Indifference, By Martin Niemoller And The Kitty Genovese Murder

He learned shortly after escaping the camps that not only had the rest of the world known of these camps, but also that for a long time they did nothing to help. In this instance, indifference of the world was the most dangerous of all evils because “indifference elicits no response” and therefore “is always the friend of the enemy” (Wiesel 3) according to Eliezer’s speech Perils of Indifference. One’s struggles often affect how they see others, and in experiencing such terrors due to indifference it makes perfect sense to want to advocate for others experiencing hardships. Often, these worldviews are directly related to instinctive reactions to traumatic

In Elie Wiesel’s Nobel peace prize acceptance speech, he exemplifies how seeing people in need and not helping them is a crime against humanity and as someone ignoress them more and more people become bitter and truly evil. This is shown in his acceptance speech when Elie states “The world did know and remain silent. And that is why I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

In the middle of Wiesel's plea to the government Logos began to appear in his words and effectively strengthened his tone and the assertiveness in his voice. “Indifference elicits no response. Indifference is not a response. Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor -- never his victim, whose pain is magnified when he or she feels forgotten.

Niemoller has been a part of both sides of indifference. For example, he says that he experienced indifference when, “Niemoller admitted he did not take a stand against the Nazi's treatment of the Jews.” This means that even though Niemoller knew what was happening around him, he did not speak up, possibly the result of fear or not wanting to stand out. Niemoller did not assist the people enduring indifference and this may have ended up being karma against him. “Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.”

He states “Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor -- never his victim…” (Wiesel, 1999). For example, because of indifference the imprisonment went on for far longer than it would have if officials had intervened to stop the happenings at concentration camps. One time he mentioned how nice it would have been if the Allies had bombed the railways leading to the camps.

“Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor - never his victim”(Perils of Indifference) said Elie Wiesel, survivor of the Holocaust in his Perils of Indifference speech. In his speech he explains a little about his experience throughout the holocaust, but mainly about why he is so against indifference. While in his Nobel Peace Prize winning book, Night, he describes in depth about his journey through concentration camps and what he witnessed along the way. Indifference is a big topic of his, and it is now a matter of what illustrates the topic better, Night or Perils of Indifference.

“The Perils of Indifference” is a speech written and given by Elie Wiesel in April 1999. It’s a relatively brief speech that illustrates the after effects of being a prisoner of the Holocaust. Wiesel was there. He lived through it. The feelings that he shares in this speech are not only valid, but rather eye opening as well.

However, disregarding the predicament in Syria is only prolonging the poor education and without any action against those participating in violence, they are only going to do worse until they are stopped. In addition, indifference is conveyed in the speech “The Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel. Elie Wiesel is a Holocaust survivor who was taken to a Nazi concentration camp at a young age for extraneous manual labor without proper nutrition. He took what he learned from his experiences and the outside knowledge he has on the subject now to speak on the Holocaust as a whole. In this speech, he states, “Indifference is not a beginning; it is an end.

Indifference need to be gain awareness and be stopped. He develops his claim by narrating the dangers of indifference, and how it affected his life then, describes how wrongful it is to be treated in such a way. Finally Wiesel illustrates examples of how indifference affected the world. Wiesel’s purpose is to inform us about the dangers of indifference in order to bring change about it. He establishes a straightforward tone for the president, ambassadors, politicians, and congressmen.

The dangers of apathy were stressed by Wiesel in a 1999 address he gave at the White House titled The Perils of Indifference. According to the speech, "to keep quiet when injustices happen is to condone injustice and to undercut human rights everywhere. " This statement shows that not stopping racial discrimination when you see it; means that you support it. With his Holocaust experience and the approaching future, Elie Wiesel expresses the need to stop indifference to provide future generations with renewed desire and promise.

In the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of

Rebecca Rickord Mrs. Graver English 1112 12 April 2023 The Perils of Indifference Elie Wiesel gave his influential speech “The Perils of Indifference” eat the White House in 1999. Wiesel was a survivor of the Holocaust; and due to this experience, he spent his life advocating for human rights and sharing what he endured as a prisoner in concentration camps.

Jonathan Dixon Mrs. Turner English II Honors 18/4/23 Title: Subtitle “Indifference reduces the other to an abstraction” (Wiesel). The Holocaust was a dark period in time, categorized by the discriminate genocide of many marginalized groups, most notably Jewish people. During this time, many chose to ignore the persecution of innocent people, deciding to instead turn a blind eye to the injustice happening with their knowledge. In “The Perils of Indifference”, Elie Wiesel uses pathos, rhetorical questions, and loaded words to emphasize the dangers of being blind to the suffering of others, using his own experience as a catalyst to do so.

Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel, in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” expresses the need to prevent indifference to renew hope to future millenniums. He supports his claim by emotionally describing his past life, then he interprets the word indifference and questions his audience about it, then he uses examples of many victims life as prisoners, and finally, he addresses the necessity of starting the new century without the world being apathy. Wiesel’s purpose is to persuade his audience to be less indifferent to innocent people, including recent victims of injustice in order to start the new millennium without any failures. He creates a hopeful tone for an audience that, he believes wants to make the world better.