Essay On Plebiscite In Australia

ASSESS THE SUCCESS OF THE 1967 REFERENDUM IN RELATION TO SOCIAL, POLITICAL, LEGAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGES IN THE RIGHTS OF ABORIGINAL PEOPLES. USE THE DOCUMENTS BELOW AND YOUR OWN RESEARCH. HAND IN A COMPLETED MINDMAP AND THE FINISHED ESSAY. LOOK AT THE DOCUMENTS AND THE VIDEOS TO HELP. On the 27th of May 1967, a Federal referendum was held to change the Constitutional law in Australia.

of Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders in the late 1950’s. This began an era of change. The 1960’s brought significant changes in Aboriginal affairs.

This analyses that same sex couples should also have the right to marry. One of the reason why the supreme court sided with Loving was because “Decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can

Same-sex marriages can help add more money to the wedding industry, it can help decrease cost of state benefits, it can add more revenue to the whole state, denying them the right to marry goes against the fourteenth amendment, it would be the right source of action since they face discrimination, denying someone the right to marry means that you are denying them happiness, religious leaders support it because it bring peace in the communities, they support it because they see everyone as God’s children and they support it because, in the bible, the term marriage meant just between two women and the term didn’t regard to gender. Same-sex marriages can very important essence to help boost the economy because it can help during times when a state is going through a crisis like they don’t have a lot of employment. Don’t have funds to improve communities or it can help the entire country fund into healthcare, education and---- which can improve some nay lives. Allowing a ban on same-sex marriage is a bad example towards the next generations of children. It’s teaching them that it’s ok to discriminate certain people.

Impact litigation is rare here compared to other common law jurisdictions. Cases that are run are usually small-scale and lack an organising political framework. Perhaps for this reason, Australian test cases have generally fallen short of achieving meaningful social or political change. By contrast, U.S. test cases are typically deployed as part of a larger strategy by civil rights groups and have an impressive track record for advancing the rights of the marginalised. An example is the recent U.S. Supreme Court litigation which resulted in the legalisation of gay

The backlash on the ruling is much warranted. I say this because if we took a national poll, the ruling would be that gay marriage would not be allowed. We live in a democratic society where the people "should" rule but as always, the government has the final say. Although I do agree with the backlash and understand why it is happening I still hold firm to my belief that they should still be allowed to marry. I believe this because if my neighbors who are both males were to marry each other, why or how does that influence or affect my life.

The current status of the gay rights movement: last month the Supreme Court pass the rule that all 50 states have legal right to marry same sex. Victories for gays and lesbians is, that they can legally obtain the marriage license. Nothing still needs to be achieved. I would say that gays and lesbians will still continue to obtain more rights in the future. Since it legal to all 50 states, there should be no unsettling, should be only uniformity of laws regarding gay marriage across the Unites States.

Australia is a Democracy Never before have there been so many democracies in the world or so many competitive elections conducted at national, subnational and region levels. Democracy is now prescribed as inseparable from good governance and an antidote to corruption. The key aspects of what makes Australia a democracy being the electoral role, Australian Electoral Commission (AEC), referendumsm, the rule of law The separate colonies of Australia gained self-government during the nineteenth century and less than half a century later Australia became the first nation to vote itself into existence through popular referendum. How does Australia’s democracy in today’s modern age stack up on those early days of a fledgling democracy.

Laws are now in place to protect everyone, despite their gender preference. No matter what one believes about the previous statements, the idea of equality is necessary to a democracy and has worked, though many have waded through rough waters, for the United

Victoria makes a valid point, “the government does not have the right to impose a certain minority or majority based on a religion within our state (21:10).” I believe this to be true however this makes laws controversial. Each religion has their own beliefs and way of life therefore universal laws are hard to pass such as same sex marriage. Sandels solution to this is “the government should try to make these laws neutral with respect to these competing moral and religious views (27:00).” This is a great idea but I’m not sure it is possible considering there are so many different religions with different views in

In today’s world, it seems to be that women have the same rights as men, but it wasn't always this way. The speech “Women’s Rights to Suffrage” by Susan B Anthony is the most compelling of all. Susan B Anthony persuades the audience that all women should have the same rights as men. It’s shown through the speech that the federal constitution says “we the people”, the government has no right to take away rights from just one gender, and that women are considered people as well. The fact that the constitution says “we the people” is a primary point in this speech.

You are in the paleolithic era, wearing nothing but animal skin to protect you from the elements. You go back to your tribe and find that a woman comes back with the majority of the food for the tribe. You and the rest of the tribesmen eat than go and pray to a goddess, thanking her for giving birth to you and the world you live in. Women and Goddesses were worshipped for their life giving abilities and beauty. In many creation stories from many indigenous peoples, a goddess was the one that either created the world ro people, or both.

Parliamentary sovereignty is a feature of Britain political system, it is a key principle of the U.K.’s uncodified constitution. Parliamentary sovereignty makes the Parliament the supreme legislative authority of Westminster which means Parliament has the right to make, amend and repeal laws. Overall, the courts cannot overrule the legislation unlike in other constitutions like the United states of America. No Parliament can pass laws that future Parliament cannot change. Although generally the U.K is often referred to having an unwritten constitution this is incorrect, in fact the UK has an uncodified constitution.

In the United States, people always talk about freedom and equality. Especially they want elections could be more democratic. In American Democracy in Peril, Hudson’s main argument regarding chapter five “Election Without the People’s Voice,” is if elections want to be democratic, they must meet three essential criteria, which are to provide equal representation of all citizens, to be mechanisms for deliberation about public policy issues, and to control what government does. Unfortunately, those points that Hudson mentions are what American elections do not have. American elections do not provide equal representation to everyone in the country.

Voting been such a great succes in the USA, It been around ever since 1948. Voting is choosing between many things rather you like then in your own opinion or you dont. Every year the vote population grows in America. You could be debating rather you would like your favor food to be surve in your school, you cold be debating rather you would want to drive in the agre of 17. But when it comes to real voting it takes alot of responsibilty.