David B. Muhlhausen wrote an article “How the death penalty saves lives,” With a heading of “Capital punishment curbs criminal behavior and promotes a safer country.” Muhlhausen talks about a man named Earl Ringo Jr, his purpose was to bring the question ‘How does the death penalty saves lives,’ into people's minds. The date of this article is Sept. 29, 2014, Muhlhausen works for US New and World Report. Muhlhausen informs ages 10 and up in this article because death penalty might be a little too harsh for little kids who still do not even know what death is yet. Therefor, Muhlhausen also states examples of how the death penalty can save lives. Lastly, Muhlhausen adopted a serious and a factual tone in order to get the death penalty …show more content…
Following, he used logos when he discussed how many can be saved with the death penalty, the decrease of murders and how americans view the death penalty. For example, Muhlhausen states, “[...] 61 percent Americans view the death penalty as morally acceptable, and only 30 percent disagreed.” ( Muhlhausen, pg1.) Next, there are different writing styles used in the article, for example, diction is used a lot throughout the article. Muhlhausen uses adjectives to really get his point across and show the importance of all of it. He states, “[..] in their opposition to the death penalty, American have consistently supported capital punishment[...],” Also states, “[...] view the death penalty as morally acceptable.” ( Muhlhausen, pg1.) Muhlhausen uses logos to show the facts on how the death penalty can save lives. It shows and convinces the readers that can believe what he is saying and might make more of an impact because it is stating facts. Readers like facts they know they can trust facts. Diction is used because his words will make the article more meaningful. It emphasizes his sentences and will help the author sound like he knows what he is talking about. Eventho this article is old it still relates to today's world, there are so many murders in the world this will get people's minds thinking on what to do with them.The purpose of using all these was to appeal to almost all ages and to help everyone
While in prison he came up with what he considered to be the way to commit the perfect murder due to him misunderstanding the concept of Corpus delicti
The author used many examples of logos to prove that his arguments were legit and make sure the readers know that too. One of the stronger examples of logos that I found was when Chuck was explaining that sometimes you don't remember learning things, or ever doing them and sometimes you have not, but you just know how to do them and our bodies will just do things we never thought we could do. " One day, you just suddenly realize it's something you know. And --somehow-- there's a cold logic to it.
Capital punishment has long been a heavily debated issue. In his article, “The Rescue Defence of Capital Punishment,” author Steve Aspenson make a moral argument in favor of capital punishment on the grounds that that is the only way to bring about justice and “rescue” murder victims. Aspenson argues as follows: 1. We have a general, prima facie duty to rescue victims from increasing harm. 2.
The murder trial had stirred up his thinking on the war. Though he regretted his actions in the incident, he believed that they were the natural extension of the things they were taught and encouraged to do in the war. He was frustrated by military court’s refusal to consider factors of the war. It further inflamed his belief that the war had produced a spirit of brutality, which corrupted the moral condition of those who had engaged in it, and that the military command did not operate with intellectual consistency. A plane could bomb a village of civilians and somehow have it be treated as a legitimate war action, while foot soldiers encouraged to hunt down the enemy at all cost and getting civilians caught in the process was taboo.
In conclusion, the author uses the emotions that the man feels as justification for his actions, leading readers to understand why he would kill the
In this article author James Rachels highlights the true meaning along with pros and cons of what active and passive euthanasia are. Since the very beginning the author ensures that the reader can understand the difference between these two concepts. He uses multiple examples and facts to support his idea. For example, he mentions that active euthanasia is at times more humane than that of passive euthanasia. His thought regarding this is that, with active euthanasia the person is less prone to having a painful death rather than just letting a person go through the passive channel and just letting that person suffer and die with agony.
Overall, all the articles were written in third person and therefore, didn’t have any personal insight on the issue and two of the three articles were written with a formal
At the end of Chapter 4, he talks about how he’s applied this experience to how he approaches arguments about the death penalty now, and how odd and inhumane it is to kill people who kill people as punishment for killing people. Specifically, “In debates about the death penalty, I had started arguing
After reading and analyzing the information given in the text “The Nuremberg Laws” it is clear the text is very objective. When a reader analyzes a text that is informal or has opinions and thoughts of others on a topic, it will impact the reader when assembling an opinion of their own about the topic. This is why it is important for readers to explore a balance of objectively and subjectively written texts when learning about a topic. This will not only give the reader a broader intelligence on the topic, but also different perspectives on the
A Gallup poll in 1942 found that only 1% of Americans favoured the trial for Adolf Hitler, and a full 39% supporting the execution (with a 3% supporting a slow torture). Again in 1944 a poll was constituted wherein 88% Americans were in support of punishing the Japanese military leadership and only 4% believe in a fair trial. Even though these anecdotes have paved way for fair and just trials, still some pertinent questions are raised as to why should such offenders
He talks about how Hitler killed thousands and at the time considered under the law "legitimate". Hitler tormented individuals, tore separated families, pulverized towns for the
About 7482 death sentences have been handed out over 31 years. Of those 117 were innocent people (7). Even though that doesn’t like much, over one hundred innocent people died because they were falsely accused. The topic of deciding one's punishment for killing another has been discussed many times. In many cases innocent people are killed, because they were wrongly convicted.
Death Penalty is the punishment of execution administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. For many years since the early 1800’s the death penalty has been around in America. We use the death penalty in the most brutal ways someone has killed someone. Why do we have the death penalty? It's a tradition.
There is a dramatic relationship between the number of executions carried out and a comparable reduction in the number of murders. It shows that the death penalty can scare off the criminals from killing someone and making them rethink of whether they should go on with the crime or
Jonathan Rothschild Capital Punishment essay Inhumanity of Capital Punishment Capital punishment is not a humane way of making a suspect suffer as worse as the victim who got killed suffered that day. It might seem that the cost of keeping someone in jail might be more than the death penalty but according to deathpenalty.org, the cost of keeping someone in jail is only a fraction of the cost of the death penalty. In California, the state spends 184 million dollars a year on the death penalty and is on track to spend 1 billion dollars over the next 5 years. Also, the death penalty doesn’t prove that people are innocent before being proved guilty because innocent people have died years before evidence was found that they were really innocent. There have been many debates