Many times in life, people are accused of actions that were not theirs. They must go through a series of events to prove this action wrong and abhorrent. In the novel, Monster, written by Walter Dean Myers, Steve, a sixteen-year-old boy, young and confused, has been placed on trial accused of felony murder. As the jury looked into this case, they came to the conclusion Steve was not guilty. Many factors led to the conclusion of Steve being proven not guilty. There was a lack of evidence to convict Steve guilty. Others have shown Steve's lack of guilt through their actions. On the night of the robbery and murder, there was no proven statement Steve was at the convenience store. He was caught up with the wrong people at the wrong time. Firstly, Steve is found innocent in the story Monster due to lack of evidence. As Steve is on trial the jury comes to the conclusion they can’t find Steve guilty. The defendant, earnest and petrified, could only think about being proven innocent. As the defendants have more evidence than Steve of the murder and of being at the convenience store at this time, they can be proven guilty. “...there were 2 men in the store, 2 men involved in the robbery. And we have 2 men who …show more content…
As stated on multiple occasions in the story, the others convicted were proven to be at the convenience store the night the robbery took place. The only evidence provided would have to be the witnesses, who in retrospect were not reliable. “The State doesn't even suggest that he was in the store during the robbery.” “The state does contend that somewhere, sometime, Steve got together with someone and agreed to participate in this robbery.” These two quotes from the book are both to show how Steve could not be held to his whereabouts on the night of the murder. He was never 100 percent at the convenience store the night the cashier was
To start off, being in jail and court in this situation causes a lot of metal struggles. Steve knows he messed up and can lead to many years in jail, making him think deeply about his life. From Steve being through
This is proved when Mr. Sawicki testifies. In the novel Mr. Sawicki testifies stating, “‘He’s very much involved with depicting his neighborhood and environment in a positive manner.’” (Myers 235). Throughout the novel there weren't a lot of people that testified about Steve. In fact, there were probably only three people.
Just because they are guilty doesn't mean they can't be a Monster. In the book Monster by Walter Dean Myers, Steve Harmon, a 16 year old, is on trial for felony murder. Based on the evidence given, Steve Harmon is not guilty as shown through testimonies, journals and flashbacks. During Steve's trial, Lorelle Henry, the librarian, testifies and proves Steve Harmons innocence. She testified that King was in Nesbitts Drug Store
(Myers 226). Steve is a monster because he said that was the only thing they talked about. In reality they talked about kicking someone's butt. That is lying to the jury. Steve was in the store but he lied to the jury about it and that makes him a
Although you might wonder why I mentioned the money saying he might have participated, the main reason they committed the crime was for money. So why did Steve not get paid? I am writing this essay to prove that Steve correctly proved his innocence to the judge and juries. The first major evidence is that Lorelle Henry did not witness Steve in the store while she was there.
In the novel, Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, 16- year- old Steve Harmon is placed on trial for felony murder. Steve tries to prove his innocence to the jury and he is found not guilty. Therefore, he is acquitted of any crime. However, Steve’s contradicting thoughts make the reader question his innocence.
Then he started doubting himself and kinda blaming himself. This made Steve a monster because he was walking in the store the day the robbery happened knowing that it was that day and
Steve knew about the robbery and didn’t go tell anyone. This happens in a flashback of Steve listening to King talk about robbing the drugstore. The book said King said “Drugstores always keep some money… All we need is a lookout.
(Myers 235)This proves Steve is a good person because he still cares about if people die,nesbitt and him were not even close and he felt upset about what happened to him. He was disturbed that people would do that to an old man that worked his whole life just to get that drug store. It made him feel sick to his stomach and felt like humanity was falling. Furthermore,During this, Jerry and Steve were on the couch watching tv, Jerry said that they should be superheroes and help people. Steve said that would be cool because he could help people when they need help, when they are hurt, and when they are in danger.
Steve Harmons actions depicted his characteristics and we can, therefore, conclude that Steve Harmon is a liar as he lied under oath. Steve was also a guilt-ridden man ashamed of his actions. People who disagree may claim that Steve was undoubtedly innocent as Lorelle Henry, a witness, declared that there were only 2 people, proven to be James King and Bobo Evans, inside the store who eventually murdered Mr.Nesbitt. This may be a strong argument because it shows that Steve was not in the drugstore and could be really innocent. On the contrary, however, Steve’s job was just supposed to be a lookout and ensure that the drugstore was clear of cops or anyone inside.
His wording shows that he doesn’t know who he is and therefore believes he is a Monster as Ms. Petrocelli calls him. He accepts people’s judgments as his self-truth. Even though, he, himself, accepts the worst he still wants people to perceive him as a good person, especially his mom. Steve’s mom’s words cut deeper in him because his mom believes he didn’t do it while he knows he did. 5 days into the trial, his mother comes by and talks to him hoping to make him feel better, “I could still feel Mama’s pain.
The whole jury said he is not guilty. People also said that Steve had done nothing wrong; they believed he had nothing to do with it. However, just because he was found not guilty doesn't mean Steve was innocent. Therefore, Steve was a monster. Steve was a monster because he was friends with bad people.
Steve is a bad person because there was a robbery he knew was going to happen and didn’t tell anyone and let someone get killed so he is a monster. Also,Petrocelli giving her speech and saying Steve was involved with the robbery. The book said,“‘ The man who was to enter the store and check it out is sitting at the other table. His name is Steven Harmon. ”’(Myers
Throughout the entire case, there was not enough evidence given for the jury to prove him guilty. Lorelle Henry was a person that witnessed part of the crime, and even said she never saw Steve in the store. With all of the evidence given, there was not enough for Steve to be found guilty and not be a good person. However, just because Steve was found not guilty doesn’t mean he was innocent. Therefore, Steve was a monster.
First, O’Brien persuades Steve into believing in himself. O'Brien states, “I think they want to hear your side of the story. ”(215) She wants Steve to have the upper hand. He needs to put his side of the situation out there and make his face known.