Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Dbq Essay

Indian Removal policy The Indian removal act is the act called for the government to negotiate treaties that would make the Native Americans to relocate west. Andrew Jackson had supported a law of moving all the Native Americans to the West of the Mississippi. Andrew Jackson thought that the government had the right to regulate where Native Americans Were allowed to live. To solve this problem Andrew Jackson asked the Congress to make a Law that would make Native Americans either move west or to submit to state laws.(Jackson's Removal Policy) Andrew Jackson grew up really hating the Indians and grew up having the skull of Indians.

The main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 is to have a process where the President could grant land on the west of the Mississippi River to the Indian Tribes that agreed to give up their homelands. One of the main points of the Indian Removal Act was for the President of the United States to divide the land, where the Indian Tribes will reside, into districts and let them be distinguished from others. Another main point of the Indian Removal Act is where the President of the United States has the right to exchange any or all of the districts where the Indian Tribes reside at. The last main point of the Indian Removal Act is where the President of the United States promises the Indian Tribes a country for a country. I think the Indian

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not justified, not everyone agreed and signed the treaty, of the Native Americans who did decided to move, many ended up dying, and in wars later on they sided with the Americans and fought with them. First of all, not everyone agreed and signed the treaty. The Cherokee and many other Native Americans were treated unfairly. They were also often cheated out of deals.

In the article it states that 10% of the cherokee Indians only moved to the new Indian territory. This means that the cherokee doesn’t wanna move due to their past problems, the cherokee possibly doesn’t want to move due to the fact that their land was carved into something they love, the cherokee may not want to move. Also, the supreme court even says “...Indian Territory shows how little support the treaty has.” , this obviously means that the Cherokee doesn’t want to move at all. More the reason why they shouldn’t move.

(University of Richmond,1) It is rather a source of joy that our country affords scope where our young population may range unconstrained in body or in mind,developing the power and faculties of man in their highest perfection-stated President Andrew Jackson at his second State of The Union Address. He is prophesying about the promise and potential that the Indian Removal Act holds. Passed on May 28,1830,The Indian Removal Act allowed the US government to exchange unsettled lands west of the Mississippi River for Indian lands within the boundaries of southern states like Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi. This was necessary because the jurisdiction was conflicting between the state government and the Indians.

“Then later you tried to divide our land up and give us little pieces, you tried to make us have last names and marriage certificates, like we were white people,” (Nerburn 272). Undoubtedly, the U.S. was trying to change the way the Natives lived and

Jd The final reason the Indian Removal Act was justified is that the Cherokee were given a great deal. Kl They were given options to stay, and if the Indians don’t like it, they can leave.

By 1840 90% of white males could vote. The Jacksonian administration passed the Indian Removal Act set in 1838. This act removed all the Native Americans from their homeland east of the Mississippi River. Commanding they settle within a confined area of land west of the Mississippi River and were to never return. Andrew Jackson

I, Michelle Benitez representative of Everett’s Law Firm, am here on the behalf of my wrongly accused client, President Andrew Jackson. In 1838, our Cherokee brothers and sisters were tore away from their native land; were forced to walk thousands of miles to an Indian Reservation Land. Our nation was inflicted a difficult decision; my client, Mr. Jackson, responded with the Indian Removal Act. From these course of actions, President Jackson was now recently accused of murder for all our deceased Cherokee brothers and sisters. Presidents prior to Mr. Jackson, my client, were imposed this burdensome decision of the Indian’s Removal.

Our homeland taken away Betrayed so easily at the thought of gold By those we thought would never sway The Indian Removal Act became a well-known name Relocating us west from our Cherokee homeland However, they weren’t all the same Some supported, while others pitied

This was therefore against the constitution and basis of democracy, meaning that Andrew Jackson, who established the act, went against democratic principles. After making them sign treaties promising that their land would not be taken away from them, Jackson’s men took away their land. This went against governing principles, to disregard a treaty is a sign of corruption and injustice. There is no place for injustice in a democratic government otherwise it starts resembling to a dictatorship or a monarchy. Furthermore, the Native Americans are American citizens in modern times and even if not considered back then it was a violation of the people's rights, the Native Americans did not choose to leave but we forcefully pushed out of their land.

The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.

This shows that United States believes that they are the supreme ruler, and they can do whatever they want to do without the consent of others. With no emotions from the United States, they decided to force the relocation of the Cherokee with armed

The Indian tribes were there for over a century when the Americans had just arrived not too long ago at the time. A person can obviously understand that the Indians had more of a right to kick the Americans out than vice versa. At least the Americans had offered the Indians something in return for their land. A large sum of money and a big land area bigger than Georgia was offered in exchange for the Indians to move out of the state. The proposal was quite the head scratcher, but why would the Indians risk moving to a new land they don’t have much knowledge about and risk the health of their people in the move?

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.