In the history textbooks of today’s educational institution, within the pages somewhere you can locate it stating either directly or indirectly that Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. Although that point is arguably true, you have to analyze his true motives and reasoning behind the emancipation proclamation. It’s understood that the primary object of the civil war was to preserve and restore the union over all states. Although, this was arguably the original reason, a disclosure made by Colonel Baldwin of the aims of the head of that party, are sufficient to prove that the real purpose was for other than the fabrication - to enlarge and perpetuate the power of his faction. Before the Civil war began Abraham Lincoln was clear about his focal …show more content…
Georgia secedes on January 19, 1861. Six days following Georgia, Louisiana secedes as well. Kansas admits to the union on January 29, 1861. On the other hand, on February 1, 1861 Texas secedes from the union. February 8, 1861 the confederate sates of America was formed. Arkansas, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia shadowed the confederate states of America and seceded later after the battle of fort Sumter. The seceding start on December 20, 1860 was a result of the southern population being Convinced that their way of life, based on slavery, was irretrievably threatened by the election of President Abraham Lincoln (November 1860), the seven states of the Deep South (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas) seceded from the Union. April 12, 1861 The Civil war officially begins with the battle of Fort Sumter. This shows the accurate motives of Abraham Lincoln and The Civil war because it verifies that he initiated the war after the states seceded from the union and attempted to form their own country (the confederate states of …show more content…
Abraham Lincoln wrote to Greeley “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it,” Now does this mean he was pro-slavery? No. Although it doesn’t mean that he was pro-slavery, you must concede that this shows that he wasn’t actively against slavery either. I admitted the word “actively” in my last statement because he has spoken out about how he disagrees with slavery. Later on in the same letter he does write “and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union;” This clarify his stand-point about the union and slavery. At this particular point in time he doesn’t necessarily care too much about slavery but more about anything that could benefit the union−and if that is freeing slaves then he is an active advocate for that. Abraham Lincoln is a man of many faces because he tells Joshua Speed that he total disagree with some of the practices of slavery in 1855 which was years before the seceding of states and the civil war. He writes “I leave that matter entirely to yourself. I also acknowledge
One of the most surprising election would be the election of 1860. In this election, Lincoln again confronted Douglas, who represented the Northern group of a strongly separated Democratic Party in addition to Breckinridge and Bell. The declaration of Lincoln 's triumph flagged the severance of the Southern states, which since the start of the year had been openly undermining withdrawal if the Republicans picked up the White House. When Lincoln was instated on March 4, 1861, seven states had withdrawn, and the Confederate States of America had been formally settled, with Jefferson Davis as its chose president. After one month, the American Civil War started when Confederate powers under General P.G.T. Beauregard opened fire on Union-held Fort
After 7 states seceded from the Union, war was inevitable. Lincoln made the decision to fight not because of his beliefs about slavery, but because he felt he had the obligation to protect the Union at all costs. The Civil War began when the South attacked Fort Sumter, South Carolina, on April 12, 1861. Lincoln was blamed for the attack with his decision to resupply the fort, which had become an outpost for a hostile nation. The Southern navy then fired the first shot of the war at Fort Sumter.
I believe that the slaves freed themselves, and that Abe Lincoln only helped make it possible. During the civil war Lincoln was backed into a corner when slavery popped up. He argued that the war was not about freeing slaves but to preserve the union. However, when refugee slaves were found helping the confederacy Lincoln freed them as a contraband of war, as stated by pbs, “Though "contraband" slaves had been declared free, Lincoln continued to insist that this was a war to save the Union, not to free slaves. “.
Many southerners believed that they should break away or secede, from the United States. In December 1860, almost two months after Abraham Lincoln was elected president South Carolina decided to secede. By February 1, 1861, six more states – Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Georgia, Louisiana, and Texas-had seceded. Representatives from the seven seceding states meet in Montgomery, Alabama. On February 8, they formed their own government.
Lincoln talks about the union in Document G and said the following: “But you say that sooner than yield your legal right to the slave—especially at the bidding of those who are not themselves interested, you would see the Union dissolved.” If the South successfully separated from the North the Confederacy would no longer be under the control of the Union and Lincoln’s access to freeing the slaves would minimal. This “new nation” that Lincoln was trying to create and put into effect had a strong foundation based upon Constitutional rights which declare that all men are created equal. Yes, maybe Lincoln at this point wanted to keep the Union together, which can most definitely be perceived as racist too but slavery on the back burner for the time being, but in the end, he encouraged and defended the rights of all humans.
After Lincoln won South Carolina seceded, soon after the rest of the south did, starting the Civil
Have you ever wonder why all good people that want change the world for the good most of time get killed? Well that is the same thing that happened to Abraham Lincoln. Abraham Lincoln was the 16th president of the United States of America, civil rights activist and talked about the emancipation about slaves. Abraham would talk about the unfair treatment to slaves and when a law was passed. But many southerners thought that he was wrong for abolishing slavery.
Lincoln was aware that the abolition of slavery could make or break the Civil War for the Union when he wrote the Emancipation Proclamation. Though his proclamation was originally written as a military tactic it would and was intended to, have a huge impact on the slaves. The Emancipation Proclamation helped the slaves in that it made a new goal
After the election of President Lincoln in 1860, all tensions within the country had come to a head. At that time, eleven southern states seceded from the Union and on April 12, 1861, the Confederates attack Fort Sumter and the Civil War officially
. From those 500,000 laborers, 200,000 black soldiers and circumnavigators, a multitude of them were former veterans, served in the armed forces (Holzer). The North now had more strategies and tactics. The discharged captives could also barricade forts, positions, stations, and other locations, and to other mens bateaus (Emancipation Proclamation Civil Rights in the United States). The Emancipation Proclamation proved superior, Lee capitulated his army at Appomattox Court near Lynchburg, Virginia.
For years slavery was an issue but when the Emancipation Proclamation was issued some issues “resolved.” When this freedom statement was being issued to the Union and the Confederacy many slaves gained freedom and were allowed to fight. The Emancipation Proclamation impacted the war greatly due to the freeing of many slaves. In the Emancipation Proclamation, Lincoln was trying to free slaves in the Confederate States.
The war began when the confederates bombarded Union Soldiers at Fort Sumter, South Carolina on April 12, 1861. The war ended in Spring 1865. Robert E. Less surrendered the last major confederate army to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse on April 9, 1865. The last battle was fought at Palmito Ranch, Texas on May 13, 1865. Historians debating the origins of the America Civil War focus on the reasons why seven Southern states declared their secession from the United Sates (the union), why they united to form the Confederate State of American (the ‘‘confederacy’’), and why the North refused to let them go.
President Lincoln stated that: “if I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it,..., and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would do it.”. This quote clearly shows that the freedom of slaves was not his concern and unnecessary if it did not help the Union; as the result, slavery still exists if there is no war. Free slave from bondage should be a Great Emancipator’s primary goal and he will do his best to achieve it no matter what, but president Lincoln’s thought differed from that because all he cares was the Union. Although he had many times admitting himself an anti-slavery but his words and thoughts obviously prove that he is
A common controversy in American history is the fact that Abraham Lincoln freed the slaves. Many claim that he freed them with the Emancipation Proclamation but it’s more complex than that. There were many events that helped free slaves and the Emancipation was only a small portion of America’s journey to freedom and “equality”. In reality, Lincoln helped the process of freeing the slaves but, he did not do it himself. Lincoln was not an abolitionist.
On September 2nd, 1862, Abraham Lincoln famously signed the Emancipation Proclamation. After that, there’s been much debate on whether Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation truly played a role in freeing the slaves with many arguments opposing or favoring this issue. In Vincent Harding’s essay, The Blood-red Ironies of God, Harding argues in his thesis that Lincoln did not help to emancipate the slaves but that rather the slaves “self-emancipated” themselves through the war. On the opposition, Allen C Guelzo ’s essay, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America, argues in favor of the Emancipation Proclamation and Guelzo acknowledges Lincoln for the abolishment of slavery through the Emancipation Proclamation.