

The Texas Legislative Branch of Government The Texas Constitution divides the state government into three separate: the executive branch, the judicial branch, and the legislative branch. These three branches share equal power within the Texas State governemt. The executive branch is lead by the governor, the judicial branch consists of the Texas Supreme Court and the local courts around the state, finally, the legislative branch, is lead by the Texas Legislature, which includes the 150 members of the house of representatives and the 31 members of the state senate. These members of the house of representatives are elected to two-year terms and Senators serve four-year terms.

I believe that all members of the Texas legislature should be term-limited. I think that since the President of the United States has term-limited. It would only be fair that all branches within the government to practice term-limited as well. So far, there has only been fifteen states that practice term-limited (Maine, California, Colorado, Arkansas, Michigan, Florida, Ohio, South Dakota, Montana, Arizona, Missouri, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Louisiana, and Nevada). Term limits can be divided into two categories: consecutive and lifetime.

From the Constitution of Coahuila y Tejas of 1827 to The Texas Constitution of 1876, Texas has come a long way to preserve it unique constitution. With the fourth highest amendments in America, the present Texas constitution is known for its for extremely detailed, poorly written, and confusing nature. Like the national constitution, the Texas Constitution incorporates the principles of separation of power and representative democratic governance. Both constitutions provide a bicameral legislature. In like manner, the Texas Constitution contains a Bill of Rights and a system of diving power between the three branches government, legislative, executive, and Judicial.

Kari Davisson GOVT 2306-86021 Professor Summerlin 21 Sept. 2015 Texans’ Circle of Political Distrust Political and economic corruption in E.J. Davis’ Texas government before the Constitutional Convention of 1875 caused distrust of government by Texans. Texans especially do not trust government officials with their tax dollars, which has resulted in low taxes, low spending, and high federal aid. Without money to spend directly, Texas government officials have created numerous unfunded mandates, which still result in poor social programs and services.

Individualistic values in Texas support government activity only “to the extent that it creates opportunity for the individual achievement.” (Texas Political Culture). In other words, Texans are in favor of a limited state government and only encourage government activity when it is needed to create individual opportunities. The practice of an individualistic culture in Texas has created hostile views towards the state and federal government, and discourage their involvement in a number of

It operates under a plural executive system, where the governor and other executive officials are elected independently. Alaska, on the other hand, also has a governor and a bicameral legislature. However, it operates under a unified executive system, where executive officials, including the lieutenant governor, are elected on a single ticket with the governor. Texas has a larger state legislature compared to Alaska. It has a House of Representatives with 150 members and a Senate with 31 members, making it one of the largest state legislatures in the United States.

The Texas legislative process is governed by the Texas constitution as well as the House of Representative and the Senate. Its primary function is to enact laws to provide for the health, welfare, education, environment, and economic and general well-being of the citizens of Texas. It also establishes public policy through the passage of bills and resolutions and proposes amendments to the state constitution, which are then submitted to the voters for approval or disapproval. When a bill is proposed, it must go through the legislative process before it becomes a law. The legislative process is very long and has many steps.

Texas Political Culture There are multiple classifications for political cultures Moralistic political culture- ones believe that the government should promote the public good and in order to ensure that good the citizens should participate in politics and civic activities Individualistic political culture- ones believe that the government must limit their role when providing to society in order to make the citizens able to pursue their economic interests Traditionalistic political culture- ones believe that the government should controlled by political elites and must be guided by tradition. Changes in Texas

The Texas Revolution has played a massive role in Texas history. In fact, without it, Texas wouldn’t be Texas! But, why was there a Texas Revolution to start with? In this essay, we will be discussing why there was a Texas Revolution and who was there to start it.

Although Texas government is democratic, the rich and educated make most of the decisions according to Texas politics, 6th Edition. Government-refers to the institutions in which decision are being made that resolve conflicts or allocate benefits and privileges. Institution refers to an ongoing organization that performs certain functions for society. Another report by the National Bureau of Census shows that Texas is in the top 10% of citizens below poverty line. With such wealth inequality in Texas, is no wonder minorities tend to be less involved.

The framers of the Texas Executive established a system that was designed to check the powers of the government. As opposed to the US Constitution that vested the power of the executive in the president of the nation (Berry, 1385), the Texas Constitution sought to ensure that the state did not have the excess powers. As such, they came up with a plural system where a variety of individuals make up the executive branch of the state (Texas State Government at a Glance). While the governor of the state remains as the highest ranking officials in the state, they hold the least of powers in the plural system.

While the president can veto an entire bill the governor only has the power to veto a part of the bill. Another thing is that the governor cannot form cabinet and the president can. Yet governors still play an important role after all the restrictions. “But despite having fewer resources and more limitations, modern governors can be successful in implementing their priorities and policies.” (Texas Politics-

The Constitution of 1876 was toward the end in the development of a new, restructured and revised constitution in Texas, yet it was not the last attempt to revise the natural law of Texas. Pressure begin to build to change and streamline the Texas Constitution in the late 1960s. By 1969, fifty-six obsolete and out dated provisions were revoked, including a whole article. This called for a more fundamental overhaul and restructuring of the Constitution, which led to an extensive and prolonged process of constitutional revision that began in the 1970s. Efforts during this time were imperative for two reasons: it explained a long-standing concern whether the legislature had the constitutional right to convene as a constitutional convention; and secondly, the Texas Constitutional Revision Commission provided a thorough revision of the state constitution that served as the foundation for a new

To win any kind of election/re-election candidates must work to please voters. Here in Texas where a majority of people have a strong pro-death penalty stance, judges must also have a strong stance regarding the death penalty if they would like to remain in office. This is concerning because judges will be more likely to seek he death penalty for the convicted so they can create a record of toughness to win over voters. Some elected judges are sometimes of lesser quality than appointed judges in other states, but since they have a record of toughness everything else is thrown out the window. District attorneys also try to maintain a tough reputation as well.