I agree with the article because the author uses three different types of logos: logic, proof, and statistics.
Marianna Pogosyan uses logic a type of logo in her article ¨How Does Culture Affect Our Happiness? ¨. Pogosyan uses logic when she states, ¨[i]n some cultural contexts, the perspectives on happiness are more ambivalent¨ (p.2). Knowing that all cultures do not have the same idea about happiness, Marianna was able to depict the meaning of happiness across different cultures. Furthermore, she was able to use logic saying, ¨[c]ross-cultural differences also emerge in the effects that the pursuit of happiness has on well-being¨ (p.2). Everyone is not going to go through the same hurdles to reach happiness, by using logic Marrianna was able to come to this conclusion. Logic was used in Marianna article. As well as logic being used, proof another type of logos is also used.
…show more content…
Pogosyan, based her reading of Oishi and Gilbert, states, ¨[w]ithin the framework of psychological research on happiness, a happy person is characterized as someone who ´has pleasant feelings most of the time and feels satisfied with his/her life overall´¨ (p.1). Marianna Pogosyan used psychological research as proof to back up her claims about happiness. In the article she also summarizes, ¨[p]eople across cultures consider happiness as one of their most cherished personal goals. Even national campaigns and movements are being launched for building happier societies¨ (Pogosyan). The author proves that in diverse cultures happiness is still a big part of each culture and that cultures are searching for happiness by making movements and campaigns to do so. In ¨How Does Culture Affect Our Happiness? ¨ Pogosyan uses proof to support her article. While she uses proof in her article, she also uses
Happiness is a state of mind, and one doesn’t need physical material to be happy, which a majority of people view to be the primary source of happiness. Simply put, a person has the power to control whether they are happy or not. The author utilizes pathos, ethos, and logos to highlight the main ideas, demonstrating his mastery of the material. His usury of pathos, ethos, and logos illustrate to the readers that happiness is primarily a state of mind which isn’t automatically influenced by material things. Ethos is the ethical appeal an author makes to emphasize his authority as a knowledgeable and experienced veteran who corroborates any particular subject matter.
Logos, the use of logic and numerical evidence in an article, is a rhetorical device used when trying to persuade a reader to listen to and agree to an argument being delivered by giving the listener a logical reason as to agree with the author’s side of the argument. Matsios uses logos throughout his writing in the form of statistics, such as on page 185. The quote “In 2004 alone, the average real income of 99 percent of the U.S. population grew by little more than 1 percent, while the
Happiness is achieved through having purpose in life. The happiest people see their goals they set as reachable and a sense of purpose, while people who are cynical have no sense of purpose in their life or perceive themselves as unable to reach the goals they have set for themselves. While some cultures are better than others at encouraging people to follow their dreams, it is ultimately the responsibility of the individual to find and achieve their purpose in life. Published in December of 2009, a longitudinal study from UC Riverside on tested three hypotheses on the subject of happiness. The first hypothesis was ‘Becoming happier takes both a will and proper way’, the second and third hypotheses had to do with ‘maintained effects on
Logos means to use reason and or logic. The editorial talks about how one main cause of mental health is dying decades earlier than one should 've. But this is not because of suicide, which many think it is but it is because of poor physical health. The things that contribute of early dying is medication and personal ways of living.
Happiness is something humans have been pursuing for centuries. The quest for happiness is so cemented in the minds of human beings that it has been used as a method of control, and as a weapon against others. Humans are moths, ever drawn to the distant flame of joy. Over the past year I have learned much about this pursuit that has plagued humans for millennia. Pieces of literature like The Great Gatsby, Of Mice and Men and The Devil and Tom Walker all explore this pursuit in unique and diverse ways.
Happiness is an emotion, which makes it subjective, so it is difficult to have a definite meaning for the word. Is happiness just the absence of a negative feeling or is it the feeling of fulfillment and joy? Depending on the person, the answer varies and different activities make different types of people happy. Furthermore, each individual is willing to sacrifice certain materials to bring them joy. Nevertheless, in general, as a society, people sacrifice certain things, like money and time, in order to “make them happy.”
This example demonstrates that even though most people hated their job Joe loved it because he found happiness in it. Throughout the article Csikszentmihalyi also uses the techniques of ethos, pathos, and logos. The article is credible to us because his major is a psychologist. The piece also gets to us emotionally because we all strive to be happy. It is logic because he uses his finding to prove to us that what he is stating is true.
People miss the fact that happiness comes from within. In an attempt to find joy – we must also be cautious about over excessive desire to acquire material objects and wealth. There is a delicate balance that must be reached between the pursuit of happiness, satisfaction, and contentment. While there are many conditions that fulfill ones emotional wellbeing, happiness and how we acquired it, depends upon the
Logos appeals are similar to ethos in the fact that they are based on others work, yet there are forms of logos that are based more heavily on the statistic part of the appeal. In Engineering Happiness, Bruacells and Sarin write, “The origin of this definition of happiness can be attributed to Jeremy Betham, who is regarded as one of the fathers of modern economics” (3). This is a statistic, which makes this a logos topic, and it states the credibility of where it came from. It makes the reader believe that what they are reading is reliable and factual. In “On Mindfulness and Mental Health”, it says, “In an early Meta-analysis…Grossman, Niemann, Schmidt, and Walach (2004) found 64 empirical studies, but only 20 met their criteria of acceptable quality or relevance” (Martin 209).
From a global perspective, positive psychology centers on the positive aspects of human development. It is a fact that as a human grows and matures, the person faces the same challenges that every developing human encounters. However, although there are many who are at the point in their lives where their efforts and labors are recognized, the recognition often does not support the person (Seligman, 2009). The author suggests that every human should place him or her on the path to the “good life.” This does not necessarily mean wealth or intangible assets but rather inner happiness and peace (p. 45).
Not many achieve happiness in their lifetime. Either they do not live long enough to witness it or they are not prepared for what their happiness is. Happiness is very subjective. Each person’s version of happiness is different. This version of happiness is universal.
A collection of philosophical, religious, psychological and biological approaches had attempted to define happiness and analyze its connections. Researchers have found that about 50% of people happiness depends on our genes, based on studies of identical twins, whose happiness was 50% correlated even when growing up in different houses. About 10% to 15% is a result of various measurable life circumstances variables, such as socioeconomic status, marital status, health, income, and others. The remaining 40% is a combination of intentional factors and the results of actions that individuals deliberately engage in to become happier. Studies have also found that most of us are born with a fixed “set point” of happiness that we fall in throughout our lives.
At the end of everyone’s lives, the goal appears to be about attaining happiness. Describing how to obtain happiness has been an issue that was debated in the past but is still talked about now . In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle expands on his view of happiness and he focuses particularly on how reason helps recognize and pursue what will lead to happiness and the good life. I feel that Aristotle’s philosophies on happiness are important works within the field of philosophy and he considered one of the………of it . In this paper, I will explore Aristotle’s beliefs regarding happiness then compare and contrast them to those of Martin Seligman.
The definition of happiness incorporates different aspects of religion, science, and philosophy. To me, being happy means that someone has discovered who they truly are and what they believe in. A study on the Jewish
In other words, the good life means to me when life looks like a blessing than a burden. This essay aims to provide more than one answers about what makes people live a good life mean. Human beings, since their apparition is often misleading, what it is really mean a good life. We have been seen on the television or magazines that having a good life means being rich or famous when many of them, in reality, are miserable by a problem that wouldn’t affect ordinary people. Personally, I believe that there are many factors that should be considered when it comes to a good life.