Essay On Why College Athletes Should Be Paid

Why College Athletes should not get Paid Wouldn't you want your college to be a fair place? College athletes are not paid because fans could lose interest if the players had been expert athletes. Paying all college athletes involves a number of tough enterprises and money, so for universities to be an awesome and fair region for all students colleges generally choose to now not to pay college athletes. College athletes need to know not to be paid because these athletes chose to be athletes, and also no one has sufficient money to pay everyone, so there could now not be any equality, however, some argue that athletes spend all their time and don’t get what they deserve returned. Different programs within the college could be erased if college athletes receive a commission consistent with maryville.edu “athletes will diminish the spirit of amateurism” this means that if students get a possibility to receive a commission at college they may never need to pick some other class which can have an effect on their future.

Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.

Let’s face it some schools have more money set to sports than others. So if college athletes started getting paid some schools would be better off than others. Lets say that a kid from Sioux Falls that excels at football decides he wants to play football in college. If student athletes got paid that student would be more likely to play at a school like Alabama versus a smaller school closer to home that wouldn’t pay him quite as much like University of South Dakota.

College athletes frequently put in a lot of time, effort, and risk, but they don't always receive the credit or compensation they deserve from the NCAA and the schools they represent. One factor as to why college athletes should

College students are notorious for being at a financial disadvantage throughout their years pursuing higher education. In many cases, this leads them to pick up part-time or even full-time work to help pay for their expenses. But what about those who are not blessed with the time to have a job due to their hectic schedule? College athletes are who I am referring to. They are practically the property of the school who trade their time and health in exchange for an opportunity to make it to the professional leagues.

College athletes undertake quite the journey the instant they make the decision to dive into that pool, shoot that winning goal, or fulfill whatever their heart desires. These talented athletes have to manage their academic life, their personal life, and their athletic life all at once, which can prove to be a fairly difficult task, and considering that the only financial benefits they receive from it are scholarships, its understandable why some might be a bit disgruntled that they are not paid directly. However, paying college athletes is in no way a good idea, as this could lead them to neglect their academic life, and even take a major chunk out of an entire college's funding. If colleges started paying their athletes, it could cause them

Gaines’ graph, “Revenue Generated by Division 1 Athletic Departments,” depicts the revenue that athletic departments receive from athletes. Athletes are responsible for generating enormous revenues for colleges, but they do not receive any reparations for this. Athletic departments have the ability to give financial compensation to athletes, but they selfishly choose not to for the benefit of

College tuition is a big expense, as many people know, but for some people this expense may be covered by receiving a scholarship for academics and/or athletics. As a grade 12 student athlete I have been paying more attention to tuition and scholarships lately, one thing I have come to realize is; not every college or university athlete receives compensation for playing. College and university athletes typically struggle in their programs and deal with a lot of stress because of how demanding their sports and studies are, it's also extremely hard to effectively time manage and get everything done. Another thing to highlight is how difficult it is to become an athlete in a post secondary setting. An additional thought that comes to mind is what

“College athletes don’t have to worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of on-campus living, and meal plans” (McCauley). These student athletes are still going to college, hence the name college athletes. They are not professionals, and this is not the big leagues. A scholarship can take care of a big portion of the cost to go to college. Even if it doesn’t cover the whole cost, they are still paying a lot less than a regular student going to college.

Many people may argue that by paying college athletes it will take away from the sports themselves because the athletes will be only focused on the money. While making money from playing their respective sport will change certain aspects of the game, it will not make it less competitive or enjoyable to watch. The money that these young men and women will make will not change their competitiveness and love for the game, it will only ensure that they are able to make ends meet by providing themselves with necessities. College athletes put in countless hours towards their sport, and they deserve compensation in

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.

The NCAA profits unfairly from athletes,“ The NCAA, colleges, and universities profit unfairly from the work and likenesses of college athletes”(Procon.org). It shows that colleges profit unfairly from the players and don't give the players any of the money. It is wrong not to pay college athletes because they have expenses to pay for and they need money to

" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.