New England Colonies Vs Southern Colonies Essay

658 Words3 Pages

The New England and Southern Colonies at first came across as very similar. Both of the colonies had a big group of people that came from England. The motivations that the two colonies had were different which caused them to go into two completely different directions. A big difference that they faced was that the New England colonies had a very strict religion. The Southern colonies were primarily focused on the economic prosperity. The New England Colonies were Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire. The English colonies were also considered to be quit lucky. England tended to surpass other nations in their business practices (Puncher, 2004). The Joint-Stock Company was a big success for them. It had a few advantages over other businesses. The Joint-Stock Company helped out by not dissolving the death of the main owner and by limiting their liability, in which …show more content…

The government in New England was based on town meetings and voting on who best fit for the position. They mainly had self-government. The Southern Colonies had two systems of government, Royal and Monarchy. The difference between these two systems is that Royal was run by a kind and Monarchy was run by an elite group of people. They basically had a Representative government where the economic chain of command determines who has a say in government. The New England and Southern Colonies were very different than alike. Even though they both were religious in a certain way, New England still took it to a different level. Both of these colonies had completely different outlooks on how to live. There was a very broad variety in the Colonies as well. The Southern Colonies focused a lot on growing different crops to trade and to make a profit by having dominance in agriculture. Politics, economics, and religion are what set these colonies apart. Each of them had their struggles and accomplishments throughout

Open Document