Julius Caesar Assassination Essay

Caesar was an honorable man and was never proven to be a potentially poor leader. Rome loved him as he loved Rome. He even refused the crown when it was offered to him, to quote Casca mentioning it to Cassius and Brutus,”And he put it thrice, each time gentler than the other.” (I,ii, pg. 10). There is no substantial proof that Caesar would have been bad enough of a leader to justify a political assassination.

Caesar would strong enough to step up and make Rome more powerful.

He was elected consul several times, and was the undisputed ruler of rome He provided land pensions for his soldiers, restricted the debts of a huge percentage of Rome’s debtors, and modified the calendar to make it appear more like the one used today Caesar was stabbed 23 times by the Senators in Rome because they declared that he had too much power Octavius, Lepidus, and Antony created a triumvirate, but it failed because it created a war Octavius won against Antony in the war, changed his name to Caesar Augustus, adopted the title emperor, and started printing coins The Roman Republic was not intact, and the Senate became useless Rome was first a city, then a city state, and then a republic Hannibal did not win against the Romans, so they were able to acquire

Julius Caesar Back Round On JC Born roughly around July 12 or 13th 100 BC in Rome and died March 15th 44 BC Politically adept/ Popular Leader of the Roman Republic Transformed Roman Empire by expanding its geographical reach and establishing an imperial system. Caesar joined the military to escape having to divorce his first wife Cornelia who's father was a political rival of the current dictator Sulla. JC returned to Rome after friends eventually convinced Sulla to allow him to return and after Sulla's passing began Caesar's in depth dive into Roman politics and prosecuting. Even after all Caesar did for his country a year after he returned to Rome and was claimed as dictator then hailed as Father of his Country he was savagely assassinated.

Death of the Republic 91202 James Morrissey Power in a name Julius Caesar was popular among the citizens of Rome. Caesar had gained this popularity due to his successes in war for Rome and the laws he created for the wellbeing of Rome. The reason Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC was due to declaring himself dictator for life of Rome. This is because the term dictator was considered a toxic word in Roman politics as almost all previous dictators had been tyrants in Roman history. The senators who assassinated Caesar believed that they would be celebrated for killing Caesar .

There have been many rulers in the Roman Empire, but none like Julius Caesar. Through his short rule as dictator, he was able to improve the ways of Roman life, and help the empire as a whole. He made many reforms to alter what other rulers have done before, improving the harsh and cruel laws. He was passionate about what he did, never letting the Roman people down. Never again will Rome see another ruler as great as Julius Caesar.

Life in Rome during the time of Julius Caesar, who ruled from 49 BC to 44 BC, was marked by political upheaval, military expansion, and cultural changes. Caesar's reign was a pivotal time in Roman history, and the events of his life had a lasting impact on the Empire. Politically, the Roman Republic was in turmoil, with frequent power struggles and uprisings. Caesar's rise to power was met with opposition from the Senate, and his declaration of himself as dictator was seen as a threat to the traditional political system.

The people of the Roman Empire saw Julius Caesar as a profound leader. If it was fully up to the people, Julius Caesar would have quickly come to power because of all the success he brought. Expansion in the empire was also brought because of the alliances he was able to make with other generals and leaders.

What would you think about someone who killed about 2 million people during their lifetime? This same man also crowned himself as a dictator after gaining political control. After knowing this, would you still believe that this same man was able to save thousands from poverty and starvation? Probably not, but Julius Caesar—the same person who murdered over 2 million people and crowned himself as a dictator—was respected and crucial to the growth of Rome. Gaius Julius Caesar was a Roman general and politician during the Roman Republic.

The imperial system's dependence on powerful and secure leadership was harmed when the conspirators assassinated Caesar and replaced him with an unpopular emperor, setting in motion a chain of events that would ultimately contribute to the decline and collapse of the system. The emperor was the highest authority in the empire, and as such, his or her role and personality had a significant impact on the empire's stability and success. Weak or unimportant emperors frequently caused economic crises, huge barbarian invasions, and chaos. As a result, the Roman Empire's dependence on the emperor's status and character contributed to its decline and eventual collapse. This decline would not have happened if Caesar hadn't been killed.

Considering Caesar’s approval surrounded by the senate, it gave him a copious number of enemies because other politicians were jealous of the number of things that he had accomplished in the republic. He also gave former enemies, ones he had previously conquered, positions in government. Some of these positions included the senate. This was ultimately the biggest mistake during his reign due to the fact that, these people conducted the assassination plot for

Death, uncertainty, and fear all come to mind when thinking about the Roman Empire. When Julius Caesar made the fatal decision of turning the Roman Government into an empire, it hurt Rome forever. Bad leaders damaged Rome’s image while citizens of Rome lived in fear and panic. No one could control bad leaders and limit their power, giving them the freedom to do whatever they wanted. Although Caesar was very popular among common people, there would be many dictators that weren’t.

If Caesar would stay in Power, the Senate would get no say, and practically be part of the people. Whatever Caesar demands will have to happen, if not Caesar can banish you. An example of this is when Flavius and Marullus were stripped of their power for taking down decorations (I, iii, 285-287). Even though many good things came from Caesar, they were all named after him, this can also be an egotistical standpoint. Caesar loves to be flattered, which boosts his

He stabilized the empire, and thus destroyed the republic. His short reign ended what was left of the republic. People contemplate whether or not he was a good leader, and if he is the main reason for the fall. In reality, the fall of the republic was inevitable. Caesar just sped it up slightly.

He then became the dictator of the Roman Empire which carried on for the short span of a year before his unexpected death. However, he accomplished many duties and responsibilities by the young age of 31. The cause of Julius Caesar’s death was by assassination by his enemies. Caesar might have died but shortly after his death he became the scapegoat in the new Roman Empire. A clan of lower and bourgeois Romans huddled at Caesar’s funeral with the furious crowd ambushing and besieging the homes of Cassius and Brutus, the culprits who murdered Julius.