Mellivan And Melin Case Study

Sgt. Gurniak ordered that P should be arrested for violating the order of protection causing P to threaten MOS and spit at them. P was placed in the back of a RMP and during the drive to the precinct P continued to threaten and yell at MOS. P also kicked the RMP’s rear passenger-side window causing the window’s glass to shatter and strike MOS De La Cruz in the face. Then, P also attempted to break the rear driver’s side window.

Stark noticed the Officer Safety issue with interviewing the Victim in front of the door, and asked him to move to the side away from the flow of pedestrian traffic. Stark spoke with the Officer that had responded prior to our arrival and got the information that the Officer had already obtained. Stark re-interviewed the Victim, and come to the conclusion that the crime elements of PC211 were not met. I asked Stark what he believed the crime was, he stated PC 484 - petty theft. Stark gave the Victim a business card with the report number.

Good morning I am Luke Thomsen, I am representing the State of Maycomb on a case about Sheriff Heck Tate’s poor investigation. On two counts we will first hear about his poor investigation in the Tom Robinson V, Mayella Ewell case and in the death of Bob Ewell for we never found out who truly murdered Bob Ewell for Sheriff Heck was too lazy to document it. THE THEME AND THEORY

Main issue: Did Bozeman have knowledge of the harassment, and should Bozeman’s knowledge of McLeod’s harassment of Williamson be imputed to the City for purposes of holding that it knew or should have known of the harassment and therefore can be held liable for negligently failing to take prompt remedial action? 6. Court Deciding: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 7. Decision: The decision of the District Court was affirmed.

Describe the circumstances that caused police to pull Wayne Williams over? The police were staking out the bridges because the last victim was dumped in the river, and he was in his car driving slowly across the bridge after the police heard a splash that sounded like a body. Why does he think he was convicted?

They decided to go to three district courts to

This essay will consider whether Robert Solomon should receive a Vye direction at the end of his trial. This will be approached from the defence position and therefore will identify the arguments to support Robert having a Vye direction. Vye directions were established in the case of Vye and are given by the judge when summing up to the jury. There are two limbs to this direction. The first limb relates to the defendant’s credibility and is only available to defendants who made pre-trial statements or give evidence.

Johnson's suit against Paris and LCC is based on several theories. With respect to LCC, plaintiff alleges that LCC breached its college-student contract with plaintiff by arbitrarily and in bad faith denying him his diploma, LCC tortuously interfered with plaintiff's contract with Paris, LCC misused the confidential information that Paris divulged thereby violating the Mental Health and Developmental Disabilities Confidentiality Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 91 1/2, par. 801 et seq.) , LCC invaded plaintiff's privacy by publicly accusing him of homosexuality.

The purpose of this paper is to help Rose’s attorney out for her Appellate Review. Rose was convicted of killing her roommate. There are a lot of issues regarding this case and there is a big possibility that Rose is innocent. While reviewing the case I find out that there were issues with the jurors which should have resulted in a Batson challenge. Another issue was the whether or not it was beneficial for Rose to take the plea.

Both men were successful in their appeals as a verdict of guilty could not be settled upon as the case was based on improbabilities and circumstantial evidence that could not lead to a definite

Furthermore, this observation offered a perspective on the progression and resolution of the situation, enabling the court to effectively evaluate the legitimacy of the allegations levied against the defendant (Sweeney, 2020). Moreover, the testimonies provided by these witnesses played a crucial role in assessing the credibility of the accused, considering the presented

Paul, the evidence from the DA’s office, the doctors, members of the Children's Institute International (CII) and clients. He had to work together with them to defend his case. This was shown when a plea bargain was offered to Ms. MaMartin. 2. How significant was discretion with respect to the defense attorney?

The commanding officer at the scene had an ethical duty to stop what was occurring that night, but choose not to do so. The next ethical decision by leadership that was obvious was the lack of planning by the emergency operations organization. Chief Gates and Mayor Bradley were not prepared for the non-guilty verdicts of the officer’s trials. Thus, they did not prepare for what was about to happen to their city. The failure to not call one emergency operations organization meeting during the trial was a very poor

It confirms the already assumed. During the court trial, Dr. Jones was asked “From your conversations and examination of Perry Edward Smith, do you have an opinion as to whether he knew right from wrong at the time of the offense involved in this action?” (296). The doctor replies with a simple no. I strongly disagree what the doctor decides to reply. He claims he has no opinion because of Perry having no opinion.

From a well educated background, his qualifications verify his interpretation to Martin Guerre’s case. Not only was he present for the trial, he was one of the ten judges overseeing the case. He was also a skilled lawyer and professor at a university. He