How the Point of View Can Change Everything Why do we need to know the different points of view of a book? Or why does it matter? Sometimes, if you just leave it how it is, the reader can get confused and not know what is happening in the book, or in other words, they are lost. In the book In Cold Blood by Truman Capote, Capote switches the point of view in almost every chapter to keep the reader hooked. At the beginning of the book, he likes to switch from the Clutters and then to Dick and Perry. When Capote switches the point of view in the chapters this opens up, the complexity of the text and how we get to learn more about the characters, with the killings in the book we get to see what each character’s view on the murders and we get to …show more content…
In the book In Cold Blood, Truman Capote switches the points of view between the Clutter family and the murders Dick and Perry. During the first part of the book, we got to know the Clutters family more than Dick and Perry. After the murders took place We learned more about Dick and Perry we wanted to know what they were doing at the same time the police were investigating the case. At the end of a chapter Capote says, “‘When this is cleared up, I’ll wager whoever did it was someone within ten miles of where we now stand’” (Capote 88). The next chapter switches to Dick and Perry’s points of view, and Dick states, “‘But on the whole it was perfect. We hit the ball right out of the park. It’s lost. And it’s gonna stay lost. There isn’t a single connection’” (91). The first quote helps explain that the people don’t know who the murderers are quite yet and they can not imagine who they could be because they couldn’t think of someone who could do such a thing. Dick thinks at that time he believes that they are home free and that they will never get caught. When Capote switches the point of view between these chapters it helps us understand how the characters think and it gives us a general idea of what the character think and …show more content…
One major cliffhanger that Capote left the readers with was after the murders of the Clutter family. At the end of one chapter, we are left with, “His legs trembled; the pain in his knees made him perspire. He wiped his face with a paper towel. He unlocked the door and said, ‘O.K. Let’s go.’” (55). At the time we don’t know what they are going to do except for Dicks idea of his “score”. We are left clueless and we are curious about what is going to happen. Later on in the same chapter, we find out more about what they have done, “‘ I thought mauve the child was hurt. It seemed to me the first thing to do was call an ambulance. Miss Kidwell-Susan-she told me there was a telephone in the kitchen. I found it right where she said. But the receiver was off the hook, and when I picked it up, I saw the line had been cut’” (60). At the end of this chapter, we begin to speculate what they have done. This allows the reader to get hooked and want to read
Readers feel a sense of sorrow for Alvin Dewey when Capote describes his late nights working the case, not coming home to his wife, or immediately going to bed as soon as he got home. Capote creates sympathy for Dewey by acknowledging a phone call conversation between Dewey and his wife: “...Dewey interrupted the consultation to telephone his wife, Marie, at their home, and warn her that he wouldn’t be home for dinner. She said, “Yes. All Right, Alvin,” but he noticed in her tone an uncharacteristic anxiety (Capote 87).” Truman Capote provides the phone call conversation between Alvin Dewey and his wife, Marie, to draw the reader’s attention to how many late nights he stayed at the office, trying to crack down on any information that would help solve the case.
• Tone – Throughout this novel, Capote’s tone towards the case stayed objective yet compassionate. It seemed as if he wanted to capture every single moment of each character’s points of view. “Know what I think?” said Perry. “I think there must be something wrong with us. To do what we did.”
Dick and Perry come from completely different backgrounds and Capote leaves the reader wondering if their childhood experiences had an effect on their decisions as adults. Dick and Perry had no intentions of killing in the beginning however, they are left running from the police with no plan
If needed, they decide that they will kill any witnesses, and Perry begins to have second thoughts. This leads to Dick following through the plans to prove his masculinity. Throughout the novel, I have noticed a competitive relationship they share as they both try to prove themselves to each other. The significance of this quote tells the readers the reason why the Clutters were murdered. During their attempt of finding the safe, they were encountered by many different problems which led to frustration and tension between the pair.
However, the two murderers never took the time to find out more about the Clutter family. Once they realized there was no fortune, Dick did not mind. Dick’s motive for remaining inside the Clutter home was he knew there was a young girl living in the house. His motive was to rape the young girl, Nancy. Nonetheless, the other murderer, Perry Smith, had no motive for killing the Clutter family after realizing there was no fortune.
Dick uses the hero’s journey structure to illustrate the theme that individual liberty is more important than collective security by demonstrating how the main character goes through the Call Of Adventure stage. Anderton is showing Witwer the function of precrime when the machine prints him as a future murder. In the text, it says “On the card was his name. Line one — an already accused future murderer! According to the code punches, Precrime Commissioner John A. Anderton was going to kill a man — within the next week.”
That specific phrasing can make someone’s skin crawl, and sounds like something one would find in a coroner’s report rather than a novel. Later, Capote goes on to talk about what happened to the townsfolk after, and how it was almost
Capotes creates sympathy for Detective Dewey by allowing the reader to think about what it would be like to have family member who is extremely involved in work about the
Contrastingly, the opposite opinion is revealed through the character Alvin Dewey in the book. Capote writes about Dewey’s beliefs on the case: “[The Clutter family] had experienced prolonged terror, they had suffered. And Dewey
Additionally, Capote expressed the idea of there being two sides to every story for both the protagonist and antagonist. By doing so, he used a unique writing style to help develop the story. In Cold
While Dick’s attempt to profit from Perry originates from a lie that Perry creates in order to gain Dick’s respect, the language that Capote uses to illustrate Dick’s exploitation does not leave room for excuses or sympathy. The tone indicates Dick has malicious intention in befriending Perry, which gives the readers a cynical impression of him. Furthermore, Dick is seen to be disregarding of the gravity of his crimes, especially as he replies to Perry’s comment, “I think there must be something wrong with us" (Capote 114) to commit the murder like they did, in which Dick replies, “Deal me out, baby, I'm a normal,” and continues to entertain the thought, “ But Perry—there
Dick did not have any second thoughts about the murder. He had firmly wanted to walk-in and kill the Clutter family despite their innocence. Dick viewed the Clutters’ as an opportunity that was going to make him rich. There was not any
From the beginning, Dick had a detailed plan of how they would carry out the murders, and he made sure that Perry was on board with his ideas. The scary part of all of this is that Dick considered himself normal, by saying, “I’m a normal” (Capote 108). In the book, it is clear that Dick was the one in control, and Perry is merely following his lead. For example, when they first discussed the robbery, Dick said, "If it's going to be done, it's got to be done right. No slip-ups...
The author Truman Capote’s tones in “In Cold Blood” are earnest and malicious. The thesis of the story is that the killers, Dick and Perry did not care about the Clutters. They did their job, and now they do not seem to be worried, Perry just a little bit AND Mr. Helm of course, but other than that Dick does not care about what they did. The imagery of the story is that it is confusing and harsh. Dick says, “Jesus, I’ve got the bastard kind.”
[He said] it [didn’t] bother Perry a bit” (Capote 255). Dick is honestly trying to make Perry look very guilty instead of him. Even though Perry killed all four of the Clutters, Capote was still against the death penalty for Perry. Capote was also biased throughout the story because of his “relationship” with Perry. An example of Capote’s bias is when he wrote that “Dewey, a believer in capital punishment, its purported deterrent effects, and its justice, witnessed the hangings” but he could not watch Perry’s hanging.