Difference Between Functionalism And Conflict Theory

727 Words3 Pages

When discussing functionalism and conflict theory, one has to look at the beliefs of the theorists who created and contributed to these theories. One of the main theorist behind functionalism was Emilie Durkheim, while Karl Marx was the main proponent of conflict theory. These two theories both view society as a system of social structures and agree that these social structures exist within a society. However, they differ greatly in that functionalism views society as a large system working together for the good of the people. While conflict theory believes that society is set into place, and will vary depending on the wealth and power of the people involved (Dottin). In conflict theory, there is a constant struggle between those who have, and those who have not. Society is ran by those who have money and power, and because of this there will always be inequality, and no one will ever be at peace or harmony. Functionalism is the study of society as a functioning system. It’s often known as the consensus theory due to the fact that in functionalism everything works together, there is complete agreement. It doesn’t take into account social factors that may affect aspects of life. On the contrary, it views society as a system in which all parks work together to make everything work in consensus (Dottin). Emilie Durkheim said, “There are two types of men: the great and the small” (Durkheim). This leads us into the discussion of the inequality of functionalism. In

Open Document