Elie Wiesel's Formal Speech The Perils Of Indifference

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

Wiesel's assertion on indifference is portrayed in the crises of the “Armenian Genocide” it involved 1.5 million deaths. Caused by a man name Talaat pasha also known as “Turkish Hitler.” Talaat manufactured lies, one which the armenians had to be killed because they were ” rebelling.” The second reason was that they had to be killed because the Armenians were siding with “our enemy” the russians. However, in Elis speech “ The Perils of Indifference” he states “ It’s so much easier to look away from the victims” meaning that it easier to not pay attention to the negative things that are occuring.

Mr. Wiesel was one of the many victims who were locked away in Hitler’s concentration camps. What’s more, he was a child when it happened. Therefore he presented the speech with much emotion and heart, having personal knowledge on the subject. A large amount of the speech was about how indifference affected the war in such a negative way.

“Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor - never his victim”(Perils of Indifference) said Elie Wiesel, survivor of the Holocaust in his Perils of Indifference speech. In his speech he explains a little about his experience throughout the holocaust, but mainly about why he is so against indifference. While in his Nobel Peace Prize winning book, Night, he describes in depth about his journey through concentration camps and what he witnessed along the way. Indifference is a big topic of his, and it is now a matter of what illustrates the topic better, Night or Perils of Indifference.

This was not supposed to happen Jewish people feel like they're trapped they're all alone they can't fight they have no weapon the only weapon they have other voices just to know that one person or one voice can speak over millions is crazy no one would ever expect this to be happening or that being the way it was in the 1940s all rows have to be civilized and we have peace. what I think about Elie Wiesel is that you are important just Who You Are no matter what who anyone else can't be or can be be yourself you are special the way you are no one can tell you different. What has happened won't happen again. we will have to teach our kids what what we know so this doesn't happen again. our leader will not let this happen again.

When I hear the word Genocide I think of the Holocaust and other sorts of disaster made by man. The Holocaust was started by a man named Adolf Hitler Hitler he had a dream in his dream he imagined a world he controlled and it was ridded of Jews. Anne Frank was a ordinary teen girl who loved to talk with her friends and bake, she even baked some cookies for her classmates. Then the nazis came and take away their freedom Anne and her family can 't leave the house and go in public for risk of being caught so they went into hiding in a annex they stay in hiding for 2 years but they got caught and arrested by the Gestapo and died in a concentration camp but her father lived to publish her diary.

One of the utmost irrational mistakes of mankind is Genocides. Genocides are consistently repeated throughout all of history. Seventeen million people died in World War I. In comparison, three million people have died during the Cambodia Genocide. In half the time that each major power took to stop fighting. The social integrity of Cambodia collapsed on its self, killings equaled 27% of the death of World War I. As a matter of fact, the Indochina War is what caused Cambodia 's damaging self infliction.

The general statement made by Elie Wiesel in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, is that indifference is sinful. More specifically, Wiesel argues that awareness needs to be brought that indifference is dangerous. He writes “Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end”. In this speech, Wiesel is suggesting that indifference is dangerous it can bring the end to many lives. In conclusion Wiesel's belief is suggesting that indifference is an end, it needs to be noticed and taken care of.

Elie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.

In the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of

Unfortnely that is different than other genocides we say never again for the holocaust, which is done, however genocides go on every single day in various places. In Africa, Darfur, is still taking place today believe it or not. We cant stop all the other genocides happening daily its is beyond over all our control. Darfur is located in Sudan that consists of mostly volcanic highlands. Darfur has a population of around 6 million people.

Wiesel’s speech shows how he worked to keep the memory of those people alive because he knows that people will continue to be guilty, to be accomplices if they forget. Furthermore, Wiesel knows that keeping the memory of those poor, innocent will avoid the repetition of the atrocity done in the future. The stories and experiences of Wiesel allowed for people to see the true horrors of what occurs when people who keep silence become “accomplices” of those who inflict pain towards humans. To conclude, Wiesel chose to use parallelism in his speech to emphasize the fault people had for keeping silence and allowing the torture of innocent

In his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, Elie Wiesel strives to inform his audience of the unbelievable atrocities of the Holocaust in order to prevent them from ever again responding to inhumanity and injustice with silence and neutrality. The structure or organization of Wiesel’s speech, his skillful use of the rhetorical appeals of pathos and ethos, combined with powerful rhetorical devices leads his audience to understand that they must never choose silence when they witness injustice. To do so supports the oppressors. Wiesel’s speech is tightly organized and moves the ideas forward effectively. Wiesel begins with humility, stating that he does not have the right to speak for the dead, introducing the framework of his words.

Elie Wiesel's speech "Hope, Despair and Memory" uses all three types of rhetorical strategy. This speech was a powerful combination of pathos,logos, and ethos used to make people remember. Wiesel says "[We thought] It would enough to describe a death-camp "selection", to prevent human right to dignity from ever being violated again" to appeal to the listeners sense of compassion or empathy for those who suffered the atrocities of the war. This would also be called using pathos rhetorical strategy.

The entire world was so ignorant to such a massacre of horrific events that were right under their noses, so Elie Wiesel persuades and expresses his viewpoint of neutrality to an audience. Wiesel uses the ignorance of the countries during World War II to express the effects of their involvement on the civilians, “And then I explain to him how naive we were, that the world did know and remained silent. And that is why I swore never to be silent when and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation” (Weisel). To persuade the audience, Elie uses facts to make the people become sentimental toward the victims of the Holocaust. Also, when Weisel shares his opinion with the audience, he gains people onto his side because of his authority and good reputation.