Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

The second way that Antony used logos was him reminding Rome of how much Caesar did to Rome. Antony knew about the many great things Caesar did for Rome such as, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill.”, “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept;”, “You all did see that on the Lupercal I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse.” (3.2, 85-95) https://myshakespeare.com/julius-caesar/act-3-scene-2-popup-note-index-item-brutish. Captives from the enemy Caesar brought to Rome, When the poor were sad Caesar would be sad with them, Caesar was asked to rule Rome three times and he refused each time, he never thought himself higher than the regular people. For him to bring captives to Rome, cry with the people of Rome, and to refuse the crown these were all the ways Caesar helped Rome, how he was not ambitious and how much he loved Rome.

First, Antony uses logos to appeal to the logic of the people of Rome to persuade them to join his side.

During the seminar, many different view points and perspectives were expressed. One of the ideas that were discussed was that Antony and Brutus used different rhetoric devices to express their feelings. Antony used many examples of pathos in both his funeral speech and his everyday life. He aims to establish emotional reactions from his intended audiences and sometimes over uses this device. Brutus on the other hand does the exact opposite.

Mark Antony's speech on the death of Julius Caesar is a great piece of sympathy that serves as a very important moment in William Shakespeare's play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. " Delivered with great power and manipulation, Antony's speech showcases his strengths in delivering speeches. This essay will analyze the key rhetorical devices used by Mark Antony, examining their strategic intent and their impact on the audience's perception and emotions. The first thing we will be talking about is ethos.

In William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony uses juxtaposition, irony, anecdotes, and rhetorical questions to appeal to the Plebians with ethos and pathos to convince them that Brutus and the conspirators are traitors. Mark Antony shares a speech with

In the Shakespeare play, “Julius Caesar” many types of rhetorical devices are used by numerous characters to persuade the audience. Marc Antony uses all these rhetorical devices to their fullest when talking to a crowd about the murder of Caesar and how these conspirators should be held accountable. The devices that Antony effortlessly crafts into his argument are irony, in the first half of his speech, and the props he uses, in the second half of his speech. Marc Antony uses verbal irony to indirectly led the crowd to new conclusions about the conspirators.

Marc Anthony's funeral speech in the tragedy of Julius Caesar uses good persuasion techniques. With his use of rhetorical appeals, Anthony is able to sway the crowd and turn them on the conspirators who murdered Caesar. One of his most effective rhetorical appeals that Anthony uses on the crowd is logos. Through his speech, he repeats the phrase "Brutus is an honorable man" multiple times, each time with a slightly different tone. At first, the logos he uses seems to be a way of praising Brutus, but as the speech goes on, it’s clear that Anthony is using the phrase ironically.

Meanwhile, Marc Antony was ready to verbally attack Brutus for killing Julius, and he was trying to ensure Brutus could not persuade anyone that he was innocent. In Shakespeare’s drama Julius Caesar, Brutus gives a more persuasive speech and stronger argument because of his strong use of rhetorical devices such as dialogue, repetition, and motive compared to Antony. The first persuasive rhetorical device used by both people is dialogue, or verbal communication between two or more people. After Antony speaks about Caesar’s will, the crowd responds by saying “read it Marc Antony.

Antony's skillful use of emotional appeal, rhetorical questions, and loaded language creates a powerful argument that sways the people of Rome to join him in avenging Caesar and his supporters for the heinous crimes committed against them by Brutus and his conspirators. Antony's skillful use of language is central to his success, as it allows him to manipulate public opinion and engender fervent support for his cause. This essay will examine how Antony uses these rhetorical devices to great effect, leading to the tragic end of Caesar's life and the further destabilization of Rome's political climate. In Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar, Antony's use of emotional appeal plays a key role in swaying the opinions of the Roman citizens against the

The ability to persuade and use rhetoric effectively is one of the most important themes in William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. Several characters, such as Cassius and Brutus, employ rhetorical strategies. Cassius uses persuasive language to convince Brutus to support his effort to assassinate Caesar. Brutus uses logos in his speech at Caesar's burial to demonstrate rhetoric. The plan thickens as the play progresses, and Brutus, as well as some of the conspirators, become enraged with Julius Caesar.

Brutus uses logos to appeal to the audience’s reason by explaining that Caesar’s murder was necessary, lest his ambition would grow and reduce the common folk to slaves. He conveys that sacrifice was necessary to preserve freedom in Rome, thus it was reasonable to sacrifice Caesar for the greater good. Brutus continues to exercise logos in the statement “There is tears for his (Caesar’s) love; joy for his fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his ambition” (JC 3.2). Brutus assigns consequences to Caesar’s various beneficial and detrimental attributes.

For instance, Antony proves Brutus wrong by providing examples of when Caesar showed he was not ambitious. Antony looks back on when “He hath brought many captives home to Rome, whose ransoms did the general coffers fill. Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept;” (3.2.88-91). Here, Antony uses logos by giving direct reasons to why Brutus’s accusations of Caesar being ambitious are wrong, further displaying Brutus and the conspirators’ wrongdoings.

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Antony uses the rhetorical appeal logos to persuade the Roman people to turn against the conspirators. At the beginning of Antony’s speech, he started off by giving examples of Caesar being a generous leader, so when the ‘poor cried’ out for help, Caesar cried along with them (91). Antony uses the rhetorical appeal logos when he said that Caesar ‘cried’ with the poor. He made an argument that Caesar caried about the Roman people and more deeply, since the conspirator said that they killed Caesar because he is ambitious, but Caesar caried about his countrymen which showed that the conspirators are not honorable.

William Shakespeare, in his tragedy Julius Caesar, uses the rhetorical devices of a rhetorical question, repetition of the word ambitious, and direct reference in Antony 's speech to instigate the plebeians and persuade them to rebel against the conspirators. Antony pulls on the pathos, ethos, and logos of the audience to get them to exile the conspirators. Shakespeare uses a rhetorical question in Antony’s speech to get the plebeians to notice the wrongdoings of the conspirators and excite them to rebel. Antony discusses the money that Caesar left to the countrymen, and with sarcasm he states, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” (3.2.99).