Persuasive Essay Pro Death Penalty

Whether a criminal is guilty of committing murder or any other capital offense, they should all be given the same sentence - life in prison. How is it fair to allow them to voluntarily choose the death penalty over prison? Criminals willingly sought to break the law and should endure the lifelong debt they owe not only to society but to the family of the innocent victims whose lives have been taken. As asserted by Robert Johnson, a professor of justice and law, and Sandra Smith, a professor of legal studies, death by incarceration is a more effective and suitable form of punishment than the death penalty (Cromie and Zott 174). Although some might argue that it is unfair to keep a criminal alive, they fail to understand that the freedom they once had is permanently lost.

For instance, many believe that capital punishment deters violent crime. While it is difficult to produce sufficient evidence to support this claim, common sense, more or less, tells us that if people know they’ll die performing a certain act, they will NOT do it. Manuel Valasquez of the New York Times, claims that “If the threat of death has, in fact, stayed the hand of many a would be murderer, and we abolish the death penalty, we will sacrifice the lives of many innocent victims whose murders could have been deterred. But if, in fact, the death penalty does not deter, and we continue to impose it, we have only sacrificed the lives of convicted murderers.” To translate, if the death penalty is ridden of, the people who committed the crimes will continue to perform the crimes, but if the death penalty is still imposed, the lives of convicted murderers will be put to rest.

Today many old issues are being raised again about how and who the penalty is carried out on. Only 32 states in the United States still use the death penalty, other states have banned it for various reasons. One of those reasons is because the amount of money it costs to execute an inmate sometimes costs more than it would to just give them life imprisonment. Another reason is because the process of capital punishment can take up to fifteen years; so many states would rather just give life sentences than have to go through that. Even though there are reasons to ban the death penalty, there are reasons to keep it

While in class may groups discussed abolishing the death penalty entirely due to the recurring mistakes that are made during convention process. These groups classified the value being put in jeopardy as an individual's right to life, which goes against a utilitarianist view. A common argument relied on a utilitarianist view, with the thought that a life in prison instead of the death penalty would increase the overall happiness of society. I tend to disagree with the totality of this argument. Instead of doing away with this punishment altogether, society needs to practice it less frequently and give more resources to the judicial system.

As my opponent has stated that it may be inhuman to take a life, but when you use the death penalty you are making sure that criminal or person. who had just died will stay down and their crime spree will end. It is also cheaper a lethal injection can rise up to 1,300 dollars while putting a criminal behind bar it cost up to 31,286 dollars per inmate so now the government can finally pay off the U.S debt of twenty-five trillion dollars and if we don’t use the death penalty it will take 398,879,561 years and it’s with the death penalty and without it and if we only use the death penalty the debt it will take about 12,749 years. There are also many criminals that you should be glad are deceased such as John Wayne Gacy also known as the killer

Death Penalty According to the 2010 Gallup Poll, 64% of the United State of America are supporting the death penalty, I as an American am part of that 36% that is against it. I do not believe that we as human being should determine whether another person should live or die. A second reason that I am against the death penalty is for the reason that the accused person could be innocent and normally the accused person only has one court presentation and is only judged by the judge not a jury of their peer, and is sent to death row where they pay for a crime that they haven’t done. My final reason that i do not believe that the death penalty should count as a punishment for the American people is because, a person that has done a massive massacre shouldn’t just be able to leave the world just like that without paying and suffering for what they have done, Or should the death punishment continue as it is for it has a great benefit to us as citizens of the United States.

Murder or legitimized slaughtering? Consider the circumstance, was the wrongdoing finished with the expectation or for a specific reason other than retribution. It is imperative to examine in light of the fact that criminologist say the death penalty doesn't help anything, it just exacerbates it. The criticalness to contend this point is that capital punishment out-courses existence without the chance for further appeal. These are the kind of inquiries that should be tended to.

Imagine a world in which no harm could be done without punishment. The world would seem to be a much simpler place would it not? Everyone would get away with everything such as murder, rape, theft and those people would live on a happy life. The answer to that is no, no one should get away with the brutality of murder, or rape. The first execution in Connecticut was done in 1639 to a man named Nepauduck for murder.

  The same goes for “Death Penalty.”   It is a deterrent to a violent crime, the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. Although in some cases capital punishment fails to recognize that guilty people have the potential to change, denying them the chance to ever rejoin society. People deserve a second chance Weather or not it’s a violent crime

In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

According to “Death penalty Center, 80% of experts rejected the notion that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder. (M. Radelet & T. Lacock.) And according to the deathpenalty.org, without the death penalty we have lower crime rates. The South accounts for 80% of US executions and has the most regional murder rate. (D.Cooper).

Waiting in a prison cell for many years, an inmate in death row doesn’t know when his life will come to an end. This is a law under the U.S. government that is allowed to kill people who have committed a crime that’s grave enough. If someone commits a capital crime, they will be punished legally under the law. Taking a rope to the neck, or charging volts to the brain, it’s what people are fighting against today. Organizations are taking action against the death penalty by researching, publishing, and exposing facts whenever officials want to abuse their power with the law.

There is a dramatic relationship between the number of executions carried out and a comparable reduction in the number of murders. It shows that the death penalty can scare off the criminals from killing someone and making them rethink of whether they should go on with the crime or

Imagine every prisoner change their way of living and the whole world are actually living in harmony instead of cruelty. Many people died because of the crime and justice is the only answer that victims can provide as solution for the problem, but many times the innocent always deal with the consequences and imagine the damage of the crime can do in their lives. Also imagine what these inmates can do for the community instead of dying in the electric chairs. If everyone learn how to forgive and move on from the past and leave it as the lesson for their lifetime, many people will not committed crimes. This essay will explain why death penalty isn’t right for convict and what are the possible solutions.

Capital Punishment “Under what circumstances is it moral for a group to do that which is not moral for a member of that group to do alone?” (Heinlein, . In recent years, the use of the death penalty has slowly decreased, yet the flaws and failures of the system are more apparent than ever (NCADP, “About the Death Penalty”). The death penalty is a system that plays God, and should be eliminated because of wrongly accused inmates, the cost, and the harm toward prison workers.