Jackson's Bank Veto Analysis

Andrew Jackson was very against the growth of the new upcoming banking system in the

Watson’s book further describes that Andrew Jackson and Henry Clay mainly had political differences, morals, and characteristics. Although Andrew Jackson- like Henry Clay- was a supporter of increased democracy and economic development, he and his supporters still tended to believe that the growing wealth and power of

Faith Picotte History 310 (T-Th) Homework Ch. 8 1.Turner’s frontier thesis is deceptively draws and allure your inquisitive imagination into a grand scale visionary picture of settlements of specific regions, and the social societal processes. Americans realized the frontier formed and promoted a composite nationalist American society. The English dominated the coastal region. , later continental immigrants flowed towards the free lands of the frontier.

(Document G) This quote is important because it shows that Jackson was warned about the poor decision to put Swartwout in charge of the taxes. However, this monumental theft would not have happened if Jackson did not previously veto the National Bank. In Jackson's Veto message to Congress he states, “It is to be regretted that the rich and the powerful would bend the acts of the government to their selfish purposes.” (Document D)

Economic Developments During the early 1800s, economic developments helped the America grow into a prosperous country. As nationalism was highly prominent during this era, many policies were experimented to try to help America grow with more power. Often times, since America’s population was so diverse, these policies often stemmed differing opinions from different citizens. However, such policies that were generally successful, such as the American System, would amalgamate many parts of the country, as well as producing a self-sustaining and unified nation.

He strongly opposed the National Bank. He believed that the National Bank only contributed to the wealthy people of the US, not the common people. Jackson also stingily believed in the fact that state banks are more helpful than the National Bank. By stopping the bank, he hoped to make the government smaller. This decision made the government less involved.

In Jackson's Bank Veto Message, he states that his principal reason for his veto was that he wanted to prevent the existence of monopolies. This is a fine reasoning that also goes along with is political views. The objection to this is that he was warned on how it would be detrimental to the United States economy but still went through with it. It cannot be overlooked that he had to fire two different secretaries until he finally appointed a close friend to agree with him. This is an obvious abuse of power, seeing as he fired two people simply for telling him that his idea would not work.

Accessed October 12, 2015. http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/disp_textbook.cfm? smtID=3&psid=3923. “President Jackson 's Veto Message Regarding the Bank of the United States; July 10, 1832.” Yale Law School Lillian Goldman Law Library The Avalon Project.

1. When did the “Aroostook War” occur & what was its cause? An explosive controversy of the early 1840s involved the Maine boundary dispute. The St. Lawrence River is icebound several months of the year, as the British, remembering the War of 1812, well knew.

Andrew Jackson was seen as a common man the voice of the people by some. By others he was King Andrew, trampling the constitution and instigating tyranny. Jackson’s presidency impacted democracy, through his use of the veto power, and his claim of Clay creating a “corrupt bargain”, which is not a turning point for a rise in democracy despite him giving white male suffrage. During Jackson’s use of executive power weakened voice of the people.

In document L it states "It sows... the seeds of jealousy and ill-will against the government of which its author is the official head." This means the bank was housed be both senete and house and Jackson didn't want

Vetoing is to allow or reject a decision or proposal made by a law-making body. The overall reason Jackson is known to be a tyrant is his abuse of power. The amount of vetoes he confirmed truly justifies the fact that he took advantage of his power. “The Second Bank of the United States was founded in 1816 and had a 20-year charter approved by congress that gave it the power to act exclusively as the federal government’s financial agent.” (Source 4)

From what I read and what he said, I thought it sounded like he didn’t want to shut down the United States Bank. And then in Document 5, Webster acted like Jackson should put an end to the bank by saying, “It manifestly seeks to inflame the poor against the rich, it wantonly attacks whole classes of the people, for the purposes of turning against them the prejudices and resentment of the other classes.”

In the presidential election of 1832, the existence of the national bank is a huge topic because the second bank of the United States would expire its charter at 1836. The president Andrew Jackson won the election and he accused the bank. The citizens supported Jackson’s policy toward the second bank of the United States that Jackson insisted to finish the bank. The biggest question is how the President Jackson persuaded the citizens. The major three reasons the bank should finished is that the huge power of the bank, foreign

With these issues arising, the public became more aware of the fact that the Bank held too much power that even its advocates were unable to deny (Schlesinger 75). Jackson gave a message to Congress in 1829 that implored the legislature to recognize the unconstitutionality of the present Bank and to set reform for the Bank into motion if Congress agreed that the Bank was necessary (Remini 61). Jackson’s presentation made the president’s position clear and put the declaration of the unconstitutionality of the bank into public records. Had Biddle honestly investigated these allegations against the Bank, people would be certain of the Bank’s good intentions instead of viewing the Bank as power-hungry and unjust. Because Biddle stubbornly refused this compromise of investigation, the public became weary of the Bank’s power which Jackson would use to veto the recharter of the Bank and still maintain public