Mind-Body Identity: The Mind As Software Theory

Many people underestimate the ability of the mind. Some do not fully realize that we all have a brain, but it is the experiences that a person has that make up the mind. With such experiences, the mind has the capability to recall and judge. Due to such dynamics, the mind should be considered as a crucial attribute in the daily lives of us humans as it can either daunt us or help us. However, the mind can be controlled to a certain extent.

Historical Conceptions of an Enduring Issue This paper examines the views and philosophies of multiple significant contributors to the mind and body scholarly discussion. In addition, this paper discusses the antecedents of the schools of thought in modern psychology while also focusing on the mind-body relationship and correlation to introspection. This paper also asserts that mind and body belong to one being, which assists in interpreting environment and situations, enabling and verbalizing internal emotions and thoughts. The historical contributions will be examined for multiple themes that serve as the theoretical foundation, such as the mind-body relationship, introspection, and structuralism.

Conclusion: The mind is substantively different from the body and indeed matter in general. Because in this conception the mind is substantively distinct from the body it becomes plausible for us to doubt the intuitive connection between mind and body. Indeed there are many aspects of the external world that do not appear to have minds and yet appear none the less real in spite of this for example mountains, sticks or lamps, given this we can begin to rationalize that perhaps minds can exist without bodies, and we only lack the capacity to perceive them.

What is the Mind? Introduction To try and explore the ‘mind’ it is necessary to examine if the mind and the brain are separate or if the mind and body are distinct from one another? Is the mind and body separate substance or elements of the same substance? Is consciousness the result of the mechanisms of the brain, wholly separate from the brain or inextricably linked?

For example, if the brain stops working it doesn’t affect the mind because the mind continues to exist. The Body-Mind Problem is the philosophical question of how the mind and body are related and if the mind is a non-physical substance. We

Similar to the Mechanical Model, during the 1950s, the Body-Mind Model was created, otherwise known as Era II. The Body-Mind Model includes a person’s consciousness, feelings, beliefs and spirits. It was believed to affect our bodies as well as cause illnesses.

Much of the work done to support the theory of personal identity has been through thought experiment and illusory scenarios. The psychological approach to personal identity discusses the theory of memory and the importance of our mind and brain in personal identity and creating who we are as an individual. Likewise, the psychological approach to personal identity addresses the role of our brain in creating what we’ve become through our past experiences. John Locke, the key theorist in the theory of memory believed consciousness and personal identity were strongly related. However, this theory fails to acknowledge a person’s beliefs, desires or characteristics through which they express themselves through.

Systems change, this is dependent on what happens across and within the boundaries. The theory comprises of a number of important concepts, these include: Input, throughput, output, Feedback loops and entropy. It is theorized that information received by an individual across a boundary, affects their thought processes and patterns cause a change in their

Various philosophers and scientists have inquired about the mind and body issue for a long time. The mind-body philosophies try to explain the way a person’s mental state and processes are linked to the physical state. The core of the mind and body is that individuals have a biased experience of an inner life that appears detached from the physical world. Although they are separated, they need to work together in some way. Individuals may appear to have physical properties and mental properties.

The argument of whether or not a human has a soul has been argued throughout centuries. Derek Parfit discusses two separate theories of personal identity, Ego Theory and Bundle Theory. The argument of which present a more accurate account of personhood is very hard to determine. The Ego Theory has some flaws such the soul is separate from the body and is a immaterialist object within us. Bundle Theory is reinforced and proven by the split-brain case, however it can lead to the argument that there is no self.

This theory is used by individuals to make sense and understand the process of social interactions that they are surrounded by, when communicating

The mind just is behavior. Behavior is physical thus is the mind is physical. Objections To Identity Theory There are a few objections when it comes to the identity thoery. The Leibniz's Law of Identity says that if two objects are identical, then they have all of the same properties.

In TA theory, an individual is observed not only his/her internal psychological dynamics but focus more on the transaction or the interactions of an individual

Of which the outward reaction is the visible or physical reaction that happens because of the first reaction and can likewise be seen as the input to the message. Explaining this theory further, see, hear, and so forth are stimulus, that leads you to an

He provides criteria of personal identity through time that consist of the necessary and sufficient conditions for the survival of persons. He considered personal identity to be based on consciousness (memory and experience) and not on the physical matter of the body. He argued that many people hastily identify the physical brain with consciousness. The body and the brain are physical objects; therefore, it is subject to change whilst consciousness consistently remains the same. Consequently, personal identity is not located in the brain, but in consciousness.