1. Introduction: The students were given an assignment and they could choose one of two topics, the chosen topic required them to do research in the form of discourse analysis, which will lead them to an understanding of this specific topic, Students have to discuss and answer the question in essay form. In the essay below Literacy will be discussed, more specifically the view on the traditional idea of literacy and the refinement of that theory that took place. Credits and deficiencies of the traditional view of literacy will be discussed as well as the personal view from the student’s understanding on whether they agree or disagree with the scholar’s argument. Students will also provide a reason to why they agree or disagree. Students are …show more content…
The New London Group then introduced a terminology called ‘Multiliteracies‘(Gee & Handford, 2013: 371). 2.2 Multiliteracies: Multiliteracies deal with multiple literacies in the aspect of practices that uses print literacy and numerous practices that involves multimodal texts that incorporates language and images simultaneously. Practices that were involved in new digital literacies were also studied. Perhaps one of the biggest contributions that the New London Group did was that literacy was influenced by how people used their languages. This includes grammar, symbols or ‘signs’ to produce and create their unique meanings within their practicing communities, this once again refers back to a diverse approach in the sense of a variety of cultural and social contexts ‘(Gee & Handford, 2013: …show more content…
According to Grenfell et al. (2013:29) states that a better term would be ideological model of literacy, the reason for that being that there are multiple versions of literacy and that they are based on a particular world-view. Social literacies inform us that literacy is always empowered in different ways from different people. Literacy is considered: “a social act imbued with power relations from the outset” (Grenfell et al., 2013:29). This means that influential members of society such as teachers and tutors influence the way in which their students become literate by interaction of social practices. These influential people possess a certain amount of power and does in fact affect literacy of
Dana Gioia creates a passage encouraging, influencing, and informing the reader of the recent literacy rate decline. He begins by verbalizing the problem, then moving to how it connects to business, then finally the decline affecting politics. Gioia uses evidence such as facts and quotes to support this idea and drive the thoughts into the reader’s head. These strategies, build his argument and assists with persuading the reader on how this decline will have a negative effect on society.
In this essay the author, Dana Gioia, discusses his opinion on the effect of a decline in reading. Gioia starts by introducing his topic and than giving his theme statement. Now we all know his purpose for the article. He begins his explanation by discussing the development of a young adults mind. The theme of reading being important to young adult’s, seems to flow through this piece.
In her text, “Cognition, Convention and Certainty,” Patricia Bizzell describes the writing process through both inner-directed and outer-directed theories in order to illustrate that the writing process is infirmed by both student’s natural thought processes and their discourse community She uses her text to explain both theories, and to argue for the implementation of a new pedagogy focused on discourse analysis. First, Bizzell introduces the inner –directed theory, which seeks to discover the writing processes through the universal and fundamental structure of language. Conversely, she explains that the outer-directed theory instead argues that the individual’s discourse community does not teach a generalized form of language but rather the
Literacy is at the heart of every facet of our lives and by taking it away you can make one’s life less than what it should be. These two mean prove how necessary it is for people to be educated so that they can advocate for themselves and lead the way on the path to their
Rhetorical Analysis of "How to Read and Write" (Frederick Douglass) During an era of slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and no hopes of abolition, Frederick Douglass invites his audience into a world where slavery enters the kindest of souls, and purifies the soul to have nothing but hatred and anger. In the empowering narrative, “Learning to Read and Write”, Douglass enunciates the cruelty of slavery and its pervasive impacts, with the help of Douglass’ vast journey to ultimately gain his thinking skills through reading and writing. Douglass expresses these actions with elaborate metaphors and immaculate details that keeps the audience on their toes to witness what happens next. Growing up as a slave, Douglass became curious about the art of reading
Influential people, whether positive or negative, are often remembered through history. Their actions are picked apart and analyzed, their lives dissected and studied for centuries. Influential people believe wholeheartedly in their cause and that it will ultimately benefit the people and place they are associated with. They have no qualms with the destruction of any obstacle, whether that obstacle is an opposing force, a political faction or an innocent people. Influential people often manipulate large populations by creating laws and restrictions allowing them to establish control.
Students should think about how it would affect their classmates before they open their mouths and how it will feel if it were reversed and it was done to
Rudolf Steiner, an Austrian philosopher and author, once stated, “The well-being of a community of people working together will be the greater, the less the individual claims for himself the proceeds of his work, the more of these proceeds he makes over to his fellow-workers, the more his own needs are satisfied, not out of his own work but out of the work done by others” (“Recording of Society”). This quote represents the true meaning of a discourse community. A discourse community is a group of social individuals that work together to reach a common goal, understand the same basic values and assumptions, and use a unique kind of communication to reach their set goal or purpose. A good example of a discourse community is the organization
In James Paul Gee’s essay “What Is Literacy?’ , he uses the key term ‘discourses’. Gee explains discourses as a placement in society or the belonging to a group in society. Gee states that it come from an individual’s saying, doings, or just their identity. As Gee elaborates on discourses he breaks them down into different areas in which relate to one another.
We communicate in many ways, either by email, telephone, text, face to face, social media or letters and the language we use allows us to get things done, nonetheless the language and communication method in which we chose to use can vary depending on the discourse community. Much like John Swales suggests a discourse community involves a group of people who share the same common public goals, such as shared interests, rules, structure, and vocabulary. When thinking about the several discourse communities I am evolved in, which include family, coaching football, college student, and a few friends. These discourse communities have influenced me, given me insight of where I come from and tell who I am as a person. I also believe much like Swales,
Creations, like most things in life, are improvable. Ideas and theories are always evolving into different ideas or more sophisticated ones. Discourse communities is a term that has been debated over the years. Three of those debaters are James Paul Gee, James P. Porter, and John Swales. In this essay I will analyze what each of these writers see as the definition of a discourse community while comparing specific points that each of them have regarding their personal view on the subject.
It’s how people connect, whether it is being able to read, write or being able to do construction. Everyone is literate in some area of a subject. I am also literate in music. I can read music notes because I sing and play the viola. Just like everything else in the world that you expect to get better at, it is important to practice.
To be multiliterate, a person is needed to be able to understand and function with numerous methods of communication. Multiliteracy involves being reading and writing literate and being able to understand and use technology to function and survive in the world of today. Technology is constantly changing and increasing and being multiliterate is of vital importance. I intend to discuss three important literacies in my life, being computer literate, reading and writing literate as well as health literacy. These literacies have helped me grow into the person I am today as well as gotten me as successful as I can be at my age.
In both groups, it is made evident that the literacy practices that they engage in, in both their dominant and non-dominant languages, through text, provides
The Language Culture and Society programme provides us with strong theoretical and interdisciplinary foundation for the study of a range of educational practices across the human lifespan and in a range of theoretical and methodological perspective is brought to bear on studies that explore the nature of literate practices, democracy and civic engagement and participation in social life. The programme focuses on relationships between education school and the dynamics and changing structures of language, culture, and society. It examines connection between broader, social, cultural, linguistic, historical, aesthetic and political factors in education and the local context in which these issues take place. It has long been recognized that language is an essential and important part of a given culture and that the impact of culture upon a given language is something intrinsic and indispensible. Language is a social phenomenon.