Does Nationalism Lead To Genocide In The 20th Century

Nationalist that raged a war or genocide creates terror, destruction of society and destroys relationships. The hostile environment is not solely achieved by supporting the cause of violence, but extra -lethal activities play a role in adding more violence to the environment. The essay discusses the chapter 7 called Sideshows from Show Time: The Race, Power and Violent Display by Lee Ann Fujii. The chapter explains why is it important to look at ‘extra-lethal’ activities that are the sideshows of the war or genocide. Nationalist ruthless acts are the extra lethal activities that did not happen during the midst of the war or genocide and are transgression.

The act of genocide carried out by a group’s oppressors characterizes itself in the intimate knowledge the oppressor has of the group’s social, cultural, and political institutions. Raphael Lemkin describes genocide as an act of anti-sociology where the perpetrator destroys a group’s societal institutions to destroy them in whole or in part. This destruction is described by Lemkin as an anti-sociology because of its targeting of all aspects of a group’s societal institutions: political, social, cultural, economic, biological, physical, religious, and moral. (Lemkin, Chapter IX: Section 2). Genocide destroys a group’s social, individual, political, and cultural connections as demonstrated by the Armenian and Native American genocides where

In 1944, a Polish-Jewish lawyer came up with the word, “genocide.” However, even seventy-five years later, many people still debate what factors go into making a genocide. Of course, there is mass murder, mistreatment of large groups of people, and difficult life conditions. Take the Cambodian Genocide, for example. People were tortured and killed so much during this genocide that at one of the death camps, “as few as 12 managed to survive” (Pierpaoli).

Since the Holocaust there have been many more genocides with some even exceeding the death count of the Holocaust, but none have been more impactful on modern society as the

Genocides, the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular group or nation, has affected various countries. Genocide not only brings a war but also problems like decreasing economic affairs and social problems. When genocide starts, society overlooks economic affairs like their agriculture since they focus on the war. In the case of Rwanda, once the genocide had begun many farmers fled or were killed. "All was

On the other hand, Shaw argues that warfare is degenerate in nature. Therefore one can argue that propaganda and the demonization of entire nations during war matched with indiscriminate violence makes acts of war ultimately acts of genocide. This argument is particularly compelling when corresponded with the casualty rates of modern

Nationalism is a powerful force that unifies large groups of people based on commonalities such as ethnicity or religion. There are numerous examples of nationalistic forces throughout the 20th century, such as rationing and the home front that took place in WWI, the Red Army and the CCP of the Interwar Years, and ultranationalistic Nazi Germany and Japan in WWII. Nationalism is the driving force behind many of the world’s greatest accomplishments and atrocities and it helped to shape the world in the 20th century because it contributed to the WWI effort, set the stage for WWII, and caused two significant atrocities during the second World War. WWI displays nationalism in the way that home countries drew support for the war effort and rationed food for their soldiers. During the WWI effort,

Genocide is the act of mass murdering groups of people because of someone 's disliking. In other words getting rid of people or stop their existence,mostly because of their religion, ethnic, or race. One of the most atrocious ones was the Armenian Genocide(April 24,1915-1916), in which 1.5 million of the Armenian population, living in the Ottoman Empire were either deported or killed. During this time,the Turkish government had planned the genocide to get rid of the entire Armenian population in the Ottoman Empire(which was one of the largest empires to rule on the border of the Mediterranean Sea) because they feared that the Armenian community would join their enemy troops during WWI in 1915.

Nationalism has too often been dismissed as an irrational creed due to its association with disastrous results over the decades. But undeniably, it is a dominating force in contemporary international politics. It is important to understand nationalism if we want to understand global political developments. Many books have been written on this subject, but David Miller’s On Nationality stands out. This book takes on a distinctive approach to the study of nationalism, rendering it one of a kind in this field.

What is nationalism? Nationalism holds a lot of definitions; nationalism is the belief that a member of a nation shares the same interest but that different from other’s nations and different from the interests of another nation or human race. Furthermore, it is a thought by nationalists that the national interests are more important and powerful than the other interests that exist between members who belong to the nation. Nationalism political philosophy, that the welfare of the nation state considered utmost importance. nationalism is basically a state of mind and conscious, and their first duty is loyalty for the nation state.

Genocide is not something to happen over one night, without any early warnings. There should be institutions and organization to use from the different strategy to recognize the early warnings. The genocide convention is to understand the early warnings that how it occurs and understanding that signs can help and lead to inhibit the genocide and make sure such incident do not happen in the future (Albright and Cohen). Kofi Annan, the UN Secretary General had mentioned five points in order to predicate and prevent any genocide: “1. Prevent armed conflict, which usually provides the context for genocide;2.

For several decades various cultures have been rich with history and traditions that transcended time. However these cultures go through very dark times such as genocide. Genocide is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, specifically those of a particular ethnic group or nation. On one hand neutrality is a positive alternative of genocide because if a country stays neutral, that country would likely have peace. On the other hand being a bystander or being neutral is letting thousands of innocent lives die at your hands.

Nationalism is the idea that a people who have much in common, such as language, culture and within the same location ought to organize in such a way that it creates a stable and enduring state. Nationalism is tied to patriotism, and it is the driving force behind the identity of a culture. Nationalism had many effects in Europe from 1815, The Congress of Vienna and beyond. Nationalism brings people together in a way and people can feel belong to something. Factors include Prince Metternich, the middle class in countries get involved, and ideas of imperialism and many others brought people together as one to be called nationalism.

The 20th century labelled, “the most violent century in human history” (golding). To explain the violence of the 20th century if one must look at all events of the intentionally harm done to others. This includes the violence caused by the two hundred and fifty-six wars inluding World War One and two, The Vietnam War, The Cold War which where almost 108 milion human lives have persihed and others haunted by the gruesome details that occurred during these events. One must also look at the the violence caused by seven genocides including the Holocaust, Armenian Genocide and Rwandan Genocide which killed eighteen million people.

Often described as Europe’s deadliest conflict since the Second World War, the Yugoslavian war, which lasted from 1991 to 2001, was cradled by the shift in the international balance of power from the cold war’s bipolarity to contemporary unipolarity. The conflict often connotes the euphemism “ethnic cleansing”, which was coined in order to describe the rampant genocidal trends that plagued the civil war. But, what caused this nation state to be torn by such a vicious conflict? This question is often answered with a Manichean interpretation: The antagonists, the Serbs led by Slobodan Milosevic's genocidal aspirations martyrized the innocent Bosnian Muslims for more than a decade. Although, there certainly is some truth to this simplistic statement,