As Lawyer Farrington said, Lou Dempsey was accused of illegally selling alcohol to the minor, Eric Howe. Mr. Dempsey failed to meet his responsibilities of asking for identification and anticipating violence and/or accidents caused from alcohol. The amount of alcohol that was given to Mr. Howe, allowed each member attending the party to dissipate their sobriety after drinking four standard cups. He distributed two kegs to minor, Eric Howe, and states himself that it was not his fault for their actions at the keg party afterwards. According to Lou Dempsey’s deposition, the violence after the teenagers were given alcohol was not his fault. Mr. Dempsey knew that Mr. Howe was underage for he worked for Lou by doing lawn work. Mr. Howe’s affidavit says, “...I mowed his lawn for him and his wife. Lou has a …show more content…
When asked the question, “Are you aware that alcohol is a factor in many cases of violence,” he states, “Yes, but that’s not my fault.” Lou Dempsey also failed the experiment of conducting compliance checks. In Jerry Newman’s affidavit, he said that their crew sent in decoys into Mr. Dempsey’s store to examine whether or not he checked for identification for being under the age of 21. These checks are sent out each month and Lou Dempsey’s store failed two of the tests. When this happens the police staff suggests a beverage server training for the owner. Dempsey took no interest in the training. Lou avoided all tasks to prevent selling alcohol to a minor and used his personal emotions to determine the outcome. No thinking was involved to decide whether or not it was a good idea to sell to Mr. Eric Howe, for Mr. Dempsey thought that whatever was done with the alcohol was not his business. He knew relevant information about past occurrences including violence and alcohol, but did not use it to anticipate that this may actually happen at the keg
Richard “Bobo” Evans (pg 174) Bobo is a criminal who has been arrested for breaking and entering, grand theft auto, and fighting a guy that he killed. He is currently serving time for selling drugs. Bobo testifies for the prosecution in order to shorten his sentence.
On 03-21-2016, at approximately 9:25 am CSA Stewart observed Jalin D’Angelo Brown entering the search area with a grocery bag with a half of peanut butter and jelly sandwich with an unusual smell. Mr. Stewart asks Jalin Brown what was in the bag and Jalin replied, “It’s just a sandwich.” Upon a closer investigation of the sandwich, CSA Stewart realized that the sandwich was layered with an illegal substance. He took a closer look and noticed that it was “Marijuana called, “Loud,” which was over the interior of the bag. Jalin Brown was turned over to the Dean of Students (Mr. Barnes) and SRO Friday who also confirmed that the sandwich was layered with marijuana.
In 1980, Bobby Ray Dixon was convicted of raping and killing a woman in her home in Mississippi, and was sentenced to life in prison. The crime in questions took place in 1979. There was one witness to the crime: the victim’s four year-old son. Throughout the investigation, the four year old witness never waivered from his story that he had seen only one man raping and killing his mother. In spite of the young witness’ account, three people were arrested for this crime.
Facts. Appellee Donald Scott Chaney was convicted on two counts of forcible rape and one count of robbery. Chaney was found guilty on all three counts. Inculpatory evidence shows that Chaney and an acquaintance picked up the prosecutor in Anchorage, Alaska. Chaney and his companion proceeded to beat the prosecutor and forcibly rape her four times.
Tommy got up from playing games to shut the windows in his apartment and at that moment noticed that there was a silver edge sticking out of Jack’s koozie, instead of the maroon color of Dr. Pepper. Tommy immediately demanded that Jack pour the beer out by the time he was done shutting the windows. After Tommy shut all of the windows, he was then distracted because he immediately had to use the restroom. By the time Tommy was done using the restroom, Jack was being cited by IV foot patrol for minor in consumption.
In Mesa, the police arrested a twenty-eight-year-old step dad. They accused him of murdering his stepson. Everyone should be grateful to the police for making this arrest. The public can rest assured that this murderer will not kill their children.
DISPOSITIVE FACTS Mr. Berlinski had been drinking at his girlfriends’s home, a few blocks away from where he Officer Alvarez found and arrested him. Mr. Berlinski was asleep at the driver’s seat, with the keys in the ignition and the engine running; both the headlamps and the tail lights, the radio, and the A/C were on. He admitted to being drunk prior to his breathalyzer tests, which
Twenty-two year old, Andre Robinson should be convicted of a felony, for the hostile actions he has taken. Not only because it is categorized as animal cruelty, but as it was first, and foremost, intentional. Second, the situation could and should have been handled in a more mature way. Lastly, Robinson saw no problem with potentially murdering an innocent creature. Without question, Robinson should be required jail time; moreover, a full seven-year sentence, for his intentional abuse on King, the cat.
In the novel MONSTER, written by Walter Dean Myers, tells the story of two men under the age of 25 on trial for felony murder. Steve Harmon is a 16 year old boy who is accused of being the lookout to a robbery that James King, a 22 year old and his friend Bobo Evans were planning. James King is accused of being the one that ripped Alguinaldo Nesbit’s gun from him and used it to shoot and kill Mr.Nesbit. Prosecutor Sandra Petrocelli works to convince the jury that their age isn’t an excuse that a man died at their hands. Kathy O’brien and Asa Briggs both work as the attorneys to prove that one of these men are innocent.
Even though Marin Sinzer was considered a minor at eight years old when he murdered his neighbor, Tammy Shevin, now he should be charged as an adult. The problem now is if Marin should be charged as a minor or an adult because of the age Marin was when he committed the crime. Marin should be charged as an adult because he is now thirty-eight years old and is not a minor anymore. He knew what he did was wrong and decided to withhold evidence from the police for twenty-five years. There is no statute of limitations for murder in Missouri, so Marin could be tried for this murder at any time.
Facts In the late evening hours of October 30, 1992, Terry Toops, Warren Cripe, and Ed Raisor were at Toops’s home in Logansport, Indiana, drinking beer. Around 3:00 a.m. the following morning the trio decided to drive to a store in town. Because he was intoxicated, Toops agreed to allow Cripe to drive Toops’s car.
Summary of Case The events do not seem to have been planned in any sort of way or fashion but seem to be happening at the desire of the criminal during short periods of time and in high volume (latimes.com, 1989). Ramirez’s killings occurred in such a short period of time and with enough distance between them to prevent the authorities to capture him but still to relate him to the cases and to identify him to prevent general population of him. Most of the victims’ households property was stolen by Ramirez during and/or after the attacks. These robberies included items of great value that could not be tracked such as jewelry or clothes (latimes.com, 1989).
Once he was pulled over, he surrendered uncooperatively, due to being intoxicated. His actions would initiate, what would ultimately be the start of the impending
I just drink all the time and I didn't understand why he wanted to beat him up. Bob