Ethics Of Legalizing Marijuana

1092 Words5 Pages

Marijuana Legalization Whether marijuana should be allowed to be advertised legally in states where it is accepted still remains a concern. While federally illegal, states where it is legal argue that they should be allowed to advertise their product in order to reach a profit in their business. In this essay, I will argue the positive and negative outcomes of legalizing marijuana to be advertised in the states it is allowed in order to understand the effect on society more fully. While marijuana might be rejected by others in the community of the states where it is legal, some have decided to make this product their business and, furthermore, made this their way of living. According to ethics, it is ethically suitable for a business to …show more content…

While this is agreed upon by many, restaurant owners and others argue that this causes food to be too consistent and, furthermore, makes it more costly to package a product. In this essay, I will argue the positive and negative points of calorie labeling in order to give a better view on the argument. On one hand, requiring certain food sellers to label the calories on the package of the food will allow consumers to know what they are eating, which indirectly impacts their food choices. This allows consumers to make better choices when it comes to eating, or at least make them aware of their choice if they choose otherwise. In many cases, this will decrease obesity simply by making people more conscious about what they are eating. (FDA, 2015) Some foods are very unhealthy and, in addition, are offered at a very low price, which manipulates minds. Because of this, there needs to be nutritional information on the package to display that the item is not healthy for routinized daily consumption. On the other hand, consumers will also be faced to make a decision now knowing how bad something is for them. This will allow some consumers to choose a healthier alternative if they know what is better for them and actually care. Therefore, this has a positive …show more content…

Restaurant owners contradict this regulation by stating that this causes food to be too consistent, which is true. It is hard to maintain the same quantity of ingredients for the same quantity of meat and cook the exact same way every time. This puts a burden on the restaurant owners of large chains because it decreases efficiency when it comes to producing food quickly. It is hard to keep a direct measure on everything while cooking. In addition, other business owners who handle packaged foods argue that it raises costs of packaging. This is a problem as well because this interferes with making a bigger profit, which is always in the picture. Requiring nutritional information on food products is acceptable, but when it cuts into profits of business owners it is perceived as a regulation against business owners, rather than an equal regulation to better society. This regulation is basically asking every restaurant to produce each food item identically, and for every packaged food handler to be consumers’ parents by reminding them of what they are eating. Therefore, not everyone is happy with the

Open Document