Lieutenant General Doyle: Balanced Approach To Environmental Issues

He believes there are other ways to end Obama’s war on coal than to put the lives of coal miners and their families at risk. Using clean coal is one alternative Rockefeller presents instead of blocking the EPA’s rules on the pollutant gases. The safety of West Virginians is in his best interest. This speech reflects his ideas and beliefs about the past, present, and future use of coal. He supports the EPA’s rules on limiting mercury, acid gases, and other toxic pollution from power plants.

Lennon says, “Within the first 20 years, methane escaping from within and around the wells, pipelines and compressor stations is 105 times more powerful a greenhouse gas then carbon dioxide” (pg#). This is really good use of this strategy because this makes an appeal to logos. This make Lennon more credible because he is using very good shocking facts in his article. This makes the readers trust him and helps his audience side with his argument of how bad fracking is. This is so because this is how the gas is getting produced is from the dangerous fracking which doesn’t just release bad greenhouse gases but also fouls our wells and makes our water undrinkable.

Nuclear power produces fewer carbon emissions than traditional energy sources because energy is not produced by burning molecules but splitting atoms. ‘An energy mix including nuclear power has the lowest impact on wildlife and Ecosystems’ as shown by a Conservation Biology paper. Consequently, greenhouse gas emissions have reduced by nearly half which shows the benefits and popularity of nuclear power use. Nuclear power has many environmental benefits such as small waste production, leaves no adverse effect on water, land or any habitats. By reducing fossil fuel consumption and switching to Nuclear Energy, we will sustain the environment, quality of air, improving the overall quality of

Since the United States will be getting their own natural gases from fracking then that means the “United States will not have to buy and import natural gases from other countries, saving money in the process” (Rogowsky) therefore the “United States will become more independent and not rely on other countries” (Rogowsky). This is important because the people of the United States will also be able to save money because “the gas prices for cars will go down significantly as the gas supply goes up” (Rogowsky). Not only this, but the prices for medicine are sure to decline as well, “natural gases are an important chemical feedstock in some packaging medicine” (Rogowsky). With fracking, the medicine prices will take a dive also resulting in the American people saving money. With the increase of fracking there will be a higher supply of gas and medicine, which makes the prices decrease and people will save

In the denouement, this group wholeheartedly believes that nuclear power plants are our future. Again, nuclear plants are more efficient than any other fossil fuel such as oil, coal and natural gas. They are also more reliable. Nuclear energy has no emissions and a cost that is better for the consumer.

“Nuclear power will help provide the electricity that our growing economy needs without increasing emissions. This is truly an environmentally responsible source of energy.” Michael Burgess Prior to the introduction of nuclear energy, fossil fuel was thought to be the only available source in producing energy. Although fossil fuel, such as coal, petroleum, and natural gas, contains high energy value, it produces too many harmful byproducts that ultimately pollute our environment. With the rising concerns over global warming as more and more greenhouse gases accumulate in our Earth’s atmosphere, many voice such opinions that new alternative, yet sustainable method must be adopted to produce energy.

Using natural gas from fracking is a better and safer alternative than using coal because natural gas does not emit as much carbon dioxide into our atmosphere. The graphs presented on natfuel.com shows that the amount of carbon dioxide

I am writing this report to advise the Far North Distrcit Council on the use of nuclear reactors as a power source. While New Zealand has a history of being anti-nuclear there are many benefits of having a nuclear power station. I will discuss the pros and cons of building a reactor and how they work. There are two types of nuclear reactors these are called fission and fusion. A fusion reaction takes place when two lighter atomic nuclei usually deuterium and tritium or helium are bonded into a heavier element and give off energy this is usually done by forcing them to collide at very high speeds in order to over come the force produced by coulombic repulsion.

There is no doubt that nuclear power plants are an efficient way to create electricity. The efficiency of nuclear power is determined similarly to other heat engines, the amount of electric power produced for each unit of thermal power gives the plant its thermal efficiency. Typical nuclear power plants achieve efficiencies around 33-37%, comparable to fossil fueled power plants. Higher temperature and more modern designs like the Generation IV nuclear reactors

The risks and benefits of nuclear power need to be carefully weighed before erecting a nuclear power plant. And, if a nuclear power plant is built proper training should be taught and the safety rules need

No air pollutants are produced through the production of nuclear energy ("Clean Air Energy") while widely used fossil fuels emit harmful amounts of Carbon Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxide into the air ("The Sources and Solutions: Fossil Fuels"). These chemicals can negatively affect human health. Nuclear plants produce clean energy, and worker safety has improved. The employee accident rate in nuclear plants decreased from 0.38 accidents in 1997 to 0.1 accidents in 2015 per 200,000 worker hours ("US Nuclear Industrial Safety Accident Rate"). Worker safety has shown continuous improvement with fewer workplace incidents as stricter safety measures are enacted.

Nuclear Power Nuclear power plants are the highest source of power. Making or building more power plants in the State of Connecticut will open up new job opportunities,ect.. The State of Connecticut should create more nuclear power plants. The benefits of nuclear power outweigh the risks. Nuclear power plants are known to be the fastest, cleanlier, and have no health or injury concern.

(“Nuclear Energy”,

Tu Le Professor Matlock English 1301 4 December 2017 Nuclear Energy To Be Utilized and Why Imagine if global warming and loss of ice are no longer a problem, if severe weather patterns are avoided, if the devastating consequences of climate change are averted and the world stable and controlled of its environmental responsibilities. Most people would assert that it is an impossible thing to do, however, it can also be argued that with current first-rate technology, the goal can undoubtedly be achieved. The rising suggested solution is the replacement of nuclear power as dominating energy source instead of present-day fossil fuels because nuclear supports contemporary lifestyle whilst attaining a sustainable environment. Since the Industrial

I’ve often wondered what benefits humanity could uncover with the application of this technology. Today, however, I plan on ceasing to ask questions so that I can instead answer them for myself. On the counts of recent news, national leaders have gathered in Sweden, such as our president, and have discussed the energy crisis caused by fossil fuels, which not only are resources to be completely depleted within this century, but also are causing atmospheric damage threatening our way of life. I believe that perhaps the answer to this dilemma lies within a forgotten power source such as nuclear energy. If my theory truly is false, at least what I'll be getting out of it is knowing that I'm less ignorant of the topic, which is always a positive thing for knowledge-seekers.