Imagine this: a knock of the door. You answer it, not suspecting a thing. As soon as you open it people come barging into your house, steal your beloved pet, and run for their van as they drive away. At this moment you stand, speechless. Millions of questions go through your head, but a note catches your eye. Your animal will be used for a new drug research, it says.Now, they may not come barging into your house, but the principle is the same. Animals are being tested (tortured). Animal testing shoulde be illegal, since it’s cruel, inaccurate, and is simply a disadvantage.Don’t believe me? Just keep reading.
First of all, animal testing is cruel.Would you like having to be caged up with barely enough room to breath, until you get heavily tested on drugs, and very possibly die?I didn’t think so. Animals are being tortured right now, and as you will learn, the information obatained from the tests are not that accurate.Anther point: would you like your pet to go through the above described disaster? The answer should be no. If we won’t do it to humans, why should we do it to animals?To get you to
…show more content…
Having to test animals for drugs, for example, is a terrible idea because no animal can replace a human. An animal, let’s say, a rat, for example, might not react to a certain drug. But does that prove anything? Yes, it proves that the drug has no effect on rats, but rats have different characteristics than humans. The research does not prove that humans will not react to a drug.The same applies to behavioural research. Humans have a way more complex brain than any other animal. How can you even consider comparing chimps to us? They look likes us, sure, but can they learn to drive a car? Did they ever have to work on a deadline? Of course not. To prove my point, in the early 1960, a research has been conducted to prove tobacco use causes cancer. They forced animals to inhale smoke, but in the end, none of them ever got cancer, even if we
The fact of the matter can be stated in the most simple words, animal testing doesn’t give sufficient information for human matters. According to Cruelty Free International, only 6% of the 4,300 international companies involved in drug development has registered a new drug with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration since 1950. Which would mean
Animal testing may seem wonderful and innocent but in reality it is atrocious. One compelling reason to prove animal testing is atrocious is that animal testing is unreliable and ineffective. In fact, different species of animals can react differently to the same substance. This shows that if species react differently, you can't be sure it’s safe on another different species, humans.
Animal testing has been a controversial issue for the past thirty years. Society feels as if animal testing is a technique of the past and should be outlawed in the United States like the majority of the world. Federal law shows us how little protection animals have, numerous recalled or discontinued medications are proof that research on animals to predict effects on the human body is highly unreliable. The humane society provides numerous examples of the cruel treatments and conditions animals must endure. Scientists have presented us with alternatives that are more cost-effective and produce less waste with higher accuracy rates.
Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year. Animal testing is a cruel and inhumane way to obtain research and knowledge. Animals can be very different from humans leaving researchers with poor test results. Animal experimentation is no longer necessary for research because of the abundance of solutions and alternatives to solve this issue and keep animals away from harm. For years, many people have been trying to control the amount of animal experimentation that's going on in society and its finally starting to pay off.
In “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous.” This shows that doing experiments on animals are unreliable and do not always have the same effect on humans. In addition, animal experimentation is unethical and unreliable and it puts the animals in
Abstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.
Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries
Since its inception, animal testing has been a source of major controversy. Animal testing dates back to 500 B.C.,where it finds its origins in ancient Greece. For centuries, innocent animals have been used in testing laboratories for products and medicines and ultimately killed as a result. They are literally tested to death. Every year, over 110 million animals die in U.S. laboratories alone.
Would you like it if your pet ended up getting killed due to an experiment?Animal
Various factors impact the inaccurate information that is established during animal experimentation. Incorrect results from animal experimentation have the potential to be influenced more as the utilization increases by scientists. Professionals have disclosed that “nine out of ten drugs that appear promising in animal studies go on to fail in human clinical trials” (“Results from Research”). This statistic illustrates how more than 90% of the information tested in laboratories does not accurately compare to humankind. The differences in biological structures between an animal and an individual causes more difficulty when discovering beneficial similarities.
Joseph Lister, a British surgeon, said that “animal experiments had been essential to his own work… and that to restrict research with animals would prevent discoveries” (Botting, Morrison 1). Animal testing has been essential for a long time and will continue to be that way. Therefore, animal testing can help make discoveries that will overall help mankind.
Should animals be suffering just because humans are trying to advance our medical techniques? Should they be forced to eat? Should people be allowed to torture them this way? Do you think so? In fact, more than 100 million animals are killed each year during scientific and commercial testing, in the U.S alone.
Who in the right mind would volunteer for such a risky experiment that may lead to a complete disaster? There may be some people who are willing to take that chance, however millions of test subjects are required. To overcome this issue, animal vivisection or animal testing would be a common practice in the laboratory. Animal vivisection is the act of testing on live animals which act as involuntary subjects with the goal of experimentation or research purposes carried out by scientists or researchers. The practice of animal vivisection, or better known as animal testing, has dated back around 300 B.C. Humans were not used as test subjects as it was rather unethical and it would go against certain religions.
This proves how immoral it is to test on animals especially since the law does not require the cosmetics to be tested. The most plausible answer for why the animals are being tested on is a business wants to make money and if the business cosmetic is unsafe and harms one human then no one is going to want to buy another cosmetic from that business. This could leave a business with no
According to the database “Using Animals for Medical Testing is Unethical and Unnecessary”: “ Before their deaths some are forced to inhale toxic fumes, others are immobilized in restraint devices for hours, some have holes drilled into their skulls, and others have their skin burned off or their spinal cords crushed. In addition to the torment of the actual experiments, animals in laboratories are deprived of everything that is natural and important to them-they are confined to barron cages, socially isolated, and psychologically traumatized. They think, feeling animals who are used in experiments are treated nothing like and nothing more than disposable laboratory equipment. This shows that they are treated horribly and they don't care if the animals get hurt. They don't bother to make them feel like they are where they are supposed to be and so they don't act how they normally would which could throw off the results of the product testing.