The Hound of the Baskervilles, a thrilling story about two detectives, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, as they solve the mystery of a hungry hound who looks for his next victim in Victorian England. This exciting novel was created by the godfather of mystery; Sir Conan Doyle. There are many interpretations of this mysterious novel, such as the movie by David Atwood of the Twenty-first Century (2002 BBC). But his artistic ideas bring many differences to the original story. The differences that the legendary original novel and the unique dramatic movie emit are plot structure the story tells, the characters that are involved, and the scenes that were included or excluded from. To start with, a difference that the novel and the movie have is that The …show more content…
This is why he changed the plot. Another example of this detail is that in the start of the movie, Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson are inspecting Sir Charles dead body. This completely changes the plot of the original story because Sherlock never gets to see Sir Charles dead body in the novel. To Atwood, this serves as a very captivating introduction to make the audience already want to know what happened to Sir Charles. Additionally, The Hound of the Baskerville book plot structure is also completely different from the movie. Unlike the movie’s actrativeness to the audience, like Atwood’s use of foreshadowing his plot, Doyle keeps everything straightforward and mysterious. This is why Doyle’s plot is different, because he want you to keep waiting for all of the mysteriousness of the book to finally be resolved and everything to make sense, which is what everyone wants. The book starts with Sherlock and Watson examining Dr. Mortimer’s walking stick. They discuss about Mortimer’s came, which in the book is stated as, “a stick as the old-fashioned family practitioner used
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
Yet the distinct differences between them also affect the plots to an extent to which the suspense in the movie is less compared to the novel. Although the differences greatly alter the two, it makes each of them unique and exclusive from each other. Despite these differences, there is one theme that links both the novel and the movie together: that people with different personalities, interests, and appearances are also the same to each other. The book shows more examples of this theme than the movie, making the novel more understanding to other individuals than the film itself. Because of this, we would recommend the book and film to those who experience a likeliness to the conflicts in each storyline, such as a fight between two different social
It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
Another difference is that in the movie they go into town, but in the book it 's never mentioned. Something else that was different was that in the book the mood was happy most of the time, while in the movie the mood was sad. A difference between the book and the movie is that in the book momma was going to burn Byron, but in the movie she does not burn him. A big difference is that in the
Daniel Aguirre Ms. Tobias English III GT - 6th 12 January 2017 After analyzing both the movie and the novel, I have discovered similarities and differences. Ill try to compare and contrast the two since the movie does not depict the story exactly as how the novel does. Similarities There were still some similarities in the film that tied back to the book. One of the main ones is when Nick walks to Gatsby’s backyard and finds him standing at the edge of his dock reaching out to what was a green light.
The movie has a different story structure. Unlike the book the movie has some flashbacks. Some differences are that she walks in oh the man in the beginning. The tells his wife in the movie that he is having an affair with another woman. The story clerk does not offer the woman cheesecake in the book.
To Kill A Mockingbird: Read it, Don’t Watch it. Have you ever watched the movie adaptation of a book, only to find that the book is far superior to it’s movie counterpart? Oftentimes when a book is adapted into a movie, there are some differences between the two. Sometimes the differences are subtle, but other times the differences are dramatic and can affect the development of the story. An example of this is the movie adaptation of the novel To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
1940 in America brought us Bugs Bunny in “A Wild Hare,” president Franklin Delano Roosevelt for a third term, the discovery of Stone Age paintings, and And Then There Were None. Over the Atlantic in Victorian England circa 1902, Lord Salisbury retired from being Prime Minister, King Edward VII and Queen Alexandria were coronated, the Olympic Games were held, and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle published The Hound of the Baskervilles. And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie and The Hound of the Baskervilles by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle are two top examples of mystery thrillers.
The last distinction I found was the age of Cindy Lu. In the book, the say that Cindy Lu was no more than two. But in the movie, she looks older than two. Cindy Lu has a bigger role in the movie than the book. I found many differences in the book and movie.
There are many simularities and differences in the book and movie " The
In the end I found the film to be easier to understand vs the book as it was an easier and more straight forward plot line whereas in the book it seemed to jump around leading to constant flipping between stories and pages to get a better
Although there are many differences between the two, there are also many similarities. Like how in both the movie and the novel she outsmarts the
Suspicion can be fascinating but haunting. Since Victorian times, the suspicious death case of Sir Charles Baskerville in The Hound of the Baskerville has intrigued/compelled vast amounts of readers. However, recent audiences are more compelled to stories with a modern twist of horror and gruesomeness. Because of less main characters, a fast-paced plot, and the differing point of view of Atwood’s The Hound of the Baskervilles film adaptation, the film has a frightening, intriguing mood with a new perspective compared to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s original novel.
After reading The Hound of the Baskervilles novel by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, we watched the screenplay by Ernest Pascal. The screenplay was much different than the actual book because Pascal added and deleted many scenes from The Hound of the Baskervilles . Usually, screenplay companies, like Pascal’s do this to make the screenplay more exciting or give it a more dramatic flare. There were numerous scenes that were deleted or completely left out of the screenplay that was in the novel. For starters, in “The Hound of the Baskervilles,” the Pascal completely left out Laura Lyons, the poor, needy daughter of Mr. Frankland.
The 1902 novel by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, named The Hound of the Baskervilles, is a thrilling entry in the Sherlockiverse, containing wit, humor, drama, affection, and, what would normally be necessary for a novel in this genre: mysteries. From the whereabouts of Seldon, to the matter of Laura Lyons, to the mystery for which the novel is named, of course regarding the matter of The Hound of the Baskervilles. The 2002 film by the same name, directed by David Attwood, was a justly screen adaptation of the novel, which was able to properly retain the original story without corrupting any of the structural elements of the novel. The film does indeed retain, and in some cases improve upon the various elements of the original tale, including the