How Did George Wallace Influence The Civil Rights Movement

Maggie L. Walker, an African American woman who lived in the 1800 hundreds, she was a woman that would fight for anything that she believed in. Walker was an activist who brought social change to other African American slaves. Maggie Walker was the first female president ever to own her own bank, she worked to help run down charities, and she was an Activist. Maggie Lena Draper also known as Maggie Lena Walker was born on July 15, 1864 in Richmond virginia. Her parents names were Elizabeth Draper, who was the former slave and cook for Elizabeth Van Lew.

In his article George Wallace Campbell mentions small details about Governor Wallace early life; origin, education, and political status. He also describes Governor Wallace actions of attacking civil rights activists and federal efforts due to his opposition to integration. In the early 1960s Campbell states the reputation Governor Wallace gained, as well as his refusal to support black enrollment in public schools. Campbell describes the impact Governor Wallace had on the white community and his support of an anti-African America stance. Campbell article is a helpful source because it helps me understand the motives behind Governor Wallace to oppose integration and understand Governor Wallace as a whole to an extent.

Maggie Riechers, a writer who explores humanity, states that Wallace’s “opposition to the civil rights acts passed by Congress” won him the support of ten million people when he ran for president (Riechers). Wallace’s refusal of these federal orders granted the white supremacy powers even more power because they could openly engage in anti-desegregation acts without violating any laws. This was, in a way, like wood thrown in a dying fire, which caused a larger and more deadly fire that would swallow and destroy the livelihoods of the black people. In addition, Wallace himself stated that the government “fawn for political reasons over school integration” but then comments that there is hypocrisy because they “build barricades to stop residential integration” (Wallace). Yet what Wallace hasn’t considered is that race should not be considered as subject of matter to initiate segregation upon.

The causes of the American Civil Rights movement follow a tortuous, diverging path; the work of a plethora of individuals and institutions culminating to accomplish a task unprecedented in American History. One such contribution may be traced well before the initial start of the Civil Rights Movement to the birth of one significant site within it – Tuskegee, Alabama. Tuskegee was founded as one of many farming communities within Alabama; whites found a home under its hot sun and upon its fertile ground. These luxuries were complimented handsomely by the de facto laws of the land – laws that allowed whites to own plantations whose prosperity lay on the backs of suffering African Americans. As Booker T. Washington’s influence rose within Tuskegee,

They protested to obtain equal rights and to end legal segregation and police brutality. Still racial division and inequality between black and white are very existed in American. I sometimes experience discrimination against my skin color and my belief. people first judge me before even they talk to me.

The 15th Amendment (Amendment XV), which gave African-American men the right to vote, was inserted into the U.S. Constitution on March 30, 1870. Passed by Congress the year before, the amendment says, “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” Although the amendment was passed in the late 1870s, many racist practices were used to oppose African-Americans from voting, especially in the Southern States like Georgia and Alabama. After many years of racism, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 aimed to overthrow legal barricades at the state and local levels that deny African-Americans their right to vote. In the

George Wallace wanted to run for presidency even though he was a liberal judge he used pro-segregation as a platform to gain the southern vote. They both had similarities and differences in Kairos, Ethos, Logos and Pathos. Dr. King and George Wallace had great timeliness for giving their speech, Kairos is the use of timeliness “ the right place and the right time.” (schoology.com) Both men used this point in time to give their speech because it was the beginning of the civil rights movement which benefited both men for different reasons. Martin Luther King Jr.’s use of Kairos benefitted him because when he gave his speech on August 28, 1963 it was the peak of the civil rights movement.

After the parents found out their kids were in jail they wanted to help with the protest. After 3 weeks in jail a singer and some northern people helped with the bail money. When the kids were bailed out they went back to their normal lives and then shortly after the civil rights act of 1964 came. After the children's march all the 250,000 kids that participated it are very successful now.

He believed that the best way to help African-Americans was by educating them. He became a teacher and headed and developed Tuskegee Institute. These men had very different childhoods, but as adults they both strove for the betterment

James Morris Lawson has been called one of the greatest nonviolent direct-action teachers to have ever lived. Martin Luther King, Jr, a Civil Rights icon, even believed that Lawson was something out of the ordinary. James Lawson worked and sculpted himself into what some would say, a monumental man, for his nonviolent tactics and forms of direct action during the Civil Rights movement. His views on racial equality through nonviolent means were foundational to the later Civil Rights leaders of the 1960’s. His commitment to political activism and equality developed at a young age, has not diminished in over seventy years.

Dr. Martin Luther King, a prominent figure in the Civil Rights movement, was a man of integrity. King advocated that nonviolent civil disobedience was the way to achieve racial justice in the fight for desegregation. He, along with the members of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, would hold many demonstrations and marches, as well as nonviolent, public disobedience of unjust laws, throughout his desegregation journey. Each time they would form to stand for their rights, King knew that there would be consequences. They ranged from public backlash to the harshest punishment of jail time.

His aim was for blacks to be completely separated from the other races so that they could develop their own homeland. His ideas proved to be controversial. Although his leadership was helpful in terms of spreading black nationalism, his ideas of “complete segregation’ wasn’t prefered by many. Why did civil rights

Not only did he have to deal with racism and segregation, he also dealt with a devastating bombing of his house on Christmas day in 1956. God blessed him because he was not near the house the time of the bombing. After leading an integration on all white public schools he was forced to endure being beaten with whips and chain. “No matter how many times they beat us up, segregation has still got to go”(1) is a quote from Fred Shuttlesworth that proves his courage and passion for equality. The question that I have been asking is how and why did he decide to lead in the Civil Rights Movement?

If even one person in the crowd fought back, then the march would have been labeled as violent and would not have been effective. Normal citizens who had nothing to do with this event saw an injustice and decided to support the civil rights movement. Rosa Parks decided to sit down on a bus and when she was asked to move she politely said no. This peaceful protest sparked the bus boycott, which positively impacted society. The empathy that the majority of people felt from these events lead to a change.

This was an influence to many countries and their black population. The most important thing that he did was to show the world that he and all the black people in the world where exactly the same as the white or ruling population in those years, and because of him the black people have the same exact rights as a average white