Argument nowadays has become fruitless-getting nowhere because people listen to argue and not to understand. However, in the speech “Hard Truths: Law Enforcements and Race” given by the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I), James B. Comey addresses that it is imperative to not only listen but understand the differences in perspectives when discussing racial profiling. Furthermore, he implores his audience to consider that the topic about law enforcement dealing with race is much more complicated than it seems. Comey’s implicit thesis does support that there is evidence of racial bias in law enforcement; moreover, his purpose is to establish sympathy for the two opposing sides: law enforcements and the people of color. Overall, …show more content…
He asserts that “Something happens to people in law enforcement...after years of police work, officers often can’t help but be influenced by the cynicism they feel.” He rationalizes but does not deny, the law enforcement’s aggressive actions that the people of color may have seen or experienced. This method of pathos not only diversifies but also fortifies his thesis that there is evidence of racial profiling; however, he once again give reason for their skepticism to execute his primary purpose. Overall, dedicating three of his four “hard truths” to justify the actions of the law enforcement is crucial to his argument as a whole because his audience may have portrayed them differently …show more content…
Comey cites Barack Obama as a superior and well-known figure to provide him with more credibility. He affirms that “The President is addressing the disproportionate challenges faced by young men or color. For instance, data shows that the percentage of youth not working or not enrolled in school is nearly twice as high for black as it is for white,” to include a logical foundation to his argument. Furthermore, defending that people of color are susceptible to racial bias as a final support is a strategic way to enforce his purpose because he supports it with statistical data and a valid authority. To add, he later announces that this is such a daunting topic because of the lack of evidence from the F.B.I’s data base. Comey says “The first step to understanding what is really going on in our communities and in our country is to gather more and better data…” to promote the feeling of oneness. This claim is essential to his main point because he informs that law enforcement and people of color must work together to tackle this controversial issue. Ultimately, this final reasons blurs out the unseen barrier that separated the two
Today’s topic: Police Brutality “Yall haters corny with that illuminati mess, paparazzi catch my fly and my cocky dress. I’m so reckless when I rock my Givenchy dress. I’m so possessive so I rock his Roc necklaces. My daddy alabama, momma louisiana.
“...Much of the recent crime increase threatens the vitality of America’s cities–and thousands of lives–it is not, in itself, the greatest danger in today’s war on cops. The greatest danger lies, rather, in the delegitimation of law and order itself’ (Mac Donald). In the book “The War on Cops: How the New Attack on Law and Order Makes Everyone Less Safe,” published in the year of 2016, author Heather Mac Donald provides credible evidence to expand on her viewpoint of our country’s current criminal crisis. In addition to “The War on Cops, Mac Donald has written two other books. Her works “Are Cops Racist?”
Through the personal stories that Miller shared, it’s obvious that racial profiling plays a large role in arrest rates and cycles of incarceration. While the world has made a significant stride in racial injustices in comparison to the country’s past, racism still exists. When, and how, is this going to end? This is an important factor to consider in both aspects of the incarceration system and reentry process, as racial profiling occurs in both. Also, the true cause of guilt is important to consider as many people are falsely accused.
Staples carefully develops an argument that forces readers to face their own racial biases and presumptions through the careful use of purpose, unity, coherence, organization, and revision. Staples' article serves two purposes: to educate readers on the realities of racial profiling and discrimination and to persuade them to consider their own prejudices. By fusing intimate tales with greater historical and sociological background, he succeeds in doing this. He describes, for instance, how a white woman sprinted away from him
The relationship between racial profiling and racism painted by Risse and Zeckhauser is implausible. The individual is required to picture a society where racism plays no role in law enforcement’s use of racial profiling over other plausible ways of responding to racial disparities in crime. It also asks the individual to believe that racial profiling of minorities can be executed fairly in a society that is viewed as racist. Only on these assumptions can an individual make the objection to racial profiling as an objection to racism rather than profiling.
In his essay “Arrested Development: The Conservative Case Against Racial Profiling” published in the New Republic on September 10, 2001, professor James Forman Jr. illustrates his disagreement with racial profiling. Forman Jr. is a professor at Yale Law School. He teaches Constitutional Law and seminars on race and the criminal justice system. In his piece, Forman primary goal is to create understanding about the effectiveness of racial profiling and how this affects the black community especially youths. Forman achieves this by appealing to a liberal audience.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Alexander, M. (2012). The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: The New Press. Michelle Alexander in her book, "The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness" argues that law enforcement officials routinely racially profile minorities to deny them socially, politically, and economically as was accustomed in the Jim Crow era.
"Racial Profiling and Criminal Justice." The Journal of Ethics, vol. 15, no. 1-2, 2011. , pp. 79-88. Nclive, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9098-3.
In conclusion, the idea of racial profiling and the issues on racism in today’s society calls attention to sustain peace and ethnic equality within communities all across the nation and around the world. It is important to acknowledge that the main solution to change the issues on racial profiling and racism is among the duties of government authorities, law enforcement officials, and the people of a nation. Everyone, of any race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or authority needs to understand that our voices and actions are capable of fixing the issues of racial injustice into a more fair environment to all people of color. Therefore, it is up to our knowledge and actions to help people understand that the solution to obtain racial equality
In this process, it shows how social science research and policy analysis may be more fully than the police investigation so far practice their fair meaning. " Simply put, the debate about race analysis about whether officials could legitimately consider a person's race or ethnicity as a debate, they decide whether to stop or search for the person. Those who defended racial profiling began to think, Sadly, many types of crime are more concentrated in certain racial and ethnic groups are more effective than others in 1995 Tonry), and this fact means that racial profiling can often help the police against them monitor (2001 Derby). But even if the relevant distribution experience in criminal claims are true, it is impossible to solve the ethical
Throughout history, disputes and tensions between law enforcement officials and communities of minorities have endured hostility and violence between each other. Racial profiling has become a “hot topic” for researchers as well as for politicians and by now it is likely that most citizens are at least aware of the common accusations of racial bias pitted against law enforcement (Cochran & Warren, 2013). Communities of color are being discriminated against and racially profiled by white police officers for any suspicion of criminal activities. It has been widely assumed by policy makers and citizens alike that allegations of racial profiling are mostly associated with the policing practices of white officers and their treatment of racial and ethnic minorities (Cochran & Warren, 2013). Also, individuals of minority descent will certainly recognize that they are being racially profiled during a stop that is being conducted by a white police officer.
Danielle Johnson APMA 3 Topic: Racial Profiling Thesis Statement: Because of recent events in America including September 11th attacks, the influx of immigration, and recent racial tension with African Americans and police officers, there has been an increase in racial profiling. Racial profiling is a degrading practice that is a violation against human rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution, thus why the United states government should create effective guidelines restricting law enforcement officers from practicing racial profiling.
The politics of race and ethnicity has pervaded the war against terror and drugs trafficking due to what Walker (2010) describes as the bait and switch approach. The serious issues of terrorism and drugs have been overshadowed from its original purpose by racism and ethnicity issues in our country. With no regard with the effect it had with public relations. Berman and Fox (2010) quote a former police chief admitting that in police agencies, they are no clear standards for defining and measuring policy success or failure. With such a revelation, it is hard to believe that federal and state law enforcement agencies are taking their time to review the program in an attempt to seal the
According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, departments that serve less than 2,500 people are 84.4% white and departments that serve millions are 53.4% white (as cited in Fifield, 2016). Notably, Over the years, a lack of diversity within law enforcement has become a pertinent issue. Notably, the underrepresentation of minorities within law enforcement influences the relationship between communities and law enforcement by engendering distrust with law enforcement. To say nothing of, underrepresentation of minorities have had many people question whether departments mirror a diverse community. Nevertheless, with that being said, underrepresentation of minorities have generated tension and distrust between communities and law enforcement and many believe that police department need to mirror the race composition within their cities.
Police Brutality is an ongoing problem and existent concern in the United States and should be resolved immediately. Law enforcement must function as an element that consists of organized and civilized officers. The presence of police brutality is becoming more of an issue as society grows. The problem posed by the illegal exercise of police power is an ongoing reality for individuals of a disfavored race, class, or sexual orientation. Police brutality must be stopped so that police do not forget who they are serving – not themselves, but the public.