The central purpose of this experiment was to determine the experimental empirical formula of an oxide of magnesium by performing a synthesis reaction. It was hypothesized that the formula that was derived from the recorded data would be identical to the theoretical empirical formula. After performing calculations with the data that had been collected within the duration of the experiment, it was deduced that the empirical formula of the product generated by the synthesis reaction was Mg5O6. Since the calculated formula did not match the postulated formula, MgO, the inceptive hypothesis was confuted. There was a large discrepancy in the results of students who replicated this experiment, the variation in data possibly having been evoked by the dissimilarity in …show more content…
However, the formula that was ascertained from the experimental data had been Mg5O6. It was anticipated that the experimental and theoretical empirical formulas would have been identical; since this was not the case, the hypothesis was nullified. There are various possible factors that might have induced this result. For instance, since there was not any equipment available in order to control the amount of oxygen that came into contact with the magnesium ribbon, their masses were not regulated into specific proportions. Also, even though human efforts were made to visibly observe the magnesium ribbon, it was extremely difficult to detect the exact time when the magnesium had been completely reduced to ash. As a result, slight time measurement errors might have occurred that consequentially impaired the results. These errors could be avoided in future repetitions of this experiment by curbing the quantity of oxygen that is combined with the magnesium, as well as keeping the lid of the crucible open at all times, so as to continuously observe the substance inside, without threatening to potentially subvert any other
An error that could have been present during the lab includes not letting the zinc react completely with the chloride ions by removing the penny too early from the solution. For instance, the percent error of this lab was 45.6%, which was determined by the subtraction of the theoretical percent of Cu 2.5% and the experimental percent of Cu 3.64% and dividing by the theoretical percent of Cu 2.5%. This experiment showed how reactants react with one another in a solution to drive a chemical reaction and the products that result from the
Conclusion: Compare Trial 1 and Trial 2. The Trial 1 change in mass are 12.5g, however Trial 2 changes in mass is 1.2g. The Trial 1 change in mass is more than Trial 2. And I think the Low of Conservation of Mass violated in the Trial 1 is can be exist. Because the Trial 1 actually the soda with vinegar have Chemical reactions occur and chemical
Each square in millimeter grid was one millimeter. In this experiment, we predicted the speed of Paramecium will increase if we add Magnesium
Students first prepped for the lab by cleaning out the crucible. Three boiling chips were added in the crucible once it was wiped out with a paper towel. The crucible was then placed on a clay triangle two finger widths above the Fischer burner. After 10 minutes of the crucible being directly under the flame, the it was clean and students allowed time for it to cool down. Next, the students from then on used tongs to transport the crucible from weighing it and back to the clay triangle.
3mL of the liquid in each of the vials were added into cuvettes and measured in the spectrophotometer. Before each time point the photo spectrometer was zeroed using a cuvette with 3mL of distilled water. If any of the results were considered unusual the machine was zeroed again and the sample was retested. The results from the spectrophotometer test were recorded in a table. The experiment was repeated six times to gain a sample size of six.
The purpose of this lab was to determine the percent water in magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, or Epsom salt. The experimental percent water is determined to be 42.06% in both trials, making the average also 42.06%. To determine this percent water a heating and cooling procedure was used. First, the vials were cleaned of impurities using the lab oven and were not touched after this point.
The purpose of this experiment is to perform a two step reductive amination using o-vanillin with p-toluidine to synthesize an imine derivative. In this experiment, 0.386 g of o-vanillin and 0.276 g of p-toluidine were mixed into an Erlenmeyer flask. The o-vanillin turned from a green powder to orange layer as it mixed with p-toludine, which was originally a white solid. Ethanol was added as a solvent for this reaction. Sodium borohydride was added in slow portion as the reducing agent, dissolving the precipitate into a yellowish lime solution.
agnesium, a chemical element whose atomic mass is 24.31 is the 9th most abundant, found in universe. The atomic number of magnesium is 12 and its symbol is mg. Elemental magnesium is strong and is a light weight metal. It is not necessary to store this element in a oxygen free environment as it is coated by a layer of oxide that is hard to remove and fairly impermeable.
One big error was the inaccurate information. The error mainly had to deal with the type of rocks used in the experiment. The lava rocks did help but easily fractured into sediments. So it was difficult to gather accurate weight after the trial was done because all of the small sediments couldn’t be gathered and weighed. If this experiment is to be done again in the future, it would be best to change the type of rock that is used in the experiment.
Throughout the experiment, copper was altered a total of 5 times, but after the final chemical reaction, solid, elemental copper returned. Each time the solution changed color, a precipitate formed, or when gas appeared, indicated that a chemical reaction was occurring. For the first reaction, copper was added to nitric acid, forming the aqueous copper (II) nitrate (where the copper went), along with liquid water, and
All sources I have used in this paper, are from the Internet. I have compared information from different angles to try to get a comprehensive and “objective” view of the experiment. A main source of information is the report from Dr Zimbardo whom was in charge of the experiment. Information is also collected from
The dissolution of the salt could be reversed by evaporating the water as shown in part one of the experiment, just as evaporating the water could be reversed by adding water as demonstrated in part two of the
Verna Wang Hannah Palmer CHEM 101-069 Lab 11-19-16 Stoichiometry and Limiting Reagents Lab Report Purpose: We are using the reaction of sodium hydroxide and calcium chloride to illustrate stoichiometry by demonstrating proportions needed to cause a reaction to take place. Background: Just like a recipe would call for a specific amount of one ingredient to a specific amount of another, stoichiometry is the same exact method for calculating moles in a chemical reaction. Sometimes, we may not have enough of or too much of one ingredient , which would be defined as limiting and excess reagent, respectively.
The data was handled accurately, values clearly labeled and calculated in the correct procedure. The procedure of reacting magnesium with oxygen was most likely the source of error. It is possible that the magnesium strip had not completely reacted with oxygen yet when I took the crucible off the burner and dropped distilled water into it.
CHAPTER 6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 6.1. INTRODUCTION The experiment gave the knowledge about various things and various factors played their significance role in it. The experiment stated the Chromium removal and for that we had drawn a calibration curve (graph 6.1) between Absorbance on y axis and concentration on x axis through the table 6.1 as given below. To make calibration curve, we needed the absorbance of the Chromium solution which we got from atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS).