Kaitlyn Kline
Professor DiFatta
Business Law
01 February 2015 The West Memphis three is a case that created quite a stir when it occurred back in the 1993 when the crime occurred and then again in 1994 when there was a conviction. There was a wrongful conviction made when three young men were convicted in this murder case. However, no one questioned it because they were seen as fitting the description of a criminal based upon outside appearances. There were three young boys that were found murdered in a ditch. There had been no physical evidence to link Jason Baldwin, Damien Echols, and Jessie Misskelley with the crime. However, they were convicted after Jessie Misskelley was questioned and had then went on to admit to supposedly committing
…show more content…
They seemed to already have in their minds whom was guilty. When something seemed to point in the direction for the men to be guilty, they seemed to be all for it.
How could Detective Bryn Ridge have heard Jessie Misskelley's confession and described it as "so close to perfect that it had to be believed" The confession at best was muddled, virtually free of information, or more specifically, information provided by Misskelley. In contrast, Detectives Ridge and Gitchell did describe injuries, weapons and the geographic location of the crime. (Hill)
In my opinion it seemed as though the police had a bias coming into the case, which is not right. Even though they were imprisoned the case was again opened up and there was an agreement that was reached with the West Memphis Three. Eventually there was an agreement that was reached that would finally give the men freedom that they had been waiting for. There was a plea agreement reached with the men. However, they had to enter a guilty plea in order for them to be
…show more content…
They filled out the paper work that would release them. The judge had them testify about their education and if they had been under the influence of drugs. The judge made them understand that they did not have to plead guilty. They asserted their innocence but said they were entering the plea on advice of counsel. (Leveritt)
Even though they were innocent they accepted taking a guilty verdict in order to try and clear their names from outside of the prison (Leveritt). Even though there was a deal made I am not sure that I totally agree that it really was a deal. They in the end still had to take the guilty ruling. They did this in order to get their friend off of death row was their main reasoning behind taking a guilty verdict. They are better off in trying to clear their names from outside of a jail cell rather than being inside and trying to clear their names (Leveritt). The West Memphis three case is one that gained a lot of attention. There were many obstacles that finally led up to the release of the three men. Many people supported them through their long journey in trying to prove their
Crime occurs almost every day, whether it is a major or a minor crime. People steal, commit corporate crimes and even kill. Canada is viewed as being a very safe and stable place to live because people are lucky enough to have healthcare, benefits for unemployment and family needs, as well as maternity leave. However, even in the most peaceful countries crimes occurs.
Dalainah Gustafson Due Date: Journal 4 I am reading To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, and I am on page 304. The book is about a girl, Mayella, who is accusing a man, Tom Robinson, of raping her. They go to court and she gets caught lying and some people think that Tom Robinson is telling the truth. In this journal I will be predicting and evaluating.
Jaymee Rich Nyah Brown English 11-5 9 May 2018 West Memphis Three: Guilty or Innocent? Introduction In the court of law, guilty and innocent alike are protected by certain rights.
Both men were successful in their appeals as a verdict of guilty could not be settled upon as the case was based on improbabilities and circumstantial evidence that could not lead to a definite
What happened: Well in this event there were two main parts, the first part being the Tasha’s father’s lawyer suggesting Tasha to go to court for her father 's bail hearing. So basically what happened Tasha went to go see Tasha’s father 's lawyer and he suggested to Tasha that she go to court but she was confused because it was going to be a school day. Then the lawyer explained that if Tasha went to court it would show the judge that Leonard’s family cared about him and believed in him enough to go to court and support him and possibly let him out on bail.
The movie “Loving” is based on a true story, and it depicts the lives of Richard and Mildred Loving, an interracial couple, living in Virginia. In 1958, the couple went to Washington D.C and got married. They married here for the reason that interracial marriage was banned in Virginia. Yet, when they got back home, they were arrested. They spent the expanse of nine years struggling for their right to live as family in their town.
Since the trials ended the colony began to suffer a lot of misfortunes like droughts, crop failures, smallpox outbreaks, and Native American attacks so they began to think that God was punishing them. But people had been too determined to catch witches and to destroy them that they neglected daily chores, farming, roads, business matters, and other things (Brooks, Rebecca,Salem Witch Trials: Historical sites and locations). For example the Blanchard sisters, people thought that the Blanchard sisters minds' were also disordered and others thought that they were possessed by Satan. When the Blanchard sisters became adults the three girls went to their pastor and told him that they faked the possessed act just to get attention(Aftermath of the
Title: In Cold Blood Author: Truman Capote Genre (include original copyright date): True crime (1965) Setting (remember setting is not just time and place): 1959 Holcomb, Kansas- small, rural town where the people feel safe; the conservative, church-going members of the community all know each other and trust one another “Good neighbors, people who care about each other” (33) “Theretofore sufficiently unfearful of each other to seldom trouble to lock their doors” (5) The Corner- Kansas State Penitentiary; Dick and Perry are on death row; no escaping Characters and Brief Description: Perry Smith- Responsible for the murder of the Clutter family; injured in a motorcycle accident and his “chunky, dwarfish legs….
1. Who really killed Chung Ga? Ah San killed Chung Ga had done all the killing by stabbing Chung Ga. 2. Cite direct evidence explaining why Ah Cho believes that five people cannot be charged with the crime and that he will be found innocent.
People plead guilty for crimes that are not committed by them to avoid trial, but by doing so the right decision wasn’t made.
The movie The story of Qiu Ju is a comedy-drama that follows the story of a pregnant woman trying to find justice for her husband, who was kicked by the head of the village. The settings of the movie are mostly in a small Chinese village during the 1990s. It is hard for some people to understand the themes of the movie and why it was created on the first place, since not everyone have seen the way of life shown and the Chinese history. The movie was produced mainly because many people could relate to it during that time and that is one of the main reasons many movies in the past were created. People like finding connection with themselves in a movie and for the most part there are two ways that this can be done.
No medical evidence was ever collected or shown to prove that the crime ever took place. On the night after the assault, Mayella Ewell was never seen be a doctor. She was never examined to prove that Tom Robinson did anything to her. Mayella stated that she was beaten that night, so she should have gone to the doctor to get checked out. There is no proof of any crime, so there should not have been a guilty verdict.
1930-1950 Over the years the face of police brutality has changed. The face of police brutality in the early 1900’s is different than what you would think of as police brutality in today’s society. Part of this change is due to the credibility of a black person’s testimony in the eyes of the law. In the 1930’s black people technically the same rights as their white counterparts but were not treated in the same way.
In this movie, a dramatic situation took place in which Denise Moore was a victim of a robbery and got assaulted by slashing her face during she went to meet with someone. To find out the criminal, Police showed her several photos and she picked up Jessie Williams mug shot. Later she also confirmed him by showing him in a lineup. But from the first, till last Jessie William said that he did not do that and he was not there. This movie shows a wonderful case in which both of the criminal and suspects seems right from their perspective.
“I ‘ave nothing to do with their sentencing.” “You do. I leave their sentence up to you. They can be executed, if that’s what you want.