Racial Profiling By Law Enforcement Essay

It occurs everyday in minority communities, when law enforcement make judgement off stereotypes and characteristics. In the article “How the Supreme Court Authorized Racial Profiling” the author claims “The supreme courts first step to sanction racial profiling was Terry vs Ohio, an 8-1 ruling that developed the “reasonable suspicion standard (the stop and frisk rule)”(Guner Olsen). The quote provides evidence to my claim that there’s a law against racial profiling but it still happens in America. Law enforcement is supposed to protect our rights, not violate

Destroying the Civil Rights Rodney King and Oscar Grant cases both have racial injustice. Rodney king was in a high speed chase, he was caught; therefore, the officers pulled him out of the car and beat him. A couple of police Officers were detaining Oscar Grant then another officer shot him in the back. The beating and shooting of people, because of racial issues can and will defeat the purpose of civil rights.

Some say that stop and frisk policy is harmless unless someone is actually committing or has committed a crime. But there are plenty of incidents that has occurred due to this policy that proves that this isn’t true. One major incident is that stop question and frisk policy was that it was unconstitutional. According to Scheindlin, The New York Police Department has performed 4.4 million stops from 2004 to 2012 and 80 percent of the people frisked was reportedly blacks and Hispanics. This policy was used to racially profile against people of a particular race rather than prevent crime.

The issue of racial profiling has been called to national attention recently resulting in inefficient policing due to high tensions between law enforcement officials and minority races. The American justice system must take the initiative to end the improper treatment and wrongful deaths of people of

Harris article “The stories, the statistics, and the law: Why "driving while black" matters” correlates with Wilkins and Williams article in the essence that it’s addressing the reason police departments need to understand the underlying issues that stand in the way of learning and changing. In this study, Harris (2009) found that “racially biased pretextual traffic stops have a strong and immediate impact on the individual African-American drivers involved” (pg. 288). The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires specifies guidelines to be met to procure a warrant for a search (Harris, 2009). The amendment does not suggest whose rights would be vindicated by addressing these police practices. The great majority of black people experiencing this type of abuse and humiliation, only crime they committed was being black.

To summarize the article “Racial Profiling is Morally Wrong and Based on False Assumptions”, by James A. Kowalski, he argues that racial profiling is by no means effective, or good. It solves no problems, and causes people to fear law enforcement. Racial profiling is when an individual is suspected of a crime by law enforcement because of their race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. For example, “all blacks are gang members”. In addition to Kowalski’s arguments, he references the Zimmerman case from 2012 as an example of racial profiling gone wrong.

We all have freedom and to pick out by the color of our skin, make us forget that we have our freedom. To have freedom we should be able to do anything that we have the right, despite the color of someone’s skin. Everyone should be equal and be given their freedom. Racial profiling is taking freedom from people that wants to do something with

Annotated Bibliography: Racial Profiling This is an annotated bibliography researching the reasons for, effects of, and solutions to racial profiling by law enforcement in the United States. I am researching racial profiling and is it justified in law enforcement.

The number of shootings involving law enforcement officers and unarmed African American men has increased in the United States in recent months to the point where there is social unrest in one particular community: the African-American community. Groups such as Black Lives Matter have been created in the recent past to create tranquility between the police and the people of the Unites States. If media accounts of these incidents are accurate and these recent trends are taken together, the country is on the tipping point of a deadly unprecedented racial divide. It is safe to say that the majority of Americans would agree that the Civil Rights Movement achieved many of its goals, most would also agree that racism and racial profiling

Even though racial profiling might discriminate people, it could protect people from criminals. Some reports demonstrate that racial profiling practices discrimination towards specific people. For example, the police officers often stop black males in this country. According to an

According to some charts mainly African American, latino and other minority races are the most common to be stopped by officers because of stereotypes. The Constitution, through the fourth amendment, protects people from unreasonable search and seizure by the

Racial profiling occurs when law enforcement officials target individuals because of their race rather than because their behavior suggests they have broken or will break the law. Racial profiling can and does occur in a variety of different ways. Some forms of racial profiling most commonly discussed in the United States today include the practice of stopping African American drivers, singling out Latino/as for immigration checks and searching Arab Americans in airports. It can become a part of all types of decisions law enforcement officials must make, from deciding who to stop, who to arrest, on whom to use restraints and on whom to use lethal force.

Racial Profiling The controversial topic of racial profiling has generated a lot of debate in recent years. Law enforcement authorities' use of a person's race or ethnicity as grounds for suspicion and investigation has drawn ongoing criticism, examination, and debate. A contentious and divisive subject, racial profiling has generated many spirited debates and close examination. While some contend that it is a crucial tool for law enforcement to combat crime and ensure the public's safety, others see it as an example of discrimination that feeds into negative stereotypes and threatens civil rights.

Racial profiling is a very important issue that individuals in society face every day. This problem occurs in low income or poverty-stricken areas throughout cities and communities across the nation. Hundreds of anecdotal testimonials allege that law enforcement officials at all levels of government are infringing upon the constitutional rights and civil liberties of racial and ethnic minorities through a practice called “racial profiling” (Ward, 2002). So what is racial profiling? According to the National Institute of Justice, racial profiling by law enforcement is commonly defined as a practice that targets people for suspicion of crime based on their race, ethnicity, religion or national origin (National Institute of Justice, 2013).

Racial Profiling in America Racial profiling is defined as refers to the targeting of particular individuals by law enforcement authorities based not their behavior, but rather their personal characteristics ( The Leadership conference) . This is another mechanism for racial discrimination backed by the law. According to the The Leadership conference, racial discrimination is not solely on race, but based on religion, ethnicity and national origin.