Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices

Which is when they are able to engage the audience or reader emotionally in order to persuade the audience. By using pathos he was able to make the audience feel proud for being Roman. He made it clear that choosing Caesar would take away the freedoms of being Roman. Using the anaphora and epistrophe put a strong emphasis on Brutus’ main

Compared to the Ethos that Brutus used, the people connected with Antony’s speech much more and were in turn more likely to remain by his side. Once Brutus thought he had the attention of the people, he used the literary device Logos to attempt and keep people by his side despite not realizing what little effect it really had on them. The way that Brutus utilized logos was by claiming, “I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I / slew him” (III.ii.1560-1561). Despite the obvious meaning that Brutus was afraid of the power Caesar would gain and what he would use it for the citizens decide they want Brutus to become the new leader and completely miss the point which shows that logos was not a good device to use in this situation. Once Brutus had already made the mistake of using logos, Antony delivered his speech with plenty of pathos, repetition, and a dramatic pause.

In Shakespeare's play The tragedy of Julius Caesar after Caesar was slain by the conspirators, at his funeral Brutus and Mark Anthony both gave a speech about Caesars' brutal death and how they public should react to it. Brutus, being the smart man he is was using a lot of logos in is speech to win the crows over and to justify what has happened. While on the other hand Mark Anthony was using a lot a pathos to get the crowd on his side to get them to read his will. Brutus's speech was packed full of logos which made him seem more credible. During his speech he said "Had you rather Caesar living and die all slaves?

He takes a very formal standpoint when giving his speech. Antony, on the other hand, opens his by saying, “Friends, Romans, and countrymen” (Anderson 834). By taking this approach, he uses pathos and gives off more emotion by calling them his friends first. The honorable man Brutus, gives a formal speech in an extremely serious manner. He has everything planned out and is rational within his speech.

Antony uses pathos better than Brutus in his speech and this shows because Antony says "See what a rent the envious Casca made" (act 3 scene 2) as he shows the commoners Caesar's cloak, that makes the people feel sorry for poor Caesar and it makes them feel angry and enraged toward the people who stabbed Caesar. He uses pathos by reading the will which says Caesar left his gardens to all the people of Rome this makes the people of Rome feel bad for ever believing Brutus who said Caesar was ambitious and if Caesar was ambitious he would not care if the people were crying or hurt. Antony also uses

To such a sudden flood of mutiny” (Shakespeare 3.2 208-209). Building on his credibility, Antony claims to be a friendly messenger when in reality he is acting as an instigator. This allows him to deliberately turn the crowd against Brutus in a careful way. As the crowds anger reaches his peak Antony states, “I come not, friends, to steal away your hearts: / I am no orator, as Brutus is” (Shakespeare 3.2 216-217). He acts humble while using sarcasm to further mock Brutus.

Within Antony’s speech to the Romans he uses anaphoric text to spike a whirl of rage towards Brutus. Repeatedly Antony states “Brutus is an honorable man” emphatically for the duration of his speech to contradict Brutus’s nobility ( March Antony, Lines 83,88,95 ). Before Antony begins his speech he is approached by the Romans with comments to not speak bad on Brutus’s name, which is why he utilized the anaphora to repeat that Brutus is an honorable man therefore allowing him to gain the Romans trust to speak. Antony does not say these lines truthfully but sarcastically to make the people of Rome feel furious against Brutus for taking Caesar to his mortal death.

Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.

In William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony uses rhetorical devices such as paralipsis, rhetorical questions, and verbal irony in his speech to the plebeians in order to plot them against the conspirators. During his speech to the plebians, Antony uses paralipsis in order to kindle curiosity and interest in the audience. Antony mentions to the plebians that he had Caesar’s will with him but tells them, “Have patience, gentle friends, I must not read it; It is not meet you know how much Caesar loved you” (3.2.152-153). By drawing attention to Caesar’s will, something Antony desperately wants to show the plebeians, but then dismissing the idea of reading it, Antony uses a type of verbal irony called paralipsis. Antony is aware that the contents

The appeals in Antony’s speech were persuasively better than the use of them in Brutus’s speech. Marc Antony uses all three appeals in his speech to make a very sturdy argument. An example of logos in his speech is when he states, “He hath brought many captives home to Rome Whose ransoms did the general coffers fill: Did this in Caesar seem ambitious?” This speech is Antony stating facts of Caesar’s work which proves that he is not ambitious and does not deserve to be killed. Antony also uses ethos and pathos when he says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me.”

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.

Antony uses pathos he communicates to the people in a way that Brutus did not. Since, Antony is not allowed to say anything bad at the funeral he discretely criticizes Brutus and Cassius because he feels that what they did was wrong. For example, when Antony makes a comment that is contrary to what he means, he says “But Brutus is an honourable man”. Antony uses a lot of pathos because he wants the citizens to feel the way he is feeling. For example, he says he wants to read them the letter but he does not want to make them weep because of how much Caesar loved them.

In this scene Caesar has been murdered by the conspirators including Brutus. Brutus is one of Caesar's good friends who is driven by honor; who thought Caesar’s ambition was going to be the end of Rome. Antony is a very loyal friend of Caesar’s who does not agree with the conspirators. Brutus and Antony are both smart well thought out characters. They desire to persuade the commoners to their side of the situation.

After bringing out Caesar 's Dead body. Describing what a honorable man his was. And showing them how brutal his killing was. In act three the people are angered and overwhelmed the people kill an innocent man simply because he had the same name as one of the conspirators cinna . the complete chaos ensures rhom may not look seem like a positive reaction to antony 's speech but it is in fact what he wants which is shown through soliloquy through the lack of almost no reaction to brutus logical and ineffective speech it is obvious that antony 's speech is more effective over the people of rome as speeches as a whole this shows that emotional appeal causes a much bigger reaction than logic and reason.

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar