Fur Trade: Comparison Of The Relations Between France And Osage

In 1701, Miskousath of the Mesquakie tribe pledged their loyalty to New France alongside other Western Great Lakes Tribes. Miskousath also encouraged the French to increase their presence in the area to discourage warfare. In that same year the Fox asked the French to stop trading arms and ammunition with the Sioux, to which the French gave no definite answer, promising to ask for consul from Louis XIV. The Mesquakie soon realized that the French had no intention of ending trade with the Sioux causing the Mesquakie to grow more hostile towards the French as they began intercepting French merchants. The Mesquakie seized the goods from the traders or forced them to pay such high tributes that merchants did not want to cross their land to get

Chief Osceola was a person who loved his tribe. He wanted them to have many rights. When Andrew Jackson invaded Florida, he was willing to fight for his tribe’s place in the state. Osceola objected the U.S.’s offer to buy the Seminole lands in Florida. But when the U.S. gave them the option to adopt the white ways, that did it without hesitation.

Fur trading in North America had occurred for hundreds of years, even before Europeans arrived to the New World. Native Americans and Aboriginal people in Canada from the different regions also traded amongst themselves, and many Native American tribes traded fur as their main source of income. Once Europeans arrived in the New World, they started to take part in trading fur, and the trading extended to Europe. French explorer Jacques Cartier had three voyages to the Gulf of St. Lawrence, where he traded fur with the First Nations people. His fur trading was used as trimming and adornments.

In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,

This article’s title is “Inseparable Companions” and Irreconcilable Enemies: The Hurons and Odawas of French Detroit, 1701-38 and its author is Andrew Sturtevant. The thesis in this article is the sentence, “The Hurons ' and Odawas ' simmering hostility and eventual conflict demonstrate that native groups survived the Iroquois onslaught and that their interaction profoundly shaped the region”. In this article, Sturtevant is arguing that the Huron and Odawa are distinct nations with different culture and that because of the differences they had many disagreements, not simply because of the colonialism by the French. Sturtevant uses direct quotes from primary sources to show that the distinct nations fought because of their own differences,

Introduction In the 1500s were there were only 13 colonies, they traded many items that soon became the center of there region, but, trading these days is isn’t as important as it was those days. The most important things is getting resources from other countries. If we can go back at that time when trading was important, there would be a lot of merchants in the ports trading many things. There were many farmers in the southern colonies that grow many things.

The U.S. Army was on the verge of invading them. To prevent this from happening, the Choctaw went on a long journey across the

The Age of Discovery was a period of time in which a profuse amount of Europeans as well as non-Europeans enlisted in extensive amounts of expeditions in search of trades routes, new lands, and riches. Within this period of time it was not uncommon for two or more groups, colonies, or kingdoms to make contact with one another, positively or negatively. Two groups in particular had interactions with each other that was ultimately disastrous for one of them. The Dutch and the Pequot’s relations together are some-what undefined in the sense that their first encounter with each other is not clear for complete accuracy. This essay explains a portion of the encounters between the Dutch and the Pequot in relation to the Age of Discovery.

During the late 1400s and the early 1500s, European expeditioners began to explore the New World. Native Americans, who were living in America originally, were much different than the Europeans arriving at the New World; they had a different culture, diet, and religion. Eventually, both the Native Americans and the European colonists exchanged different aspects of their life. For example, Native Americans gave the Europeans corn, and the Europeans in return gave them modern weapons, such as various types of guns. This type of trade was called “the Columbian Exchange.”

The Europeans came mostly in peace; however, the Native Americans saw the newcomers as a threat to their livelihood. Amoroleck, an Indian captured by the Europeans after a clash between the two, explained that the Native Americans attacked the settlers because they believed the settlers “were a people come from under the world, to take their world from them.” (Merrell 45) With early conflicts, neither party was coming out victorious with their losses out numbering their winnings between the Indians and Europeans. Eventually, the Native Americans would accept the Europeans and even live jointly, aiding one another whether it was determining the best hunting grounds, planting the right crops in the right area, or incorporating lifestyles by helping round up escaped slaves. The two parties learned to make the most out and how to benefit from each other.

The relationship between the Indians and Americans had improved, but over

Take Back Our land: Tecumseh Speech to the Osages “We must be united” was the plea from Tecumseh to the Osage tribe. In 1811, Tecumseh, known as the “Greatest Indian”, gave a speech pleading with the Osage tribe that they should unite together to fight against the white man (Tecumseh, 231). He goes on to tell how they had given the white man everything they needed to recover health when they entered their land but in return the white man had become the enemy. The speech to the Osages by Tecumseh illustrates the dangers of the white men to the Indian tribes, and why the tribes should unite together against the white man.

The fur trade helped the First Nations, to discover new things to make improved items, like we have now, such as technology. The coureur de bois helped the First nations in a unpradictable way. They traded European items, on there way through the forest, but they did something else. Some of the Coureur De Bois had relastionships with the Native woman. Yes, it may seem different, but it is true.

The French were more attentive of controlling trade routes, having fur being the driving force. So the French came to America mainly for the fur trade, and gained a mutual relationship with Native Americans. The Natives did most of tracking,

This source has significant value to historians but, like any other source, has its limitations. Andrew Jackson’s motivation to remove the Cherokee from their homeland originated from an avid persona to benefit the Americans. The speech analyzes Jackson’s motivation, and specific plans to remove the Cherokee. In consideration of the speech being written in 1830, the audience can learn how Jackson was rather harsh towards the natives in order to benefit himself and others. This is evident with Andrew Jackson’s actions and his presumptions of the Natives.